Supplying outbuilding, bonding and earthing | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Supplying outbuilding, bonding and earthing in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

kropaske

-
Arms
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Messages
268
Reaction score
216
Location
Feltham
Hi Guys,

Just join this great forum so lets get straight to the point...

Soon we will be working on property (TNS) with 1 outbuilding on the back of the garden which have kitchen, bathroom and 1 extra room. Also there is gas central heating with combi boiler. At the moment they feed this outbuilding from kitchen ring on a 30amp fuse. They spur off to the outside socket with 2.5mm then 6mm swa from that socket to the CU in the outbuilding(cable not even burried). CU have 2x20amp and 1x6amp circuits as per image (bit of a mess). House CU is approx 20mtrs away from outbuilding CU.
We going to rewire kitchen and outside bit and also have to reconnect outbuilding back all this will go into 3 or 4 way CU for now. So the questions are:

1. 6mm swa gland at house CU from 32 amp mcb without rcd to the outside plastic waterproof junction box to reconnect to existing 6mm swa. Will that be ok?
2. Would you gland both swa cables at the outside junction box and reconnect armour with banjo or is there better solution?
3. At the moment armour is used as the earth, should i connect 3rd wire back to earth as well?
4. There is no bonding provided in the outbuilding, mains water is in plastic externally but all inside is copper. Wouldit be acceptable to bond gas and water back to outbuilding CU? I read it somewhere that it may be different scenario with PME supply, but TNS should be fine.
5. And finally do i need to retest whole outbuilding or just the sub main cable?

Lucas

[ElectriciansForums.net] Supplying outbuilding, bonding and earthing


[ElectriciansForums.net] Supplying outbuilding, bonding and earthing
 
Each SWA should be glanded at each end of the cable, not bridged the way it is at the moment in the CU you have shown.
The CU you have shown should be put back to being in accordance with the manufacturers spec instead of the current bodge up.

1- personally I don't like SWA terminated into a plastic box, I would prefer to fit a proper SWA joint.
2-earthing nuts are a better solution than banjos these days, or even just use a decent metal enclosure.
3-Yes any spare core of cable which contains live conductors should be shorted to earth at one end to prevent ghost voltages appearing.
4- is it extraneous? Test it rather than guessing. Whatever the earthing system a main bond must be at least equal to the minimum size required from the MET through to its final point of connection to the extraneous part. So no you cannot just assume that due to it being TNS you don't need a separate bonding conductor, establish the minimum size of main bond and then calculate whether the armour has a suitable copper equivalent CSA.
5- looking at the state of that board I'd want to do a proper inspection of the installation before starting,
 

Depends whats in the kitchen, bathroom and extra room. Wall heaters, electric shower, oven?


1. 6mm swa gland at house CU from 32 amp mcb without rcd to the outside plastic waterproof junction box to reconnect to existing 6mm swa. Will that be ok? See 2

2. Would you gland both swa cables at the outside junction box and reconnect armour with banjo or is there better solution?
Personally Id rather have one cable without joints but if needs must and it needs jointing then the armour must be earthed on both SWA's. If outside i would definitely use piranha earth nuts and a suitable fly lead.

3. At the moment armour is used as the earth, should i connect 3rd wire back to earth as well?
Is the existing cable 3-core? if not then there's not much point installing part of the run in 3-core apart from an extra parallel path.

4. There is no bonding provided in the outbuilding, mains water is in plastic externally but all inside is copper. Wouldit be acceptable to bond gas and water back to outbuilding CU? I read it somewhere that it may be different scenario with PME supply, but TNS should be fine. If mains water and gas is plastic and there are no extraneous conductive parts in outbuilding then nothing needs bonding.

5. And finally do i need to retest whole outbuilding or just the sub main cable?
I'd retest the lot
 
As Dave states that CU has been lashed up, incorrect protective devices which are not linked by way of a suitable busbar and the rcd shouldn't be there. Replace it after giving it a proper test. The armour of the cable is definitely inadequate for bonding purposes and so is the separate core.
 
Hi - reading this, just on the bonding - it may be an outbuilding, but it sounds like a house, so I'd like to run a properly sized conductor all the way back. Tin hat on I just don't like a building with water, gas, boiler, CH, kitchen and bathroom and no possibility of bonding. Or perhaps convert outbuilding to TT?
 
Thanks for all the input Guys, really appreciate.
I know this installation is far from perfect, and most of it should be redone. But you know what the clients are like.
I want to make sure is safe so plan of action will be:

1. Recommend to replace whole swa first. If not then swa to external plastic properly terminated - not perfect but safe and acceptable. New and existig swa would be 3 core.
2. Feed swa from 32 non rcd.
3. Test existing wiring in the outbuilding replace CU with metal RCD protected.
There is hardly any load on there anyway - only few sockets, 3 lights and boiler. No heaters, oven or shower.
4. Check resistance between met and pipework in outbuilding and find out if the pipe are extraneous-conductive-part. If not no bonding required if yes, bond it.
Option for bonding - if adiabatics confirm that 6mm conductor is enough, am i allow use 3rd core of swa, or this would not be acceptable?
Alernatively i can run separate conductor (externally) from the met from the house to the outbuilding.
5. Test all.

Is that sounds good?
 
Thanks for all the input Guys, really appreciate.
I know this installation is far from perfect, and most of it should be redone. But you know what the clients are like.
I want to make sure is safe so plan of action will be:

1. Recommend to replace whole swa first. If not then swa to external plastic properly terminated - not perfect but safe and acceptable. New and existig swa would be 3 core.
2. Feed swa from 32 non rcd.
3. Test existing wiring in the outbuilding replace CU with metal RCD protected.
There is hardly any load on there anyway - only few sockets, 3 lights and boiler. No heaters, oven or shower.
4. Check resistance between met and pipework in outbuilding and find out if the pipe are extraneous-conductive-part. If not no bonding required if yes, bond it.
Option for bonding - if adiabatics confirm that 6mm conductor is enough, am i allow use 3rd core of swa, or this would not be acceptable?
Alernatively i can run separate conductor (externally) from the met from the house to the outbuilding.
5. Test all.

Is that sounds good?

1 - Is there something wrong with the existing cable? Why are you giving them only the options of the apparently over the top total replacement or the utter Bodgeit plastic box? Why not joint the SWA with a proper SWA joint?

4 - this is a seriously scary question to be coming from someone who claims to be competent and niceic registered, I think it just goes to prove how far the niceic standards have dropped these days. The adiabatic equation is not used to calculate the size of main bonding and as to whether or not you can use a copper conductor as a main bond, well I'm not going to answer that if you can't work it out!
 
1 - Is there something wrong with the existing cable? Why are you giving them only the options of the apparently over the top total replacement or the utter Bodgeit plastic box? Why not joint the SWA with a proper SWA joint?

4 - this is a seriously scary question to be coming from someone who claims to be competent and niceic registered, I think it just goes to prove how far the niceic standards have dropped these days. The adiabatic equation is not used to calculate the size of main bonding and as to whether or not you can use a copper conductor as a main bond, well I'm not going to answer that if you can't work it out!

I may just word this slightly incorrect. What i meant is use adiabatics to determin csa of earth then bonding needs to be at leaset half of required earth conductor but not less than 6mm for tn system. So assuming required earth is less than 12mm then 6mm bonding is fine.And of course you can use copper conductor as bonding but i am just not sure if is acceptable to use one core from swa.
 
I may just word this slightly incorrect. What i meant is use adiabatics to determin csa of earth then bonding needs to be at leaset half of required earth conductor but not less than 6mm for tn system. So assuming required earth is less than 12mm then 6mm bonding is fine.And of course you can use copper conductor as bonding but i am just not sure if is acceptable to use one core from swa.

Main bond needs to be not less than half the size of the earthing conductor if I remember correctly, not half the size of the minimum permissible earthing conductor by calculation.
 
Main bond needs to be not less than half the size of the earthing conductor if I remember correctly, not half the size of the minimum permissible earthing conductor by calculation.
No need to up the size of main bonding just because you happen to use a size of earthing conductor above the minimum required. 544.1.1 refers.
 

Reply to Supplying outbuilding, bonding and earthing in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
564
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
998
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
938

Similar threads

He said something about a fused something as the lights hardly take anything .. I told him was mostly cordless tools so just chargers ..told him...
Replies
11
Views
767
Yeah, been unwell but better late than never!
2
Replies
24
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top