I've been asked to do a couple of jobs at a potential customer. Will be taking a look tomorrow.
One job is signing off others work for an extension. (Her builder has bu.. off). I know about the imminent changes to allow this (for work done to part P in the first place). Have been watching the NICEIC/ELECSA circulars saying this is imminent, but no detail and no forms of inspection available yet.
Without seeing it yet, no idea whether the Builder was Part P, got it spot on, or was totally incompetent.
I am considering treating it as a full Periodic, ie quoting her for Periodic Inspection via Condition Report Inspection Schedule & EICR first, and if that works out OK, I could (for minimal additional charge), provide her EIC for Building Control, with the latter signed ONLY under "For Inspection and Testing", with "Comments" section explaining why the installation is unsigned and referencing the previous CRIS/EICR.
If obvious work was necessary after CRIS/EICR, then that would be quoted separately before she got her (half-signed) EIC.
Kind of belt and braces, but since it's been left that way, I don't see an obvious alternative which keeps me covered.
Is this a sensible way forward?
One job is signing off others work for an extension. (Her builder has bu.. off). I know about the imminent changes to allow this (for work done to part P in the first place). Have been watching the NICEIC/ELECSA circulars saying this is imminent, but no detail and no forms of inspection available yet.
Without seeing it yet, no idea whether the Builder was Part P, got it spot on, or was totally incompetent.
I am considering treating it as a full Periodic, ie quoting her for Periodic Inspection via Condition Report Inspection Schedule & EICR first, and if that works out OK, I could (for minimal additional charge), provide her EIC for Building Control, with the latter signed ONLY under "For Inspection and Testing", with "Comments" section explaining why the installation is unsigned and referencing the previous CRIS/EICR.
If obvious work was necessary after CRIS/EICR, then that would be quoted separately before she got her (half-signed) EIC.
Kind of belt and braces, but since it's been left that way, I don't see an obvious alternative which keeps me covered.
Is this a sensible way forward?