R
rsmck
We've recently bought a property which needs rewired - I'm not an electrician by trade but have a good understanding of electrics and am brushing up on the 17th edition - we intend to do much of the work ourselves partially as a cash-saving exercise but also for the experience (i've rewired part of a flat before, never a full house!)
Having not moved in yet I only have one small photo of the existing installation (attached) and i'm a little confused by the 4 tails that appear to come from the cut out where I'd normally only expect two.
It's also very hard to determine the earthing arrangement - TT seems likely but the earth conductor does disappear down the same hole at the supply cable comes from so I can't see where it goes from there (it could be connected to something for equipotential bonding)
Can anyone think of a reason there may be two sets of tails from the cut out ?
The intention is to rewire entirely and fit a 100A isolator after the meter to facilitate easier isolation in the future and a new 17th Edition compliant CU - all existing will be replaced as much of it is rubber rather than PVC and is degraded visibly in various places, especially the attic.
Having not moved in yet I only have one small photo of the existing installation (attached) and i'm a little confused by the 4 tails that appear to come from the cut out where I'd normally only expect two.
It's also very hard to determine the earthing arrangement - TT seems likely but the earth conductor does disappear down the same hole at the supply cable comes from so I can't see where it goes from there (it could be connected to something for equipotential bonding)
Can anyone think of a reason there may be two sets of tails from the cut out ?
The intention is to rewire entirely and fit a 100A isolator after the meter to facilitate easier isolation in the future and a new 17th Edition compliant CU - all existing will be replaced as much of it is rubber rather than PVC and is degraded visibly in various places, especially the attic.
Last edited by a moderator: