Sorry not strictly true. The array does not have to go into its own board. The inverter (If grid connected) can go back to any spare way on a consumer unit and be marked up accordingly. As for back feeding the MCB is protecting the inverter not offering protection INTO the existing system and so acts just the same as any protection device on any circuit. The protection INTO the property is offered by the Inverter and if grid power is lost the inverter automatically shuts down the PV system.[/QUOTe
Youre right Mark,thanks for putting me right,what i meant to say,was that i would put it on a separate board ,to avoid any grief later in the event of a fault,as then you can eliminate that particular circuit/install from the equation..
Think ive read the original question wrong....if hes got two fuseways in the board and uses the spare to protect the inverter,is he assuming that the shower will be fed off this also??
Be Lucky
I have considered that option myself, Putting in a separate board just for the PV system. I can see merits to it and there is no regulation to prevent it. We seem to of been on a run of installs were a spare way was available and for neatness we have utilised it. One of my concerns using this option is one of future works that may or may not be conducted within the property. Having a separate board along side the main one may be missed for isolation when alterations are conducted on the existing electrical system. I agree it will be labelled and warning notices warning of more than one source but it would be reliant on the electrician to act on it. Agree also same to some degree when in the main board if a spare way was utilised. Still not sure but not an issue anyway.
I think he is assuming anything generated would go into the shower as that is the only thing connected to that board. Its a understandable assumption from my experience as many see PV as white man's magic. Even those who fit it!!!!!!!!!
Regards
Mark