RCBOs vs RCDs Pt2 | Page 3 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss RCBOs vs RCDs Pt2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Take one bit of 2 core flex, connect both cores at one end to a neutral, then connect the other ends of the two cores together.
What current will flow?
Where will it flow to.
That is essentially what you have with the N & E linked on the distribution side, and your N-E fault in the installation.
 
The neutral current will divert through the fault to earth in accordance with the laws of resistances in parallel.

I would agree with this.

However, how many circuits are there in existence that are not RCD protected but have had neutral to earth faults for years with no apparent effects?

A single pole RCBO would hopefully provide protection to somebody receiving an electric shock, so I think their use is beneficial, but not as good as a device that disconnects all live conductors.
 
Take one bit of 2 core flex, connect both cores at one end to a neutral, then connect the other ends of the two cores together.
What current will flow?
Where will it flow to.
That is essentially what you have with the N & E linked on the distribution side, and your N-E fault in the installation.

No it isn't, the whole of the installation is connected into it too.

In your example you would have to connect the neutral side of a load to one of the cores halfway along its length to simulate this. The neutral current from the load will flow to neutral directly down the shorter path and through the longer path going to the far end of the flex and back to neutral.

The ratio will be determined by resistance of each path
 
I would agree with this.

However, how many circuits are there in existence that are not RCD protected but have had neutral to earth faults for years with no apparent effects?

A single pole RCBO would hopefully provide protection to somebody receiving an electric shock, so I think their use is beneficial, but not as good as a device that disconnects all live conductors.

And how many have had disastrous effects? How many times have fires started from N-E faults?

You have only seen the ones which haven't caused a problem because the ones which have caused a problem have been fixed or burned out already.

Obviously you rarely see the ill effects of them in domestics because there is naff all neutral current to start with !
 
And how many have had disastrous effects? How many times have fires started from N-E faults?

I doubt anybody really knows.

Obviously you rarely see the ill effects of them in domestics because there is naff all neutral current to start with !

I've never seen it in commercial either, but perhaps I've been lucky.
 
No it isn't, the whole of the installation is connected into it too.

In your example you would have to connect the neutral side of a load to one of the cores halfway along its length to simulate this. The neutral current from the load will flow to neutral directly down the shorter path and through the longer path going to the far end of the flex and back to neutral.

The ratio will be determined by resistance of each path
What does this diverted neutral current do when it meets the diverted neutral current coming from the N & E link up the CPC to the N-E fault?
 
What does this diverted neutral current do when it meets the diverted neutral current coming from the N & E link up the CPC to the N-E fault?

Wtf?

Current doesn't flow from the cutout up the cpc to the fault!
It flows via the fault then through the cpc back to the cutout
 
Why doesn't it?
If there was no fault it would, so why doesn't now that there is a fault?

Current flowing through the cpc from the cutout in normal operation ???
Where did you get that one from?

The only thing flowing in a cpc under normal conditions will be leakage current from smps's and similar.
 
You’ve changed your tune.

The trouble is the SP RCBO just don’t match what it says on the tin. For this reason I think many have accepted them as an instant cure all in every situation. This can only be attributed to lack of knowledge on the part of the electrician. (The ones that bite my head off now will be the ones in the know.)

Some manufacturers do point out the short comings of the SP RCBO in handling a N→E fault. To my mind it should be made clear to everyone. As we’ve often discussed it seems to be the doctrine of colleges to preach fitting RCD’s to everything.

How have i changed my tune??
 

Reply to RCBOs vs RCDs Pt2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Hi everyone, If you are looking for reliable EV chargers, check out our top-rated selection at E2GO! ⚡ Please note that all EV Chargers and...
Replies
0
Views
228
  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
Leaves the potential nuisance of knocking off a raft of equipment unnecessarily
Replies
7
Views
1K
Interesting. Did you ever resolve this?
Replies
10
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top