Food for Thought | Page 5 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Food for Thought in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

S

Spazz

Yes another EICR question about landlords

Everyone knows about my fight to get RCDs and EICRs monitory.

But here is a question to see if it is already a legal requirement for EICRs!

I know there is no law stating that EICRs must be carried out but there is a law stating the electrical installation must be maintained and in safe working order.

So my question is how do you maintain and ensure that an electrical installation complies with this legal requirement without inspecting it since it was put into operation in the first place?
How do you know that it is still safe and maintained to the standard which is expected?
 
I will contact some of my contacts who have helped with the current and see what they suggest because the government have just reviewed Part P in England, Im sure Wales will follow suit - I will comment on the Welsh one when it comes out for pre-view.

It might be worth waiting till 2015 till the next review comes out for England.
 
If you scrap Part P then you scrap the notifiable works scheme then everything will get out of control!
Have you read the new Proposed Part P document - sounds alot better! It is proposing removing the LABC signing off notifiable jobs by not registered persons and getting approved inspector electricians already with a Part P provide to test and inspect them instead!

This then puts the control into the hands of those who have done the Inspect Test and who are registered approved inspectors.


Take a read of the proposed guidelines and you will see
 
Also you say make it like Gas - it is like gas now!
I could do a gas install and sign it off with LABC - the only difference with gas is it contains a mandatory PAT test on the appliances (for rental).

The only difference is that people dont try their luck with doing gas themselves (usually) compared to electric.
 
I know this might not be a perfect analogy but - I remember the old open non shuttered sockets, as do a lot of other people that survived ''''the horrors of a earlier system''' and i'm dam sure most of us came through it unhurt. Electricity isn't a dangerous killer behind that wall socket waiting to kill and all these deaths due to electric shock are they because the person was sodding about and doing something he/she knew nothing about (no way on this earth you'll stop that).
It's Joe Public that need to show respect for electric.
The UK is becoming a strange place though I must admit, all around me here we're now getting 20mph zones and not just around schools so we use more petrol and cars give out more emisions as it's 3rd or 4th gear driving - more petrol used for the same distance.
Why can't people learn to cross the flippin road like we did ??????
So if something that flippin stupid (that causes more damage to the environment) can be put into place to save idiots that can't cross a road then you might very well get your way.
The world's gradually going mad, i'm really glad I grew up in the good old days.
 
My point is, these are not notifiable as you say but why are you not crusading to make it notifiable or as I suggested earlier, to make Part P a meaningful, workable, enforceable piece of legislation.
Something that we all would happily get behind

I'd be happy - delighted in fact - to get behind Part P & shove it off Marsden Cliffs
 
but there's that much hot air in part p , it would probably float off into outer space. now the bureaucrats fat cats making money off all our backs. them i would like to dump over a cliff.
 
That is a crap example - have you ever fitted a pair of brake pads - you cant get them wrong! If you do then the brake caliper wont go back on - break shoes on the other hand are a pain in the a***

Oh yes you can I have seen the wrong pads supplied and some one attempt to fit them as they would fit in the calliper and must be right cos the guy at the motor factors said they were so it's not a crap example

I think there are a load on here who is either looking for a reason to have a bitch or generally dont get the idea of why I am doing this!

As has been said all landlords have the lives of their tenants in their hands (which everyone agrees with)
Yes Electricity in general is very safe but only in the hands of those who respect it! there are properties out there with no RCD protection, none compliant sockets (no safety covers in them), and no bonding throughout - some without even a cpc in the circuits. - glad to say these are fair and far in between!

Now think about it if you have a child (say <2 years old) and puts their fingers into a none compliant socket the only thing that will save their life is a RCD which operates correctly and disconnects within 40ms (at that current).

Yes we all know RCDs have their floors and yes we all know they slow down but done we all with age!

At the end of the day if a child is killed the landlord will be up on a manslaughter charge - now how many years do you think that landlord will face? 6 years or 10 years or more? Plus how do you think that landlord will feel?

Me personally I would not worry about the jail sentence - the guilt of someone being killed because I could not be bothered to fit a RCD or change the sockets is what will kill me! - I would be another statistic of those who hung them self in jail!

So now re-look at this again and see why I am doing this - protection for that child and protection for that landlord!

So objection and reasoned argument is now bitching

Tenants also have their own lives in their own hands and cannot and should not abdicate responsibility to a landlord due to their stupidity

If a child of that age is unsupervised then the parents or adult left to care for the child must take some responsibility

I assume by a non compliant socket you a referring to one not manufactured to BS1363 and therefore circa pre 1947

RCD's do have their flaws like the test button not being used quarterly to check it's operation a homeowner / tenant test that is never or rarely carried out

At the end of the day a landlord on a manslaughter charge for the death of a child he / she had no direct supervision of would be an injustice IMO and questions would have to be asked of the parents or carer allowing a child to be exposed to danger

I stiil have the same view of this and it appears you are attempting to protect people from their own stupidity

Yes I know that deaths as a result of electric is low - THANK GOD! but they are still happening and that is to many as far as I am concerned.

Just found some statistics released in Feb 2012 - 20% of electric shocks happen in rented properties.
Thats 4 deaths per year (15 elsewhere)
Thats 558 injuries per year (2,230 elsewhere)
Thats 4,285 electrical fires (17,139 elsewhere)
Thats 10 people killed as a result of electrical fires (39 elsewhere)

These stats are from ESC

Yet another set of meaningless stats that actually tell us precisely NOTHING

I fully agree, its just the example he used was not the best.

I know working on cars can be really dangerous and can cause more accidents but in general working on cars is fairly safe - if something goes wrong it usually goes so wrong that you notice it (or the onboard computer does) before the car moves anywhere - deaths from poor car repairs is realtivally low - but I get what you mean!

You are dismissing this IMO with little knowledge or background in the vehicle trade and yet again expect the vehicle computer to protect the user from their own stupidity. I'm surprised you haven't supported this by more of those flawed stats you keep quoting

Friday when I installed a ciling rose in a rental property - managed to persuade them to change them as well

So you found an unshuttered socket that obviously was not a BS1363 socket or if it was, was it faulty if this is the case how long had it been faulty and had the landlord been informed again tenant damage not reported to landlord you are suggesting the landlord takes the rap

I keep saying - these are as important as the 20% rental properties but things can only be done about those who have responsibility over someone else's life
These include:
Rental Properties
Commercial
Industrial
Hospitals
Social Clubs
etc

these dont include privately owned domestic houses where the owner lives at the address

We all have responsibility for ourselves and any minors in our care abdicating responsibility and pointing the finger at others is not an option

If I go into a shop on Northumberland Street chances are it's rented, if it's in the Metrocentre then it definitely is. The owner of the premises has a legal duty of care to ensure as far as is reasonably practical that I will come to no harm. I've seen some pretty bad install in shops mate. Are you going to include these in your campaign? If not, why not?

Mainly badly installed FP on the fire alarms from what I've seen of these places

I would love to include these - but as said above commercial is not notifiable and it does not look like it will be

My personal opinion is that they should be notifiable!


Either way these shops have a duty of care exactly as you say!
If they are as bad as you say then a quiet word to the local EHP is in order!

The problem is at the moment a lot of people are coming from Europe and the rest of the world and they are used to doing their own electrics so they come here in search of a better life and they carry on with what they know!

If these became notifiable then all these problems will disappear as electricians will be carrying out the instead of Joe Blogs from the pub or Mr Muhammad from the corner shop doing his own electrics - I AM NOT RACIST!

I don't thing these issues would disappear by making it notifiable look at Part P


I have said before this is a fatally flawed crusade that has little or no substance other than protecting tenants from their own stupidity
 
If you scrap Part P then you scrap the notifiable works scheme then everything will get out of control!
Have you read the new Proposed Part P document - sounds alot better! It is proposing removing the LABC signing off notifiable jobs by not registered persons and getting approved inspector electricians already with a Part P provide to test and inspect them instead!

This then puts the control into the hands of those who have done the Inspect Test and who are registered approved inspectors.


Take a read of the proposed guidelines and you will see

It's out of control anyway

The proposals are mickey mouse what will be the criteria for approved inspector electricians quick fix course and scam registration

Not sure what I or anybody else will see in the proposed guidelines apart from unneeded red tape as it has always been with Part P
 
Yes another EICR question about landlords

Everyone knows about my fight to get RCDs and EICRs monitory.

But here is a question to see if it is already a legal requirement for EICRs!

I know there is no law stating that EICRs must be carried out but there is a law stating the electrical installation must be maintained and in safe working order.

So my question is how do you maintain and ensure that an electrical installation complies with this legal requirement without inspecting it since it was put into operation in the first place?
How do you know that it is still safe and maintained to the standard which is expected?

its down to the landlord simple!!! the landlord should have the eicr carried out no-one can force them to abide to it, but if something were to happen to a tennant the landlord will be prosecuted.
In a few years time i would imagine its going to be compulsary for all landlords.
 

Reply to Food for Thought in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
279
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
775
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
783

Similar threads

  • Question
Generally speaking local earthing will rarely be below a couple of ohms, so in parallel with a TN-S sub-ohm value will make little difference...
Replies
4
Views
693
  • Question
No it is not implying it is safe, it is stating what the recommended date for the next inspection is. The next inspection date sticker doesn't...
Replies
10
Views
2K
davesparks
D

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top