High Ze on PME question | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss High Ze on PME question in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Gavin John Hyde

-
Esteemed
Arms
Patron
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
3,809
Reaction score
5,768
Location
Somerset
Come across this on instagram this morning.
Any thoughts? Dont have much experience of generators myself,
In terms of this question my thoughts were additonal or secondary supply source with a rod skewing readings? Not sure though. Would somebody with experience of generators explain?

[ElectriciansForums.net] High Ze on PME question
 
I think the op is saying mains installation is pme

That is the problem with back up generators people fit them and do not cheak readings and results ensuring breakers / switchgear would be suitable when on back up
 
I imagine the standby generator has its own local electrode and the CPC of the installation is connected both to the DNO's PME and to the generator's electrode (plus bonding to any other conductive parts in between such as the changeover switch cabinet, generator casing and armouring of the SWA between the genset and the c/o switch.)

Is the 1.96Ω reading a Ze of just the DNO supply with all parallel paths removed, is it the DNO supply plus the standby set with the complete earthing arrangement, minus other parallel paths?
 
You can't have the generator earthing arrangement connected to the DNO supply because an internal fault when running on the generator may direct voltage back to the DNO supply on which someone may be working.
Therefore I would expect a changeover switch has been operated to take power from the generator and the Earth resistance for the generator earthing is 1.96Ω.
The PME supply is cut off by the changeover switch.
 
You can't have the generator earthing arrangement connected to the DNO supply because an internal fault when running on the generator may direct voltage back to the DNO supply on which someone may be working.

Understood, @Richard Burns So is my understanding correct as below, on the basis the changeover switch only switches the two or four live conductors (depending on whether single or three phase) and not the CPC:
  • Generator enclosure & SWA = TT
  • The installation always utilises the DNO's PME at all times, irrespective of position of the c/o switch
  • The changeover switch cabinet should be bonded to the PME, as this earth will be of lesser resistance
  • The SWA armouring from the generator to the c/o switch should only be terminated at the supply end and specifically NOT terminated at the c/o cabinet inlet, to ensure separation of the local and DNO earthing paths
 
The earth fault loop path for whichever supply is being used, must be complete.
When the DNO supply is in use, the generator supply becomes an extraneous conductive-part, and as such requires bonding to the DNO supply earth.
The only acceptable method to divorce the two supply earths is to use a changeover switch which will disconnect the DNO earth at the same time as the live conductors.
 
The earth fault loop path for whichever supply is being used, must be complete.
When the DNO supply is in use, the generator supply becomes an extraneous conductive-part, and as such requires bonding to the DNO supply earth.
That was my original understanding, however I do understand Richard's scenario, which is essentially the reverse of the often discussed issue of exporting a PME earth outside its equipotential zone and the difference in potential between the exported earth and mother earth, under a fault condition on the DNO side. In this case, the issue is a fault on the client side at the generator, with the DNO operative subject to the rise in potential at the DNO end of the PME.

The only acceptable method to divorce the two supply earths is to use a changeover switch which will disconnect the DNO earth at the same time as the live conductors.
Most changeover switches, certainly all those that I've seen, only switch live conductors. I understand you could use switch the supply earths, however this doesn't overcome the extraneous aspect.
 
Most generator set ups I’ve been involved with that weren’t automatic had the earth permanently connected with a link on the earth bar that had to be removed when switching the generator over.

Not sure about AMF as I’ve never really worked on them.
 
Understood, @Richard Burns So is my understanding correct as below, on the basis the changeover switch only switches the two or four live conductors (depending on whether single or three phase) and not the CPC:
  • Generator enclosure & SWA = TT
  • The installation always utilises the DNO's PME at all times, irrespective of position of the c/o switch
  • The changeover switch cabinet should be bonded to the PME, as this earth will be of lesser resistance
  • The SWA armouring from the generator to the c/o switch should only be terminated at the supply end and specifically NOT terminated at the c/o cabinet inlet, to ensure separation of the local and DNO earthing paths
I am thinking that you could for example have something like the below diagram.
When the TNCS supply stops the changeover switch is operated, the earth link removed and the generator started.
When the TNCS supply is restored the generator is stopped, the earth link replaced and the changeover switch operated.

When running from the DNO supply the generator earth is bonded as an extraneous conductive part to the supply earth by the generator earthing conductor.
When running from the generator the link is removed so the Line, Neutral and Earth from the DNO supply are isolated from the installation.
[ElectriciansForums.net] High Ze on PME question

As I was drawing this I have realised that the alternative solution to the question in the OP is that the earth link has been removed from the installation even though the DNO supply is still connected leaving the installation as a TT system. Assuming the protection for the installation is correctly set up to be suitable for either supply this should not cause danger to the installation but would be a less effective means of protection than to use the DNO supply earthing.
 
I am thinking that you could for example have something like the below diagram.
When the TNCS supply stops the changeover switch is operated, the earth link removed and the generator started.
When the TNCS supply is restored the generator is stopped, the earth link replaced and the changeover switch operated.

When running from the DNO supply the generator earth is bonded as an extraneous conductive part to the supply earth by the generator earthing conductor.
When running from the generator the link is removed so the Line, Neutral and Earth from the DNO supply are isolated from the installation.
View attachment 46636
As I was drawing this I have realised that the alternative solution to the question in the OP is that the earth link has been removed from the installation even though the DNO supply is still connected leaving the installation as a TT system. Assuming the protection for the installation is correctly set up to be suitable for either supply this should not cause danger to the installation but would be a less effective means of protection than to use the DNO supply earthing.
In such a scenario, I would expect the EFLI to be lower via the generator than via the DNO supply.
Only ways I would see the EFLI being higher, is if there is no Neutral/Earth link at the generator and earth rods were installed, or if a Neutral/Earth resistor was installed.
 

Reply to High Ze on PME question in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
380
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
956
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Good thinking - the other side of that is my garage and also where the gas comes in so probably quite a tidy solution if it comes to it!
2
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Question
I think I might be tempted to test this theory, if it can be done without causing danger to anyone.
Replies
11
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top