napit code 2/3 | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

NAPIT Certification Scheme napit code 2/3

Discuss napit code 2/3 in the Certification NICEIC, NAPIT, Stroma, BECSA Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

C3 for me, in general.
Maybe we're getting to the point, though, if the property was wired to later 17th, C2 could come into it.....but in such a case it should be RCD protected anyway...so there's already a C2 for that. If you think about it, you could save an awful lot of C2's with an RCBO. As regards zones, why would you want to check them for an EICR?...unless the plaster's falling off the wall and showing things up.
 
C3 for me, in general.
Maybe we're getting to the point, though, if the property was wired to later 17th, C2 could come into it.....but in such a case it should be RCD protected anyway...so there's already a C2 for that. If you think about it, you could save an awful lot of C2's with an RCBO. As regards zones, why would you want to check them for an EICR?...unless some of the plaster's falling off the wall.
That's why I put it on here as I couldn't understand
 
I don't believe that installation date should come into it. Assess the risk and code accordingly. And lack of RCD additional protection where now required cannot be given no recommendation code.
 
C2 in you’re opinion?
I certainly wasn't suggesting that! But was correcting someone who advised no code and someone else who suggested that a 17th Edition install should be C2 (implying that older installs shouldn't). It would be a C3 for me.
 
I certainly wasn't suggesting that! But was correcting someone who advised no code and someone else who suggested that a 17th Edition install should be C2 (implying that older installs shouldn't). It would be a C3 for me.
Agree with that statement
 
I certainly wasn't suggesting that! But was correcting someone who advised no code and someone else who suggested that a 17th Edition install should be C2 (implying that older installs shouldn't). It would be a C3 for me.
I'm not saying it should, Risty, I'm saying it could...as in pointing out the RCD requirement anyway. If I decided on a C2, it'd be a C2, be it prior to 17th or not.
I repeat, C3, generally.
 

Reply to napit code 2/3 in the Certification NICEIC, NAPIT, Stroma, BECSA Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
706
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
3K

Similar threads

Thanks for the reply littlespark. Yes the works have been carried out. Surely it is fraudulent because basically the document is Not...
Replies
2
Views
838
Here the BPG#4 is useful, it is not a statutory document at all, but it provides good guidance as to what can reasonably considered as C1/C2/C3...
Replies
11
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top