OP
accordfire
Agree to the above. One thing that I think would help is that all schools finish at the age of 18. Normal schooling up to 16 then a directional learning just like college up until your 18? Then from 18 - 21 a formal college system and then university. Yes this would mean more costs from the tax payer but how much would be saved by not having to pay benefits to single teenage mums and 17 year old smack heads? A bit strong I know but I believe it would be better in the long run. Another option is some form of national service, military or academic giving some form of direction to a young persons life.
That's a big part of what I was aiming at - the lack of direction our kids leave school with, and the whole culture toward it being OK to be a single mother, in a council house, and no hope of ever achieving anything, other than spending just long enough with some jumped up little tearaway long enough to get pregnant again.
Sadly, one of the few ways we're ever going to get the culture of family back is by teaching it to youngsters. Community also needs to be taught now, sadly, as it's all but died in many parts of the UK. It would be nice to see concessions given to restoring high streets with proper shops - like butchers, greengrocers, and proper iron mongers. I'd be happy to pay a bit more for proper meat instead of that junk they sell (and can't even label right) in Tesco.
My idea for a national service was more along the lines of a "community" service - essentially making kids take responsibility for their communities, putting single parents in dormitory type places under a proper Matron type, allowing these mothers the chance to learn to do it properly, with support, and a chance to work part time to pay their way.
Lads in this age group, meanwhile should be worked hard, for a wage, sufficient to give them a sense of discipline, and also with education on working for a living and getting on with others, instead of what they do now.
I am in favour of some sort of national service though.