SWA or else? | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss SWA or else? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
As a result of intended "change of use", I have had a new supply/meter installed in an existing barn conversion.

There is pre-existing (certified) wiring and an existing CU on the opposite side of the barn to the new meter installation.

The logical route between existing CU & new meter is a 7m exposed surface mount run on a roof truss (there is also plenty of Western Power's ducting off-cuts left on site if relevant).

I am in the process of finishing the spec/drawings for tenders for all the associated works and would welcome advice on whether such a incoming connection is effectively mandated as a single run of 2-core 16mm² SWA only (earth on SWA allowed?)that I can leave un-specified or if there are any alternative solutions worth asking for costings, such as using twin long runs of "Tails" for power with parallel 16mm² earth?

I am principally interested in having facts prior to builders quoting their inhouse-spark back to me second-hand.
 
price in materials for a SWA vs "tails" wont be much different, SWA will need around 2 hours more labour to properly terminate, and if properly terminated can carry the earth on the armour.,
 
The answer on the SWA will depend on where the main peptide bonding is terminated. The armour will be sufficient to use as a cpc but not as a main bond.
 
Thanks for all the in-puts & it looks like I can initially leave the spec open & then can query any differences that are evident on prices if they don't elaborate.

One immediate feed-back I got from a visiting sparks today was that it will need 3-core 25mm² SWA rather than 2-core 16mm² SWA as he said that the SWA is effectively the meter tails (which now all need to be 25mm²?), rather than just the 16mm² needed by the on-line calculator's nominal max 23kW load of the 100A DNO fuse.

I'm currently working on the assumption that the earthing set-up on the current cu can be used/re-certified as the main bond as it was also recently re-certified when a domestic solar PV array went live, so can't see his point for 3-core SWA.
 
Thanks for all the in-puts & it looks like I can initially leave the spec open & then can query any differences that are evident on prices if they don't elaborate.

One immediate feed-back I got from a visiting sparks today was that it will need 3-core 25mm² SWA rather than 2-core 16mm² SWA as he said that the SWA is effectively the meter tails (which now all need to be 25mm²?), rather than just the 16mm² needed by the on-line calculator's nominal max 23kW load of the 100A DNO fuse.

I'm currently working on the assumption that the earthing set-up on the current cu can be used/re-certified as the main bond as it was also recently re-certified when a domestic solar PV array went live, so can't see his point for 3-core SWA.

The SWA will not be your meter tails, the meter tails will be feeding the switchfuse which supplies this SWA.

The SWA will need to be 3 core or have a seperate bond run back to the MET
 
Dave

Thanks for the clarification.

25mm² meter tails to 100A DP switch, then 3-core required (either 3-core SWA or 2-core & separate 16mm² earth as any 3-core SWA is labour sensitive to cost) but 16mm² SWA is OK as per on-line Voltage Drop Calcs for 100A/23kW?

Obviously I can await an entertaining morning when the builders/sparks come to look prior to tendering.....
 
Dave

Thanks for the clarification.

25mm² meter tails to 100A DP switch, then 3-core required (either 3-core SWA or 2-core & separate 16mm² earth as any 3-core SWA is labour sensitive to cost) but 16mm² SWA is OK as per on-line Voltage Drop Calcs for 100A/23kW?

Obviously I can await an entertaining morning when the builders/sparks come to look prior to tendering.....

It needs an OCPD as well, not just a switch at the origin. A switchfuse is the most sensible option.

You might want to review your cable calculations for a 100A supply.
 
It needs an OCPD as well, not just a switch at the origin. A switchfuse is the most sensible option.

You might want to review your cable calculations for a 100A supply.
unless he fits a 80A SW/F.
 
Again, thanks for all the input.

What I failed to mention at the outset was that, as there's been trenching and ducting involved for the new supply, a shed supply was also laid with 3-core 10mm². With a new sub-main for the shed plus the pre-exiting CU both to be connected, the 100A DP switch was only intended to get the meter installation completed without EDF throwing a wobbly.

The first thing after the DP switch will be a "standard" domestic 2-way CU (to take 25mm² in-coming tails & a second with 100A double pole switch & the relevant trips for "old" main & new sub-main circuits) and then split it out to old CU and new shed 10mm² SWA.

I leave the detailed design to you guys as the 'competent person' , but sadly, experience has left me with enough curiosity to make sure I know what to expect. Some times it's what I forgot to say (eg here - the shed supply) but sometimes it can be ".... priced to get the job...." without thought for future-proofing. Either way, I don't like surprises, so little tools (like TLC's cable calculator) are useful as a pointer to where the "challenges" may lie. I can foresee handling problems with 3-core 25mm² SWA as it's the best part of 1" diameter, and a sparks is expensive to pay as a labourer, so if the TLC calc suggests 2-core 16mm² with a separate earth may work or as ("amlu" suggests) 25mm² across a rafter may work, it gives me something to discuss with the 'competent person' when it comes to pricing.

Life's little challenges make it interesting and your comments give me something to ask "intelligent" questions about.
 
Again, thanks for all the input.

What I failed to mention at the outset was that, as there's been trenching and ducting involved for the new supply, a shed supply was also laid with 3-core 10mm². With a new sub-main for the shed plus the pre-exiting CU both to be connected, the 100A DP switch was only intended to get the meter installation completed without EDF throwing a wobbly.

The first thing after the DP switch will be a "standard" domestic 2-way CU (to take 25mm² in-coming tails & a second with 100A double pole switch & the relevant trips for "old" main & new sub-main circuits) and then split it out to old CU and new shed 10mm² SWA.

I leave the detailed design to you guys as the 'competent person' , but sadly, experience has left me with enough curiosity to make sure I know what to expect. Some times it's what I forgot to say (eg here - the shed supply) but sometimes it can be ".... priced to get the job...." without thought for future-proofing. Either way, I don't like surprises, so little tools (like TLC's cable calculator) are useful as a pointer to where the "challenges" may lie. I can foresee handling problems with 3-core 25mm² SWA as it's the best part of 1" diameter, and a sparks is expensive to pay as a labourer, so if the TLC calc suggests 2-core 16mm² with a separate earth may work or as ("amlu" suggests) 25mm² across a rafter may work, it gives me something to discuss with the 'competent person' when it comes to pricing.

Life's little challenges make it interesting and your comments give me something to ask "intelligent" questions about.

so the distribution circuits to each sub board are going to be protected by MCB's by the look of your post?
 
I started this post really only looking for a guide as to whether or not SWA would now be mandated for the surface mounted connection of a new supply across (an unheated space) to an existing CU some 8-10m away as the new connection will still need a "main switch" and "main board" to fit into the DNO's meter cabinet. Getting it into the meter cabinet is to avoid any possible "wobblies" from the meter installer and to allow the work to be split into before/after meter installation.

I had intended to use words in the spec such as:

"...Within the meter box ... provide the tails, main switch and main distribution board ... for the installation of a domestic meter by the supplier ... suitable for the connection of new sub-mains to the existing domestic Consumer Unit and to the new 3-core 10mm² SWA external supply...."

With the advent of 17th edition, I had rather assumed that the "...3m tails..." rule(?) indicated that I would be expecting designs to come back with 3-core 25mm² SWA and labour costs to match for handling a thick & unwieldy cable to go through a couple of 'S' bends so as to terminate in the meter box (which amlu etc seem to confirm).

The "old" cu shares the DNO's TN-C-S earth with a solar PV installation that will be unaffected, so, subject to re-testing, presumably negates the need for the SWA sheath as an earth. Even assuming the need for a separate earth, would not a separate 16mm earth run with 2-core 25mm² SWA be easier/less labour to handle?

As I see it, this leaves SWA only for physical protection on a surface mounted run. Davesparks comment made me think about what sort of design I might see submitted (and if my "ask" was feasible) for the small two way main board within the meter cabinet, which all seem to come with a DP-switch and couple of "free" mcbs - presumably these can be swapped out for down-rating RCBOs as sub-main cut-outs to meet the "...discrimination issues..." for the old CU and new shed sub-boards. Hopefully that could down-rate the 10m long run to 80A & hence viable in 16mm² SWA or old fashioned Double Insulated surface cable?
 
I started this post really only looking for a guide as to whether or not SWA would now be mandated for the surface mounted connection of a new supply across (an unheated space) to an existing CU some 8-10m away as the new connection will still need a "main switch" and "main board" to fit into the DNO's meter cabinet. Getting it into the meter cabinet is to avoid any possible "wobblies" from the meter installer and to allow the work to be split into before/after meter installation.

I had intended to use words in the spec such as:

"...Within the meter box ... provide the tails, main switch and main distribution board ... for the installation of a domestic meter by the supplier ... suitable for the connection of new sub-mains to the existing domestic Consumer Unit and to the new 3-core 10mm² SWA external supply...."

With the advent of 17th edition, I had rather assumed that the "...3m tails..." rule(?) indicated that I would be expecting designs to come back with 3-core 25mm² SWA and labour costs to match for handling a thick & unwieldy cable to go through a couple of 'S' bends so as to terminate in the meter box (which amlu etc seem to confirm).

The "old" cu shares the DNO's TN-C-S earth with a solar PV installation that will be unaffected, so, subject to re-testing, presumably negates the need for the SWA sheath as an earth. Even assuming the need for a separate earth, would not a separate 16mm earth run with 2-core 25mm² SWA be easier/less labour to handle?

As I see it, this leaves SWA only for physical protection on a surface mounted run. Davesparks comment made me think about what sort of design I might see submitted (and if my "ask" was feasible) for the small two way main board within the meter cabinet, which all seem to come with a DP-switch and couple of "free" mcbs - presumably these can be swapped out for down-rating RCBOs as sub-main cut-outs to meet the "...discrimination issues..." for the old CU and new shed sub-boards. Hopefully that could down-rate the 10m long run to 80A & hence viable in 16mm² SWA or old fashioned Double Insulated surface cable?
if you call a local electrician for a quote most would be quite happy to do the work if you installed the cable for them under there instructions.

25mm swa isnt a size that can be easily installed on your own over long runs so keep that in mind
 

Reply to SWA or else? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
620
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
954

Similar threads

You would treat it as a TT installation.
2
Replies
29
Views
2K
I assume said contractor is part of a Part P scheme (NICEIC, Napit, few others..) in which case complain to them. They'll investigate (in theory)...
Replies
10
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top