This old chestnut
Client decided they couldn't wait a few weeks for me to do an EICR so got someone 'off the internet' who immediately failed it (probably fairly, since its a house, with fuse wire protection on all circuits it appears).
Looking at the report for a second opinion and under operational limitations is:
"only live testing done due to fish tank not being allowed to being turned off" (sic)
and they carried out Zs only on all circuits (no idea if the fish tank also has lighting, boiler and cooker connections!)
Also didn't take rfc resistances for 2 different socket circuits, when I assume the fish tank is only connected to one....
Obviously this happens on commercial EICRs quite often where machines have to be left on, but is this a reasonable limitation on domestic cases? I'd say it's at least not in the spirit of the idea of EICRs as they are meant to be used for the domestic rental sector.
The report is probably reasonable otherwise, with a couple of arguable C2s but some clear ones too..
ÂŁ710 quote for new CU and bathroom lights is not the worst rip off I've seen either - if a bit overkill since they've also done the report. (though depends if that is RCBO all circuits or Screwfix special)
I wouldn't consider a 'live testing only' certificate to be a reasonable test of a domestic electrical installation, but maybe others do?
Client decided they couldn't wait a few weeks for me to do an EICR so got someone 'off the internet' who immediately failed it (probably fairly, since its a house, with fuse wire protection on all circuits it appears).
Looking at the report for a second opinion and under operational limitations is:
"only live testing done due to fish tank not being allowed to being turned off" (sic)
and they carried out Zs only on all circuits (no idea if the fish tank also has lighting, boiler and cooker connections!)
Also didn't take rfc resistances for 2 different socket circuits, when I assume the fish tank is only connected to one....
Obviously this happens on commercial EICRs quite often where machines have to be left on, but is this a reasonable limitation on domestic cases? I'd say it's at least not in the spirit of the idea of EICRs as they are meant to be used for the domestic rental sector.
The report is probably reasonable otherwise, with a couple of arguable C2s but some clear ones too..
ÂŁ710 quote for new CU and bathroom lights is not the worst rip off I've seen either - if a bit overkill since they've also done the report. (though depends if that is RCBO all circuits or Screwfix special)
I wouldn't consider a 'live testing only' certificate to be a reasonable test of a domestic electrical installation, but maybe others do?