So what the guidance is saying Johnboy, do a risk assessment of clients electronic equipment (cost)and ask them isit worth it or not.
They should sign it too.
Having seen a hospital take a substantial lightning strike with a repair bill of circa £500,000 and about 4 - 5 days disruption there was a full risk assessment done on the future risk of it happening again the results of which concluded that the cost (around £600,000) of installing the necessary protection across the site versus the strike risk was not a viable spend having had no documented strikes in the previous 40 - 50 years and a calculated future strike risk of 1 sometime in the next 44 to 400 years
Got caught out on my NIC assessment in 2019 for not fitting them on a commercial job.
No, just stearnly told us to do risk assessments in future on an individual basis (ie, for the cost and hassle of doing the assessment and getting approval from the client NOT to fit it its just easier to go ahead and fit surge and charge a bit more for the job)
Sounds like the NIC trying to make a point and help the manufacturers sell more, I'm surprised the NIC are not insisting on professional indemnity for contractors in case they fit the wrong type of SPD
What happens if their electronic equipment still goes bang in a lighting storm
Anyone for efficacy insurance if the SPD fails to operate under surge / strike conditions
Don't know about cable TV, but traditional phone lines always had SPD at the master socket and there are standards for the sort of spikes that telecoms stuff should handle.
Though I suspect that has gone from newer systems. Probably BT, etc, treat the modems as disposable - they often don't update the crap software anyway!
I've seen a lot of surge arrestors fitted on intruder alarm comms kit where the installer didn't bother to connect them to a suitable earth so it made them a bit useless
Ideally they would have had it done when the building LPS was updated at some point between our original installation and when we had to fix it. We saw the change in conductors, etc, but no thought about a point going above the antenna! There you go
Our make-shift one is not ideal, as it would provide weak protection from some directions as not high enough and no time / spare cash to put in a couple of them. But it was the first direct hit in over 20 years so not
that common.
I've worked on a number of sites with rooftop comms kit and while installing comms kit I got into the habit of doing a quick test on the LPS down lead after we had some interference problems on one site where all the comms cables going to a number of buildings were earthing the LPS at the indoor units because the LPS down lead connection to the earth rod was broken and this was on an LPS that had been tested and certified some 10 months earlier the customer was adamant that it was ok and waved the certificate at me so I got a spade out and exposed the corroded LPS earth connections and then had to more or less drag him out of his office across the site to show him the problem that we had found
I just looked at John Ward's Youtube vids on SPDs - has series of about five vids on SPDs, emphasising how essential it is. He goes into the zones aspect. Worth looking at.
Based on what risk assessment and likely hood of it actually happening
When you look at the cost of an SPD I suppose it could be classed as an insurance policy that could sit there for many years and may never ever be needed so how do you justify the cost to the customer. As installations are altered and modified should the risk assessment be revisited to confirm that the type of SPD's installed are suitable for what may be a changed risk within the installation or whether the changes mean an SPD should be installed, which is something that no doubt will be addressed in future guidance
The combined industry experience of this forum probably runs to many hundreds if not thousands of years so the question is how many jobs have members been to where SPD's may have or would have prevented equipment damage and then would the cost of installing SPD's v's the replacement / repair cost of the equipment and disruption caused made it a cost effective decision to install SPD's
Personally in all the years I have worked in the industry I have only seen less than a handful of incidents that may have benefited from an SPD being installed so why is the push now to suggest that sites are at a much greater risk