Garage earth | Page 3 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Garage earth in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Holding little regard, not me. Since PME became common practice back in the seventies mainly as a cost cutting exercise the problems of a lost neutral was deemed an acceptable risk. If correct bonding/earthing is in place within a premises the loss of a neutral should cause no hazard, there is a risk however if someone were in contact with any part of the internal earth and true earth outside. The loss of a neutral is slim but possible, it as also possible Kelly Brook will knock at my door tonight to massage my feet. The garage the op talks of has no requirement for bonding and the only risk should the loss of neutral occur is if he is touching the internal earth with true earth, an acceptable risk.

No super like button yet..
 
Holding little regard, not me. Since PME became common practice back in the seventies mainly as a cost cutting exercise the problems of a lost neutral was deemed an acceptable risk. If correct bonding/earthing is in place within a premises the loss of a neutral should cause no hazard, there is a risk however if someone were in contact with any part of the internal earth and true earth outside. The loss of a neutral is slim but possible, it as also possible Kelly Brook will knock at my door tonight to massage my feet. The garage the op talks of has no requirement for bonding and the only risk should the loss of neutral occur is if he is touching the internal earth with true earth, an acceptable risk.

Good point. Thanks for that.
 
Well gents, I knew this thread would be mildly controversial and I appreciate all the input it's had over the past days. Thank you all for taking the time to give your experienced opinions.
I suppose there are for's, against's, if's, but's and possibilities on both sides of the argument, as there are in many situations.
It's never as black and white as we'd like. At the end of the day, I think it comes down to which method carries the least risk.
P.s. I haven't forgotten the CSA asked for earlier, I'll let you know when I've looked
 
[

Holding little regard, not me. Since PME became common practice back in the seventies mainly as a cost cutting exercise the problems of a lost neutral was deemed an acceptable risk. If correct bonding/earthing is in place within a premises the loss of a neutral should cause no hazard, there is a risk however if someone were in contact with any part of the internal earth and true earth outside. The loss of a neutral is slim but possible, it as also possible Kelly Brook will knock at my door tonight to massage my feet. The garage the op talks of has no requirement for bonding and the only risk should the loss of neutral occur is if he is touching the internal earth with true earth, an acceptable risk.

So a cross body electric shock is an acceptable risk to take in your installations isit? Im sure you dont tell your customers that. I know a lost dno is rare as chickens teeth but in CAN happen, i belive it should not be overlooked so lightly
 
[



So a cross body electric shock is an acceptable risk to take in your installations isit? Im sure you dont tell your customers that. I know a lost dno is rare as chickens teeth but in CAN happen, i belive it should not be overlooked so lightly

No, not at all. I am merely trying to weigh up the situation and come to a logical decision, based on the opinions of educated and experienced engineers.

I am sure that it is just as possible to get a shock using the other method. An earth rod can become disconnected I'm sure. That is the reason I am thinking through things instead of rushing in blind.
Which would be more likely, in your opinion ?
Loosing the mains neutral or the earth cable becoming disconnected from the rod ? There is still an RCBO on this too don't forget !
 
Last edited:
An rcbo wont disconect the supply through loss of neutral. ? Yes an earth rod connection could get disconnected but this would not bring the installation earth live!
 
No, not at all. I am merely trying to weigh up the situation and come to a logical decision, based on the opinions of educated and experienced engineers.

I am sure that it is just as possible to get a shock using the other method. An earth rod can become disconnected I'm sure. That is the reason I am thinking through things instead of rushing in blind.
Which would be more likely, in your opinion ?
Loosing the mains neutral or the earth cable becoming disconnected from the rod ? There is still an RCBO on this too don't forget !
Are you likely to be exposed to true earth and the PME earth in the garage at the same time.
 
Hence my question reg building structure, if theres no exposed structural steel or extraneous parts id aloso have no problem with exporting the pme. If there is then the supply cable csa will need to be confirmed to see if its suitable to be used as a cpc and bonding conductor from MET or EMT. Also woudnt have a problem TT ing the outbuilding.
 
Hence my question reg building structure, if theres no exposed structural steel or extraneous parts id aloso have no problem with exporting the pme. If there is then the supply cable csa will need to be confirmed to see if its suitable to be used as a cpc and bonding conductor from MET or EMT. Also woudnt have a problem TT ing the outbuilding.
No I agree but he says bonding isn't a requirement and the only metal parts is the garage door which probably isn't extraneous.
 
An rcbo wont disconect the supply through loss of neutral. ? Yes an earth rod connection could get disconnected but this would not bring the installation earth live!

I did think that ( about the RCBO not working in that situation).
The garage is concrete sectional type.
Not had chance to look at cable yet, maybe tomorrow.
 
Hence my question reg building structure, if theres no exposed structural steel or extraneous parts id aloso have no problem with exporting the pme. If there is then the supply cable csa will need to be confirmed to see if its suitable to be used as a cpc and bonding conductor from MET or EMT. Also woudnt have a problem TT ing the outbuilding.

The csa of the armouring is 22.27 mm square
The cable is three core 6mm

Whilst we're on this subject. If the neutral was lost, surely we would have the same dangers inside the house the supply comes from ?
 

Reply to Garage earth in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
291
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
798
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
828

Similar threads

Sounds more positive.
Replies
8
Views
613
And if it's a garage then use metal clad accessories.
Replies
5
Views
411

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top