Nasty little mess again ! | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Nasty little mess again ! in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Soulsurfer

-
Arms
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
623
Reaction score
163
Location
Channel Islands
So a regular client has just had me finish doing up their flat and bought a house, been and while quoting for LED downlight etc.. they asked to have all the accessories changed out new and a few bits looked at, while there on site they showed me a cert hand written from a contractor to move boiler feed in garage and connect for E20+ off peak heating etc..

Boiler wasn't operating so found a cut out gone and HW valve defective so replaced it. All good.

Now they want a full EICR due to feeling uneasy about the place electrics as the CU for the general supply and off peak supply is a mess and a half ! Started testing this morning, Ze seemed a bit low but was o.k. tried PSSC and got 10kA !

seemed very over the top for domestic 3 bed house ! so went to try at 4 pole switch isolator and upon testing there got an arc flash when testing ? Never seen that before !

Next issue doing all usual dead tests and alright except from one ring final was low on r2,
r1 fine 0.57
rn 0.56 but
r2 was only very slightly different 0.54 but was looking for more especially on Twin cable ! maybe 0.95 or so.
Could there be a parallel path somewhere ?

1st floor ring
r1 0.29, rn 0.30, r2 0.50 so much more what I was looking for.

Problems again surfaced when attempting IR ! at main terminals on switch at CU and out to CPC's all >500MegOhms
but individually only cooker circuit and Immersion were the same !
The rings x 2 and lights x 2 plus a boiler feed all wouldn't test past the 50V touch voltage limit I think on mft.
No matter whether disconnected from mcb and Neut bars etc.. and even L+N together to earth bar nothing would let the voltage ramp up to test at 100, 250 or 500V, checked over and over for spurs, extra hidden sockets, things plugged in etc.. and found nothing from what I can gather apart from an RCD incorporated socket last thing as leaving site but thought probably wouldn't be a problem as same issue happened when trying to IR test other circuits too !

Anyone shed any light on this as I've also found live ends taped up in 2 x socket back boxes and not in a socket face and more with spurred cables disappearing into stud wall with no idea where they are going to ! I'm thinking someone has been having a right old play around and no certificates anywhere.

CU is old MK 59 series horrible thing I'll put pics on if possible it's a right mess. On main switch is 5560, each mcb is say 5930 for a 30A etc.. had to get from obsolete breaker dealer last time I had to work on one of these boards.
 
A low Ze would lead to a high PSCC, just do the calculation to check that it is reasonable for the recorded Ze.

When you say arc flash do you mean a small spark when making contact with the probes or something more serious?

Most mfts will not IR test a circuit if a voltage is detected above a certain limit, which may display an error with a >50 type of symbol. If you have tested global IR and the reading was at the top end of the scale then the cables will act as a capacitor and charge up to full test voltage, this can prevent the meter from testing again until this energy is discharged.
 
IMG_8909.JPG IMG_8910.JPG IMG_8916.JPG IMG_8917.JPG IMG_8918.JPG IMG_8919.JPG Hi
A low Ze would lead to a high PSCC, just do the calculation to check that it is reasonable for the recorded Ze.

When you say arc flash do you mean a small spark when making contact with the probes or something more serious?

Most mfts will not IR test a circuit if a voltage is detected above a certain limit, which may display an error with a >50 type of symbol. If you have tested global IR and the reading was at the top end of the scale then the cables will act as a capacitor and charge up to full test voltage, this can prevent the meter from testing again until this energy is discharged.

It was weird Dave the flash was quite a bright blue flash after test button pressed to initiate a Zs high current L-N at the 4 pole switch for off peak & general supply board. It was quite a while after global IR that I tried the other IR tests but just seemed really worrying that none would ramp up and the cu main switch was open and the 4 pole supply switch in meter box was opened also to ensure all dead everywhere.

Haven't done a calculation at all yet, but Ze at general cu was 0.07 ohms with a 3.5kA PEFC.
 
I make it around 3.3kA for Ipf but if way lower say Ze of 0.02 that would give the region of 10/11kA I had registering on the MFT. Totally confused now or is meter low on batteries / really bad install ?
 
Bad install should not reflect upon the Ze, 0.07 isn't low.

Ah the only few times I've tested myself since going on my own I've had higher Ze test results like around the 0.20 etc.. so going to 0.07 I thought was low. My lack of knowledge unfortunately. But seems a very high PSSC, and the pics show how horrible the wiring is.
 
The PSSC is high for 0.07, does your meter measure it separately or calculate it from Ze.
It was on the Fluke 1653B I just sold, I would think it measures it direct as have to manually select across to L & N on screen not as is default on L & E for Ze which then gives the Ohm result then I think calculates the PEFC below in window at same time,
LN selected manually on screen then gives PSSC below when probes are making contact.
 

Reply to Nasty little mess again ! in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Hi everyone, If you are looking for reliable EV chargers, check out our top-rated selection at E2GO! ⚡ Please note that all EV Chargers and...
Replies
0
Views
190
  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K

Similar threads

Often, but not always: 543.2.9 Except where the circuit protective conductor is formed by a metal covering or enclosure containing all of the...
2
Replies
23
Views
963
Yup will do exactly that when I'm back down there. Thanks for the help
Replies
6
Views
488

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top