Part P

[Guest77]

It is a Building regulation, thats right a Building regulation, not a Electrical qualification. If you read it (you can download it on-line) then you will see that some works, and only some as it is getting less now needs to be notified to the local building control. Now there is nothing to suggest an Electrician need notify the local building control authority, nothing at all anywhere, this is a myth, and a myth we are all getting fed up with. The customer is duty bound to do this just like if they decided to have a loft conversion or indeed a extension on their home. To be competitive some electricians join a scheme so they can notify for the customer on their behalf and the fees are usually a couple of quid instead of the 2-300 the local authority would charge the customer if an Electrician didn't do it for them, this way the customer gets to save some money and the Electrician wins work. The schemes have a policy which they suggest if they get people to join them they will guarentee to the local authority the people they approve are competant, for this privilage they take 400-500 off these people, usually Electricians, but some Plumbers and Kitchen Fitters join as well, The local authority building control then accepts the fact the people on these schemes are competant and do not go out to site to inspect the works, this is why the cost is just an administrative one at a few quid and not hundreds. If you are a competant Electrician for example with a Gold card and plenty of experience why do you need to pay a scheme hundreds of pounds a year to have them tell the Local authority you are competant? If you are Competant then get stuck in and start work. If the work you do does need to be notified then you can ask the customer to do it or include an extra couple of hundred on top of your quote for you to do it. There is no judge in the whole of the UK who will find you guilty of anything wrong doing if you carry out work to BS7671 correctly without being a member of a scheme, we don't need them do we? so why are we paying them 500 a year? I can confirm I no longer pay them, I have left the NICEIC, I am competant, I have over 30 years experience, I will not give them 500 quid to tell someone else I am competant.


Please do not keep going on about being part p qualified, it is all Rollocks, rant over.

 

[amckay]

null

I'm not a scam member as I don't hold t+I quals at the mo. But aside from drastically reduced notifications, what do they offer?
-seriously reasonable answers chaps!

 

[GLENNSPARK]

I'm not a scam member as I don't hold t+I quals at the mo. But aside from drastically reduced notifications, what do they offer?
-seriously reasonable answers chaps!

your really struggling here arn`t you...

not with the fact you dont hold any inspection & testing quals....but the fact that you seem to seriously believe that you actually NEED such a qualification...to join one of these rackets...

last time i looked i thought it was all about competency...

this is a concern to me:
the idea (put about by the rackets) that you need to have this ticket & that ticket to operate safely....when in reality its all about whether your competent...or not

mind you the rackets have their own little agenda`s ...dont they....such as NAPIT with its "NAPIT 2391"....a worthless bit of arse paper if ever there was one....

 

[Geoffsd]

The shaded boxes are legal quotes.

That's what I said and there are only two in the whole document.

The document as a whole requires to be adhered to,

No, it doesn't.

Please read the preface and page i.
Note the number of times it says 'guidance'.

It is no more statutory than the On-Site GUIDE.

if not its illegal. Its a civil matter not criminal (don't mix the two up) the law is complex, I know because I study it as a hobby.

You now sound unsure. More studying required?
What is the legal meaning of 'guidance'?

Its a legal document but you have no legal obligation (in writing) to adhere to it, but are lawfully required to adhere to it. (Legal and lawful have two separate meanings)

Wtf does that mean?

Ask any solicitor to verify any of the above.

Why would I believe what they said?


You did say you hoped this thread would educate some people.

 

[Guest77]

I'm not a scam member as I don't hold t+I quals at the mo. But aside from drastically reduced notifications, what do they offer?
-seriously reasonable answers chaps!

Nothing, didn't you read my opening post?

 

[telectrix]

just when you thought life could not get any worse:

 

[Guest77]

This really is going off track now, I might have to ask Marvo to edit it and then close it lol

 

[GMES]

Are they mange tout on the floor to the right of the trap.

 

[GMES]

This really is going off track now, I might have to ask Marvo to edit it and then close it lol

Sorry Mike, so I'm guessing #22 doesn't help

 

[amckay]

I'm not a scam member as I don't hold t+I quals at the mo. But aside from drastically reduced notifications, what do they offer?
-seriously reasonable answers chaps!

your really struggling here arn`t you...

not with the fact you dont hold any inspection & testing quals....but the fact that you seem to seriously believe that you actually NEED such a qualification...to join one of these rackets...

last time i looked i thought it was all about competency...

this is a concern to me:
the idea (put about by the rackets) that you need to have this ticket & that ticket to operate safely....when in reality its all about whether your competent...or not

mind you the rackets have their own little agenda`s ...dont they....such as NAPIT with its "NAPIT 2391"....a worthless bit of arse paper if ever there was one....

I'm not struggling mate I agree with all of the above with 1 exception... I do not seriously believe I have to have a t+I qual to join a scam. I need to do the course so I am knowledgeable (albeit more) to be able to do it as I currently have a lack of experience in that area. I don't want it to use to join a scam, I want it to show an employer when I go for a job...
That as was ment to be and...sorry

 

[chcnorris29]

Would i be right to say that some form of licensing for competent sparks so that only licensed people can carry out electrical work (inc DIY) where there is no yearly fee or notification fees or crap and that electricians must be proved to be competent, licensed without the need for the scams?
Thanks

 

[amckay]

Would i be right to say that some form of licensing for competent sparks so that only licensed people can carry out electrical work (inc DIY) where there is no yearly fee or notification fees or crap and that electricians must be proved to be competent, licensed without the need for the scams?
Thanks

I think that is what a lot of forum members want too. I'm not sure of what kind of system required to implement it tho..
Maybe just stick with jib cards or have a card alongside it with a brand known to the gen public for easy recognition? Either way it needs to be as well advertised as as known as gas safe

 

[Manutd4life]

Would i be right to say that some form of licensing for competent sparks so that only licensed people can carry out electrical work (inc DIY) where there is no yearly fee or notification fees or crap and that electricians must be proved to be competent, licensed without the need for the scams?
Thanks

Scrap Part P and only have qualified sparks doing the work. Or the at the very least, you MUST have 17th edition or the latest one that is out. And then you can do other electrical courses.

 

[telectrix]

wrong way round. nobody should be allowed to take the 17th until after they have got a core qualification.

 

[amckay]

wrong way round. nobody should be allowed to take the 17th until after they have got a core qualification.

I agree with you tel.
I'm sure there was an "Indian" fella on here a while ago calling himself an electrician after passing 17th but asking how to do very basic things!
As stated in other threads 17th as we know is open book so anyone who can read can pass it but it doest teach the technical skills

 

[Gavin A]

I can add to the Part P fiasco, as most of you know I am industrial/commercial but have been asked by a friend to wire his new extension, so I agreed but explained I was not part p( he had no idea what this is ) I told him that because building control was involved we would have to go through them for signing it off, and there reply was that if I was 17th edition and I could supply a 17th certificate they would be ok with that. so my question is why are you all paying your subs to the parasites??

If building control were already involved with the job, then they could be notified of your work at no extra cost.

If you were just doing a straight new circuit in an existing house that requires notification, then how would you have notified building control about this work? Go direct and it'd be a lot more expensive per job than via a CPS.

By my reading of the legislation it's the person carrying out the work that is responsible for the notification, not the person paying to have the work done - ie it's the electrician who is responsible for ensuring the work is notified, with either building control or trading standards able to take action against you if you failed to comply with this.