I've just started at a new church and the electrics are bit of a shambles. I'm not going to be touching them as I'm not qualified, but one thing I have been told is this, which I'm not sure is correct (and really doesn't sound right).
Sometime in the 90's the building was rewired by SEEBoard, who used twin core cable, the earth system being provided by the conduit which uses slip couplings. This failed in fairly short order and left many circuits with no earth - there's a very lengthy associated story of trying to get it rectified and failing.
To repair this now would mean ripping everything out and starting again, which they're keen to avoid. Apparently a few years ago an electrician stated it is fine to keep using these circuits, complete with metal faced switches and sockets, along with sockets now having no earthing system, as he fitted RCBO's to the circuit as and I quote "these are suitable for circuits without an earth arrangement".
Is that right? I've only done the EAL Level 3 and don't call myself an electrician, but this doesn't sound right to me? I'm aware of Regulation 411.3.1.1 & BS7671 which is why I'm struggling to believe this is correct. However I'm very happy to be put right if that is the case. Thanks.
Sometime in the 90's the building was rewired by SEEBoard, who used twin core cable, the earth system being provided by the conduit which uses slip couplings. This failed in fairly short order and left many circuits with no earth - there's a very lengthy associated story of trying to get it rectified and failing.
To repair this now would mean ripping everything out and starting again, which they're keen to avoid. Apparently a few years ago an electrician stated it is fine to keep using these circuits, complete with metal faced switches and sockets, along with sockets now having no earthing system, as he fitted RCBO's to the circuit as and I quote "these are suitable for circuits without an earth arrangement".
Is that right? I've only done the EAL Level 3 and don't call myself an electrician, but this doesn't sound right to me? I'm aware of Regulation 411.3.1.1 & BS7671 which is why I'm struggling to believe this is correct. However I'm very happy to be put right if that is the case. Thanks.