Have the rules for ring mains changed over the years? | Page 10 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Have the rules for ring mains changed over the years? in the Electrical Engineering Chat area at ElectriciansForums.net

Nobody has said that the rest of the world is wrong!

You're the only person who displayed such a narrow mindset.
I don't think stating that the rest of the world gets by just fine without rings and therefore proves they're unnecessary, is really a mindset at all, just a fact.

I put one in today that's got 4 sockets going on. Again running only a TV and the occasional hoover. Every spark from another country would laugh at that design choice.
 
I don't think stating that the rest of the world gets by just fine without rings and therefore proves they're unnecessary, is really a mindset at all, just a fact.
The rest of the world does not use fused plugs. Once you understand what that implies you will see why a 32A feed can be used in the UK and not for general sockets elsewhere. And from that point you can grasp why the RFC is an elegant solution for typical use over, say, a 32A radial.

Remember the UK used to have unfused plugs to BS546, commonly in 5A and 15A, on radial circuits only. Post WW2 we moved to 13A fused plugs and the RFC to make it more efficient. Those plugs are not seen much now (sometimes 5A for switched light sockets) in the UK, but are still the standard in India and a few former colonies of the UK.

I put one in today that's got 4 sockets going on. Again running only a TV and the occasional hoover. Every spark from another country would laugh at that design choice.
For a few sockets in one place it is not a sensible choice.

For a whole floor's worth of sockets it is.

Did you read the comparison thread I suggested earlier? All of these things are covered in some technical detail.

As far as EU versus UK versus USA they all have good and bad points on both design aspects and on an installation aspects. But there is always a reason for those choices. To simple dismiss something you are not familiar with while not studying the reasons behind there development is not a good way to learn.
 
I put one in today that's got 4 sockets going on. Again running only a TV and the occasional hoover. Every spark from another country would laugh at that design choice.

A lot of electricians in this country would also laugh at that design choice. Why did you choose a ring circuit over a radial for that?

You installing a ring unnecessarily does not mean that there is anything wrong with ring circuits, it just proves that you have installed one unnecessarily.
 
Why did you choose a ring circuit over a radial for that?
I didn't. The designer did.
You installing a ring unnecessarily does not mean that there is anything wrong with ring circuits, it just proves that you have installed one unnecessarily.
It proves i've installed one to the designer's spec. I'm not allowed to just ignore drawings and do what i like.

And that's the problem - even those with qualifications to design installations are still stuck on this idea that all power has to be on rings. I've never been on a site in the UK where a radial has been used for power outlets, it's always rings.
 
The rest of the world does not use fused plugs. Once you understand what that implies you will see why a 32A feed can be used in the UK and not for general sockets elsewhere.
That's fine but i wasn't arguing that RoW uses radials because they can't use rings; more that the fact they don't use them proves they're not needed to install perfectly safe and operational installations. Rings are simply unnecessary.

I also think it's preferable to have different rooms or different sections of the home on different breakers. We're encouraged to split between floor levels but imo splitting between sections or rooms is much more preferable.
 
So flex is dangerous? Not sure the cpc 'detects' anything.
Flex demands different requirements and it's clear you were refering to UK flat profiles.

I didn't say any cable was 'dangerous', I said it was less safe and more expensive. No strawmen please.

The cpc is used to carry fault current, which may be to do with an appliance and not the cable's insulation.
Yes, I know.
 
Like a ring upstairs and one downstairs
Bad practice, in my opinion. I wire a downstairs room with the rooms above it. Uses less cable and allows power upstairs and down even if a circuit is out of operation. Tht power may not be in the room you require it, but it won't be far away.
 

Reply to Have the rules for ring mains changed over the years? in the Electrical Engineering Chat area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
373
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
938
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Joining the ends of the radials together to form a ring, and changing the circuit protection to a single 32A would solve the MCB overload problem...
Replies
8
Views
775
Many thanks. Very clear!
Replies
2
Views
206

Search Electricans Forums by Tags

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top