E
EastAnglian
I've just started work to "upgrade" an old installation, which also involves taking out some earlier sub-standard work. Basic description:
Rural farm house & outbuildings - overhead single phase supply - 3 phase transformer on pole in adjacent field.
Supply arrives in an outbuilding, from which then run sub-mains to the farm house and barns. TT system, Ze of earth electrode at the outbuilding with the service head & meter 21 ohms, luvlly jubbly. Sub-mains are wired in 3 core SWA with one core acting as CPC.
At the buildings being served some have an additional earth electrode, some don't. I want to achieve some consistency in the system and its my intent to have an earth electrode for each building, suitable installed close to the DB etc.
The question then, simply is should I use the CPC (and the armour) to connect together the multiple earth electrodes, thereby creating a single equipotential zone across the installation or should each building be an equipotential zone in its own right, without the earthing terminals being connected to each other, but simply connected to their own local earth electrode?
Intuition is saying to me that multiple earth electrodes provide a degree of redundancy, so long as the CPCs are adequately sized to carry the potential earth fault current.
Rural farm house & outbuildings - overhead single phase supply - 3 phase transformer on pole in adjacent field.
Supply arrives in an outbuilding, from which then run sub-mains to the farm house and barns. TT system, Ze of earth electrode at the outbuilding with the service head & meter 21 ohms, luvlly jubbly. Sub-mains are wired in 3 core SWA with one core acting as CPC.
At the buildings being served some have an additional earth electrode, some don't. I want to achieve some consistency in the system and its my intent to have an earth electrode for each building, suitable installed close to the DB etc.
The question then, simply is should I use the CPC (and the armour) to connect together the multiple earth electrodes, thereby creating a single equipotential zone across the installation or should each building be an equipotential zone in its own right, without the earthing terminals being connected to each other, but simply connected to their own local earth electrode?
Intuition is saying to me that multiple earth electrodes provide a degree of redundancy, so long as the CPCs are adequately sized to carry the potential earth fault current.