Except..But both 544.1.1 and 54.8 have the caveat "except where PME conditions apply"
That is the crux of the matter.
I take it to mean if the conductors are part of the PME system (i.e. the combined part) then table 54.8 and 10mm^2 or 6mm^2 etc do not apply, and no figures are specified within the wiring regs.
In all other cases - where the conductors have been separated (after the service head) then the conditions in table 54.8 and 544.1.1 are applicable.
If it did just simply mean "except for PME" then that would be the wording.
Why write the clause as particular to PME conditions, if they didn't mean where it is part of the PME (TN-C ) aspect.
Taking "except where PME conditions apply" to mean you can't use that table or regulation when dealing with part of the PME system fits the words, and the fact that the bonding size isn't specified.
Taking "except where PME conditions apply" to mean that the bonding size in the regulation and table isn't applicable to an installation supplied by a PME system begs the questions 1) what cable size should be used as 54.8 is "except where PME conditions apply" so what size for PME; and 2) why the "odd" wording, why not just say 'except for installations supplied from PME"?
Except..
where the cross sectional area required not less than half…..
Except..
where highway furniture…..
Where PME conditions the MPBC in accordance with the PEN Table 54.8
Where an installation has more than…..MPBC Sselected to the largest PEN of the supply
Must say a 2 year old could write this better & most probably understand it better too.
Beauty… extension leads with a IP …SPD…Rcd…AFDD & free bogof bonding clampIt looks to me like nothing has changed apart from the wording.
How far away is the greenhouse ?
Explain to the customer how much easier it would be to use an extension lead
Probably some Chinese kit already on the shelf at AldiBeauty… extension leads with a IP …SPD…Rcd…AFDD & free bogof bonding clamp![]()
Great confusion eliminatedYes, my apologies, I had read that both aspects were except PME, but it in fact is the same as previously, 54.8 applies to PME, and the first part of 544.1.1 to non-PME; it is only that portion which has changed to allow smaller bonding size for additional buildings.
My fault entirely.
If I am wrong, I am wrong, no issues with that.Took a fair bit of deliberation on my part before I finally said I don't see it that way Julie, I then hid behind the sofa![]()
Does this require MPBC
It an extraneous & needs bonding with the appropriate sized conductorNo.
Why? MPBC assumes the extraneous part can.....
1) introduce a potential (yes)
2) introduce heat damaging currents. (No)
3) can be simultaneousely touched with other extr. metal (No)
Does it require supplementary bonding? Yes
Why? A class 1 appliance may be plugged in to the powerpoint
It an extraneous & needs bonding with the appropriate sized conductorNo.
Why? MPBC assumes the extraneous part can.....
1) introduce a potential (yes)
2) introduce heat damaging currents. (No)
3) can be simultaneousely touched with other extr. metal (No)
Does it require supplementary bonding? Yes
Why? A class 1 appliance may be plugged in to the powerpoint