RCD RATING VS. SERVICE FUSE RATING

spud1

-
Arms
Hi chaps

A Wholesaler told me me this week that the RCDs in the new '18th' split load boards have to be rated at 100a because the 100a service fuse is only means of upstream overcurrent protection. But I was once told that service fuses, although marked as 100A on the cutout label are actually only actually 80amp?

Any thoughts guys?
 
Just had a wholesaler email. Hager have responded to their interpretation of this by releasing dual RCD boards with 100A RCCBs.
As the regulation requires that manufacturers instructions are to be taken into account regarding overload it stands to reason that at least with Hager , they are requiring overload protection of their rccb’s in their consumer units
 
101F2C32-9017-453E-A72E-C05A9262DF71.png
 
Please note:
Taking account of Manufacture’s instructions is not the same as following, complying with or adhering to, Manufacturer’s instructions.
 
Hager now are supplying their dual rcd boards with 2 x 100amp 30mA rccb’s which are now type A with or with out an SPD
Yep, and the prices have gone up by a staggering 64% (example used is old VML710CU to new VML910CU). I don't fit many of these (mostly all-RCBO boards) but now the price differential between a high integrity, and an all-RCBO board makes it less worth while now.

I'm impressed at the minimal price difference between boards with and without SPDs, though; e.g. difference between VML114 (14 way, main 100A main switch) and VML112SPD (12 way, 100A main switch with Type 2 SPD) is a fairly reasonable £74.95+VAT (and you also save the cost of 2 blanks ;) ).
 
What problem(s) is(are) this(these) new regulation(s) addressing?

My guess is the frequency with which boards are being installed with an under rated RCD protecting a group of circuits.

I've just been to quote a job today and it was an Ashley and Rock board with an 80A RCD protecting I would say somewhere in the region of 180A worth of MCBs.

Even allowing for some diversity as per the OSG, the five 32A MCBs come out at over 80A. Whether this calculation provides a good reflection of the true load is irrelevant, it doesn't seem right that there is the potential there for pumping 100A through an 80A rated switching device.
 
My guess is etc ....

You maybe right, but BYB 120.1 & 131.1 state blah blah blah.
Can anyone cite me an example of, in the last 10 or 15 years or so, where non-application of these new regs have caused a problem?

Being cynical, what with AFDDs etc, there seems to be a lot of finding and enforcing solutions to (virtually) non existent problems occurring here.
 
You maybe right, but BYB 120.1 & 131.1 state blah blah blah.
Can anyone cite me an example of, in the last 10 or 15 years or so, where non-application of these new regs have caused a problem?

Being cynical, what with AFDDs etc, there seems to be a lot of finding and enforcing solutions to (virtually) non existent problems occurring here.

I agree and may be a good reason why manufacturers should play no part in the writing of the regulations.
 
Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
spud1,
Last reply from
spark 68,
Replies
50
Views
17,502

Advert

Back
Top