Hi,
I just got my 2365 exam results and certificates in the post. I passed, with distinctions for 202, 203 and 501, and 80-90% for everything else except the practical assessment, for which I got a Pass.
Perhaps I didn't deserve anything more than a straight pass, but some things are bothering me.
We were given the schematics a few days before the practical assessment, so I took them home to study, and plan a course of action. The plan was simple: 2.5 days in the workshop, so day 1 for the first fix, day 2 for the second fix, leaving half a day for fault finding and general tidying up.
The plan worked out well. I didn't quite finish the first fix on the first day, but I soon made up time on the second day, and completed the installation that day. I spent the final half day checking everything, correcting the odd mistake, and trimming the tails so all the fittings were neat.
The assessor came and tested and checked it. When he finished he said "Well done - you passed", and he said "I marked you down because you took so long". Then he said "I must admit, I didn't think you'd finish in time".
I suppose I should be pleased. But I remain baffled as to why he thinks I should have been quicker, when I knew how long I had to do the job in. No one ever mentioned the possibility of getting marked down for taking the allotted time to do the job.
I don't know why he thought I wouldn't finish in time either. He knows nothing about me, and doesn't know I spent a whole career planning and meeting deadlines in a completely different industry. But deadlines are deadlines and planning is planning, in whatever industry.
The installation was ripped off the wall as soon as the assessment was over, but I took photographs, that show what a neat and tidy job I made of it.
Should I appeal? I think I deserved a Merit at least.
p.s. I just had a thought - I'm not even certain that Distinctions and Merits are awarded for the (204) practical. My apologises if that is so.
I just got my 2365 exam results and certificates in the post. I passed, with distinctions for 202, 203 and 501, and 80-90% for everything else except the practical assessment, for which I got a Pass.
Perhaps I didn't deserve anything more than a straight pass, but some things are bothering me.
We were given the schematics a few days before the practical assessment, so I took them home to study, and plan a course of action. The plan was simple: 2.5 days in the workshop, so day 1 for the first fix, day 2 for the second fix, leaving half a day for fault finding and general tidying up.
The plan worked out well. I didn't quite finish the first fix on the first day, but I soon made up time on the second day, and completed the installation that day. I spent the final half day checking everything, correcting the odd mistake, and trimming the tails so all the fittings were neat.
The assessor came and tested and checked it. When he finished he said "Well done - you passed", and he said "I marked you down because you took so long". Then he said "I must admit, I didn't think you'd finish in time".
I suppose I should be pleased. But I remain baffled as to why he thinks I should have been quicker, when I knew how long I had to do the job in. No one ever mentioned the possibility of getting marked down for taking the allotted time to do the job.
I don't know why he thought I wouldn't finish in time either. He knows nothing about me, and doesn't know I spent a whole career planning and meeting deadlines in a completely different industry. But deadlines are deadlines and planning is planning, in whatever industry.
The installation was ripped off the wall as soon as the assessment was over, but I took photographs, that show what a neat and tidy job I made of it.
Should I appeal? I think I deserved a Merit at least.
p.s. I just had a thought - I'm not even certain that Distinctions and Merits are awarded for the (204) practical. My apologises if that is so.