well companies should pay more,they are the ones that benefit the most,if thatcher hadnt sold off the council housing stock there would be affordable housing,
Kinda shows maybe you didn't read what I wrote........
The bit where I said.....unions chasing employers......APART from the ones who CAN AFFORD IT........I don't see how that disagrees with your view my friend.
Or is it that you believe you start a business and automatically become rich? Surely not.....
Reason I ask, is because union interference cost a mate of mine a damn good business a while back......claiming that a total chancer, who just happened to have union membership was getting shafted when he got the sack. Thing is he wasn't getting shafted at all. He was a lazy, no good chancer who thought the world owed him a living.
His actions, with union backing cost six people their jobs, and folded a business which was set to employ another fifteen. It also cost my friend everything he'd spent years working to build up, including his family's home.
On the other hand......I agree with you totally, AND ALSO POINTED out that every working man and woman in this country should have a right to a LIVING wage - the difference is, that most of us in business (over 75%) are SMALL businesses - my profit margins don't always allow me to pay what I want my guys to have, but by god none of them goes hungry.
As for Margaret Thatcher selling off the housing stock - most Housing Association stock is rented at equivalent rates to "council" equivalents, and has strict rent rate legislation in place to prevent it over charging. I honestly don't know any place now that I could rent a three bedroom house at anything like the prices the Housing Associations round here charge - IRO ÂŁ500 pcm for HA rent, versus minimum ÂŁ750 private. How's that not affordable?
Perhaps your complaint isn't so much about coast as availability?
That being so, the figures for my local authority show that year on year, Housing Association stock has risen by around 5-10% against a national average of 7%. Where would you have the Associations build this housing, given that we no longer build High Rise flats - and are pulling them all down, rightly? Given that we also don't want to create even more ghettos, and poor quality housing built on former waste sites?
Perhaps the fault lies more in uncontrolled immigration than in "selling off" council housing to tightly regulated not for profit housing associations?