Should Scotland be allowed another referendum and do you think parliament has a right to deny it?

[Baddegg]

Cash cow ?

 

[baldelectrician]

Again you put words into our mouths to suit your purpose. Where have there been loads of replies saying that 'you jocks should know your place'?

The general opinion seems to favour the continued union of England and Scotland. And I certainly don't have anything against Scotland.

But you keep twisting things to suit your own agenda if you want. You seem to enjoy it.

I am not putting words in to your mouths.

I am saying Scotland should have the right to choose, others are saying NO
It might be put in language of " the consensus is ...' but it is the same thing in the end.
Scots are denied to choose their own future at the time if their choice.

Either Scotland ( through their elected parliament) have the right to choose or not.

Democracy denied is not democracy.

 

[DPG]

I am not putting words in to your mouths.

I am saying Scotland should have the right to choose, others are saying NO
It might be put in language of " the consensus is ...' but it is the same thing in the end.
Scots are denied to choose their own future at the time if their choice.

Either Scotland ( through their elected parliament) have the right to choose or not.

Democracy denied is not democracy.

Read your second line in post #104

 

[baldelectrician]

Read your second line in post #104

?
Scotland should have the right to choose?
I agree.

The problem is when things like 'now is not the time' and ' you had a vote'

 

[DPG]

?
Scotland should have the right to choose?
I agree.

The problem is when things like 'now is not the time' and ' you had a vote'

Unbelievable. Completely ignoring the line I referred to and just decided to put whatever you wanted to instead.

You don't even realise you're doing it.

 

[Baddegg]

Are we reading different threads??.....who’s ever said on here the jocks should now they place???.......you are starting to concern me mate extremism comes in many forms ?

 

[baldelectrician]

I am reading it on my phone and I quoted the second line.
I will respond to the next 2 lines
It might be put in language of " the consensus is ...' but it is the same thing in the end.
I mean the consensus from elsewhere- the Scottish Parliament has voted for a referendum so isn't the consensus in Scotland

Scots are denied to choose their own future at the time if their choice.
This is true, the Scottish Parliament is being refused the power / permission to do so.
[automerge]1592482715[/automerge]

Are we reading different threads??.....who’s ever said on here the jocks should now they place???.......you are starting to concern me mate extremism comes in many forms ?

It isn't literally being said but is essentially the just of the argument from those who feel they should ( not the Scottish Parliament) decide / deny a referendum.
Scotland is either in an equal partnership and can leave when it chooses or it is not and Scots need to know their place.

 

[DPG]

Your second line starts with 'There have been many more.....'.

But no, you choose another 2 lines to respond to.

You baffle me.

 

[baldelectrician]

I will explain again
I AM READING ON A MOBILE the lines do not match up...
The 4th line start with "There have been..."

Your second line starts with 'There have been many more.....'.

But no, you choose another 2 lines to respond to.

You baffle me.

 

[DPG]

Second line as in the second sentence. Obviously different size screens will word-wrap differently.

 

[Baddegg]

I am reading it on my phone and I quoted the second line.
I will respond to the next 2 lines
It might be put in language of " the consensus is ...' but it is the same thing in the end.
I mean the consensus from elsewhere- the Scottish Parliament has voted for a referendum so isn't the consensus in Scotland

Scots are denied to choose their own future at the time if their choice.
This is true, the Scottish Parliament is being refused the power / permission to do so.
[automerge]1592482715[/automerge]

It isn't literally being said but is essentially the just of the argument from those who feel they should ( not the Scottish Parliament) decide / deny a referendum.
Scotland is either in an equal partnership and can leave when it chooses or it is not and Scots need to know their place.

I can assure you it’s not the just of my argument or anyone I know ?

 

[the pict]

The attitude of some MP,s is staggeringly anti Scots and not for any reason they can actually verbalise instead they hurl insults albeit when no one other than the intended recipitant can hear but of course if their like minded cronies can hear well so much the better more kudos all round and something to snigger about later , don't believe me check out Mhairi Blacks youtube interview , and this is all because the regard Scotland as a defeated nation and occupied territory, a fatal flaw in what has become the deluded upper class self entitled snob culture who live in the 50,s

 

[Baddegg]

The rich will view anyone who isn’t as beneath them , and as nothing more than an asset....good job the rest of real people don’t feel like em ?

 

[DPG]

The rich will view anyone who isn’t as beneath them , and as nothing more than an asset....good job the rest of real people don’t feel like em ?

Not necessarily. It's all relative - I have more money than some people, but less than others. What is 'rich' to one person will not be to another. And there is a lot of inverted snobbery goes on, when people seem to almost take pleasure in complaining about 'rich people'.

 

[Baddegg]

Completely agree mate, was was being a bit broad but was referring more to the landed elite and such.....if we using a different measurement I’m the richest man alive...I’ve got 4 great kids who make me laugh everyday ?