UK Kitchen grid switch help

[ibra123]

Hello everyone, I'd like to seek your input on a matter. I'm in the process of designing the electrical connections for the following kitchen appliances:

Hob
Oven (below 2kW)
Fridge/Freezer
Dishwasher
Washing machine
Extract Hood

For the hob, I intend to connect it to a cooker connection unit (located below the counter) and then to a 45A cooker unit (above the counter) on a dedicated circuit.

As for the remaining appliances, my plan is to wire them to unswitched 13A sockets (positioned below the counter) and then connect them to a 6-Gang grid switch, which will be part of a 32A ring circuit.

Now, I have concerns about the potential load being too high for a single circuit. Is it possible to establish two separate circuits for the grid switch without the need for an ugly warning notice?

Additionally, I've been pondering whether placing all these appliances on a 32A ring circuit might result in the 13A fuse in the appliance plug blowing first in case of an overcurrent issue. This would require users to remove the appliance and replace the fuse. Any thoughts on this matter?

 

[nicebutdim]

Appliance

If I am protecting several appliances that have plugs with 13A fuses and a 32A RCBO ring at the DB, wouldn't the 13A fuse blow first if there was an overload due to one of the appliances?

How would you circuit the above listed appliances?

The situation you describe applies to an appliance overload regardless of circuit type or rating, but is highly unlikely to occur. Short circuit is more likely and would probably take out circuit protection at board than appliance fuse.

 

[oscar21]

Honestly I don't know why people mess about with grid switches, they must be the hardest thing to fit in a domestic situation, every make I've come across has something stupid about them. The MK ones need a yoke and the switches keep popping out of them, same for other designs, others have screw terminals that are not up to the task of taking two 2.5 cables and most never look entirely straight when you put them on.

We occasionally have to fit them as per a spec and the only one I'll even consider fitting now is a click grid pro one, even the mini grid from click is pants.

So it begs the question as to why people chose them, sockets inside cupboards without any sort of extra isolator anywhere is by far the best bet in my opinion. I remember a Thomas Nagy video where he fitted one and he used a 20A switch marked "HOB" to operate a contactor back near the consumer unit which switched the 6mm to the hob, as if they aren't complicated enough.

 

[Dustydazzler]

I have been doing domestics since the late 1990s and I was under the impression the big ole kitchen grids became popular on new builds because it was cheaper and quicker to fit a single 6 or 9 way grid than to fix a whole load of swi fuse spurs all over the kitchen

that said as above I prefer to fit surface boxes inside units for appliances and keep everything as much as possible out of view

 

[baldelectrician]

I prefer to put a bank of DP switches in a cupboard next to the kitchen (there is usually a tall hall cupboard next to the kitchen)
Other times we put switches in adjacent to the consumer unit- all labelled. A bit more cable, easier to wire and also easier to put different appliances on different circuits.

 

[littlespark]

I was always taught that the isolation switches had to be accessible for emergency’s…. not hidden away in cupboards.

Whether that be on a grid, or all individual.

I believe there’s a Scottish building reg about this that doesn’t exist on the English side??

 

[ibra123]

I was always taught that the isolation switches had to be accessible for emergency’s…. not hidden away in cupboards.

Whether that be on a grid, or all individual.

I believe there’s a Scottish building reg about this that doesn’t exist on the English side??

In my view, this is accurate. Part M of the building regulations focuses on ensuring 'visibility' for individuals with disabilities and specifies that all controls and sockets in a kitchen must be easily reachable. This implies that switches and outlets should be positioned above countertops and outside cabinets. What are your thoughts on this?

 

[DPG]

In my view, this is accurate. Part M of the building regulations focuses on ensuring 'visibility' for individuals with disabilities and specifies that all controls and sockets in a kitchen must be easily reachable. This implies that switches and outlets should be positioned above countertops and outside cabinets. What are your thoughts on this?

Too many people these days are obsessed with not having isolators on show. Leading to people putting them in cupboards, often with stuff piled up against them.

It's a kitchen, not an art gallery. Does it really matter that there is a 20A switch above the worktop?

 

[ibra123]

It's a kitchen, not an art gallery.

Next time an architect/client asks whether we can keep sockets hidden in kitchen cabinets, I will say this :')

 

[Dustydazzler]

I do quite a lot of kitchen re-fits and near all clients demand no switches and sockets on show except for the ones they will actually plug stuff into/ so 99% of the time I do go down the 'put everything in a near by cupboard route. to be fair it also probably saves me about 1/2 day less labour chopping boxes into brick walls.

 

[richy3333]

Building Standards wording. The handbook doesn't define 'accessible':

Electrical fixtures - outlets and controls of electrical fixtures and systems should be positioned at least 350 mm from any internal corner, projecting wall or similar obstruction and, unless the need for a higher location can be demonstrated, not more than 1.2 m above floor level. This would include fixtures such as sockets, switches, fire alarm call points and timer controls or programmers. Within this height range:

• light switches should be positioned at a height of between 900 mm and 1.1 m above floor level

• standard switched or unswitched socket outlets and outlets for other services such as telephone or television should be positioned at least 400 mm above floor level. Above an obstruction, such as a worktop, fixtures should be at least 150 mm above the projecting surface



Where sockets are concealed, such as to the rear of white goods in a kitchen, separate switching should be provided in an accessible position, to allow appliances to be isolated.

 

[pc1966]

Where sockets are concealed, such as to the rear of white goods in a kitchen, separate switching should be provided in an accessible position, to allow appliances to be isolated.

To me in a cupboard is not "accessible" for two reasons:

1. It will get filled with crap, obscuring the switches.
2. It is not obvious to anyone in an emergency who is not familiar with the kitchen (guest, AirBnB tenant, etc). As those switches are rarely used, probably the owner/occupier will be unfamiliar with the exact location or purpose as well.

I would put them above the appliance they switch (if under the work area) or immediately to the side (if tall like a fridge/freezer) as then it is clear what they are likely to do, even if they are not labelled.

 

[oscar21]

Part M doesn't mean that every single socket in the house has to be at 450mm, it means that an adequate number of sockets are accessible for disabled or immobile people. If you put 4 twins in a living room then you would be ok fitting two of them at 450 and the other two at 300mm or whatever it may be. And this only applies to new builds.

In existing premises all you have to make sure of is you don't make the property any worse than it already is, so if all the existing sockets are at 300mm then you can do the same, even in extensions. also I don't agree with sockets inside cupboards being inaccessible, so you have to move a few boxes of cornflakes, whats your view on sockets behind a couch or a bed that weights half a ton?

 

[nicebutdim]

I don't agree with sockets inside cupboards being inaccessible, so you have to move a few boxes of cornflakes, whats your view on sockets behind a couch or a bed that weights half a ton?

Sockets behind a bed or couch weren't intentionally fitted there. I would guess homeowners might prefer those sockets to be beside couches and beds.

There's clearly room for debate about what exactly accessible means, but there's no doubt that an above counter point of isolation would be more readily accessible, should a cheaply constructed appliance spontaneously combust, than one located behind half a hundredweight of crockery. In many cases it would be as easy to pull the appliance out and unplug it, than get at a cupboard mounted isolator, so I guess one might argue in those instances it could be considered inaccessible and self-defeating.

 

[nicebutdim]

To add to the above; we aren't moving isolation from above the worktop for any reason other than the whims of customers. While some people reckon the customer is always right, I'd contend that many are actually dick heads who are just about sensible enough to not eat themselves.

 

[oscar21]

Oh I agree about customers, whoever stated "the customer is always right" must be a loony. Customers are hardly ever right, even a stopped clock is usually correct more often than the customer.