R!+R2 Question | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss R!+R2 Question in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Done the above test many times jud and tried the tests with and without flying lead to back boxes with the flying lead connected you get a much lower reading now what is that telling me it's picking up other paths or have I been doing these tests all wrong

This is the resistance path with the cpc and conduit connected at the earth bar along with the line conductor

with.jpg


This is the resistance path with the line and cpc connected together in a connector block and independent of the earth bar

without.jpg
 
Jud not disagreeing with your diagrams but the db is earted the conduit is connected to the db therefore the flying lead from back box which is connected to the conduit is earted ie from db so if you don't disconnect the eart to the back boxes you are picking this paralel earth up honest
 
Yes but the resistance measured by the meter needs a loop from one test lead to the other.

Because the link between the cpc and conduit is broken at the DB, the conduit is no longer part of the loop.

Imagine what would happen if applied a current to the line conductor in the second picture. It can't travel through the conduit as it isn't part of the circuit. The current would travel down the line conductor, through the link and back down the cpc to the origin.
 
Hi Jud,

I would agree with you if not for the links to the back boxes, which is connected to the CPC at each accessory. if I have read the Op correct.

This effectively places a length of conduit in parallel with the CPC, between each flying lead that is still connected.

I hear what you are saying, RE: disconnecting from the Earth bar as this would normally remove the conduit from the test readings, but in this case the conduit is still connected at multiple points along the way, via each flying lead.
 

Attachments

  • without, but with multiple paths.jpg
    without, but with multiple paths.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 34
Last edited:
Whilst reading this debate, I was glad the R1+R2 question reached a satisfactory conclusion
icon14.png
icon10.png


Now I would like to make another point relevant to this thread,which that I was trying to resist making till then
icon7.png


As far as the little I know,the question of the R1+R2 on a completed conduit system should not need discussing:tounge_smile:

If that figure was required it should have been taken before any accessories were fixed and the fly leads installed,so there
icon6.png
 

Reply to R!+R2 Question in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
791
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
978

Similar threads

Often, but not always: 543.2.9 Except where the circuit protective conductor is formed by a metal covering or enclosure containing all of the...
2
Replies
23
Views
946

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top