OP
Badged01
Re: High zs readings low ez readings
I most certainly do, sure you do? Have a read of BS7671/GN3 for approved/correct testing methods, you might be suprised .......
Never said they were the same, the discussion is around "live" v "dead" Zs and how you can calculate the value using Ze and (R1+R2). And no they (Zs) dont equal the same value for a variety of reasons, which is another reason why the the "dead" (R1+R2) should be the method of choice.
But the level of difference will be low in the overall picture. Try doing some controlled testing of electrical joint resistances at various level of connectivity. Aside from almost loose you will again be suprised ......
Correct point, exactly what I taught students but not a reason to justify "live" testing. If you have parallel paths then your "live" Zs reading should be lower because of it. Hence with the (R1+R2) test you are getting a worst case scenario which is what you want to know should any of these parallel paths fail. You do the same for the Ze value, remove parallel paths before testing.
The skill of the tester can make his connections so that he includes these, terminations, resistances thro' circuit breakers etc. Think about it, Im sure you can fathom out how to do it ......
"Electricity kills, 'dead' testing should be the method of choice"
Jesus Christ almighty, you don't understand the basics of why we carry these tests out?
I most certainly do, sure you do? Have a read of BS7671/GN3 for approved/correct testing methods, you might be suprised .......
A Zs test and an R1+R2 test are different things entirely. The result almost never equals the calculated value.
Never said they were the same, the discussion is around "live" v "dead" Zs and how you can calculate the value using Ze and (R1+R2). And no they (Zs) dont equal the same value for a variety of reasons, which is another reason why the the "dead" (R1+R2) should be the method of choice.
A Zs test passes a relatively high current through the circuit which will identify any poor connections far better than the low current continuity test.
But the level of difference will be low in the overall picture. Try doing some controlled testing of electrical joint resistances at various level of connectivity. Aside from almost loose you will again be suprised ......
The Zs test will give you the impedance including all paralell paths so a circuit tested this way may pass when the calculation method fails it.
Correct point, exactly what I taught students but not a reason to justify "live" testing. If you have parallel paths then your "live" Zs reading should be lower because of it. Hence with the (R1+R2) test you are getting a worst case scenario which is what you want to know should any of these parallel paths fail. You do the same for the Ze value, remove parallel paths before testing.
The Zs test will include all of the terminations in the CU and the protective devices, highlighting any faults which could start one of these CU fires we are hearing so much about.
The skill of the tester can make his connections so that he includes these, terminations, resistances thro' circuit breakers etc. Think about it, Im sure you can fathom out how to do it ......
"Electricity kills, 'dead' testing should be the method of choice"