B
bradburts
That would be great.
I have been researching some more & the following seems relevant:
1) (1974) Load management detailed in U.S. Patents 4,241,237 and 4,455,453 and Canadian Patent 1,155,243 (Apparatus and Method for Remote Sensor Monitoring, Metering and Control)
2) 'Smart grid' as used in 2005 "Toward A Smart Grid", authored by S. Massoud Amin and Bruce F. Wollenberg appeared in the September/October issue of IEEE P&E Magazine (Vol. 3, No.5, pgs 34–41)
Seems to me that the EMMA system is a form of 'economic demand response' that is to say it costs you nothing to use the PV and costs you to use the grid. Selecting one supply or the other is therefore an economic demand response.
I was very happy to find that load managment has been discussed since 1974. I think therefore that there is nothing to worry us in the patent, just the difference between macro and micro grids.
I also found reference to office lighting systems which dimmed as a response to grid load.
http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/resources/newsroom/pdf/2004/LoadShed.pdf
I suppose therefore/also that I/we could offer systems which dimmed lights (say a 3KW system for those with big houses) when PV output was low & before we start to tax our fragile grid.
The light is not an energy store (as discussed by EMMA) and light dimming has been done before, see link above.
Of course I would be powerless to stop someone fitting the dimming device to an immersion heater..........
Think inie meanie was right. Would be great to have a proffessional's view though!
I have been researching some more & the following seems relevant:
1) (1974) Load management detailed in U.S. Patents 4,241,237 and 4,455,453 and Canadian Patent 1,155,243 (Apparatus and Method for Remote Sensor Monitoring, Metering and Control)
2) 'Smart grid' as used in 2005 "Toward A Smart Grid", authored by S. Massoud Amin and Bruce F. Wollenberg appeared in the September/October issue of IEEE P&E Magazine (Vol. 3, No.5, pgs 34–41)
Seems to me that the EMMA system is a form of 'economic demand response' that is to say it costs you nothing to use the PV and costs you to use the grid. Selecting one supply or the other is therefore an economic demand response.
I was very happy to find that load managment has been discussed since 1974. I think therefore that there is nothing to worry us in the patent, just the difference between macro and micro grids.
I also found reference to office lighting systems which dimmed as a response to grid load.
http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/resources/newsroom/pdf/2004/LoadShed.pdf
I suppose therefore/also that I/we could offer systems which dimmed lights (say a 3KW system for those with big houses) when PV output was low & before we start to tax our fragile grid.
The light is not an energy store (as discussed by EMMA) and light dimming has been done before, see link above.
Of course I would be powerless to stop someone fitting the dimming device to an immersion heater..........
Think inie meanie was right. Would be great to have a proffessional's view though!