no earth | Page 14 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss no earth in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

S

sima24

Hi, been to look at a rewire today and no earth connection at all. Tried to contact supply company to enquire weather the property is connected to a pme system but no joy after holding most the afternoon. I presume supply company doesnt have to supply an earth but just wondering if they would upgrade to pme or not? Or possibly it is a pme system but earth has been disconnected at some point (no sign of pme label tho) any views appreciated. Thanks.
 
You are permitted to have a Ze for a TT supply up to 200 ohms - Above 200 ohms it may become unstable..
but you wouldn`t though....would you...lol
Oh yes he would, cause the BGB told him so!! lol!!
So considering my Ra was 125 in the first place I should have left it then, but I didn't!
Anyway I'm not bothering to waste any any more time discussing the subject (I see no-one could be bothered to answer my questions), as it is descending into taking the ---- and ignoring genuine discussion, as usual.
 
Bearing in mind with my service bonding connected I am getting 0.45 I'm satisfied I have a good EFL path.

Have i missed something along the way??? Why are you installing a TT system if you have a Ze at the service cut-out of 0.45??

And no-ones taking the ----, you asked for advise got it, and then you start pulling it apart to suit yourself!!
 
Yes you have missed something. It is an existing TT system of which I was upgrading the rod as it was giving 125 ohms, which technically satisfies the BGB, but it reality is a bit rubbish. The 0.45 is the resistance of my bonded pipework (underground gas and water pipes) when tested without the earth stake (new or old) connected, not the service head. As I know we shouldn't rely on bonding for our earth path I set about replacing the rod, which got it down to 44.

I was joking about peeling back the plastic off my incoming cable and wrapping the earth wire around the armour.
 
Yes you have missed something. It is an existing TT system of which I was upgrading the rod as it was giving 125 ohms, which technically satisfies the BGB, but it reality is a bit rubbish. The 0.45 is the resistance of my bonded pipework (underground gas and water pipes) when tested without the earth stake (new or old) connected, not the service head. As I know we shouldn't rely on bonding for our earth path I set about replacing the rod, which got it down to 44.

I was joking about peeling back the plastic off my incoming cable and wrapping the earth wire around the armour.
so lets say you got just within 200....
would you be satisfied with this...?
as far as BS7671 is concerned its good....
but its time to ask yourself what you truely believe....
 
so lets say you got just within 200....
would you be satisfied with this...?
as far as BS7671 is concerned its good....
but its time to ask yourself what you truely believe....

The tooth fairys actually a fit blonde 20something.

Father Christmas is real, but an incline tells me he's related to Gary Glitter.

The Easter Bunny is just a bored office ----, wanting a change of career.

& Ed Miliband is Wallace from Wallace and Grommit.
 
Well, if he's not happy with 125 ohms, then why would he be happy with 'just under 200 ohms'? I don't get where you're going with this? Daz
 
Well, if he's not happy with 125 ohms, then why would he be happy with 'just under 200 ohms'? I don't get where you're going with this? Daz
i`m just being picky...
no , really what i mean is the regs state 200 ohms....totally ridiculous...
even 100 would be pants...
well planned and sited rods can return almost TN levels .....
 
Well, if he's not happy with 125 ohms, then why would he be happy with 'just under 200 ohms'? I don't get where you're going with this? Daz
At least one person can see why I'm getting exasperated! I wasn't happy with 125, so upgraded the rod, and they ignore that and still say

"would you be happy with it?"
"Oh yes he would, cause the BGB told him so!! lol!!"

And when the existing rod is in a rubble-free position they still want me to move it a metre down the garden to avoid non-existent rubble. Now who's blindly following the regs?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At least one person can see why I'm getting exasperated! I wasn't happy with 125, so upgraded the rod, and they ignore that and still say

"would you be happy with it?"
"Oh yes he would, cause the BGB told him so!! lol!!"

And when the existing rod is in a rubble-free position they still want me to move it a metre down the garden to avoid non-existent rubble. Now who's blindly following the regs?
this isn`t in the regs strops....
 

Reply to no earth in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar threads

  • Question
Better/Smart/intelligent/expensive generators require two earth spikes set ~10-15m apart. They check the resistance between spikes and will...
Replies
5
Views
1K
When I was on the electric board We had a pair of pillocks connect a housing estate to a very large genset, the n lead was in two parts and not...
2
Replies
28
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top