I looked at this just before Christmas due to concerns over my own installation and concluded that the current regulations weren't clear, but that the new draft regulations clarified things.
As I recall (and this is a laymans view), the current regulations seem to be that if the inverter and CU are in different locations you need some form of isolator at both and that there should be a lockable isolator should "in an accessible location, e.g. the by the CU"
i.e. near the CU is an example of a suitable location for a lockable isolator but not the only option. It seemed therefore to depend whether a lockable isolator next to an inverter in say a loft was "an accessible location".
As I recall (and this is a laymans view), the current regulations seem to be that if the inverter and CU are in different locations you need some form of isolator at both and that there should be a lockable isolator should "in an accessible location, e.g. the by the CU"
i.e. near the CU is an example of a suitable location for a lockable isolator but not the only option. It seemed therefore to depend whether a lockable isolator next to an inverter in say a loft was "an accessible location".