The great pat testing scam | Page 12 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss The great pat testing scam in the Electrical Testing & PAT Testing Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

By all account the tester has most items pre programmed in, press ac on the keypad and it come up with ac adaptor and remembers your last used location, for example office.

if.... and it is an if... what he says is true then 8 hours less lunch and breaks is 7 hours = 420 minutes. 600 tests at 10 seconds a test = 100 minutes leaving 320 minutes to unplug and plug back in appliances and check fuses.

This equates to approx 30 seconds to unplug, check fuse, plug back in again and attach pre printed sticker.

Now looking at this it could be possible however in a 7 hour working day it would be too much i think. he is probably under estimating how much he does or how long he works.

600 x 70p = 420 a day
600 x 80p = 480 a day
600 x ÂŁ1 = ÂŁ600 a day

and so on. personally i would work a 10 hour day for ÂŁ600 thank you please.
 
By all account the tester has most items pre programmed in, press ac on the keypad and it come up with ac adaptor and remembers your last used location, for example office.

Now that would be quite handy.
Assuming all the items are already tested with a scan code label which matches the items on his machine, we're in appliance testing heaven.
I suppose he can get a perfect earth probe contact, in millisecs, on every class I item as well?!?
At least 50% of the items I've ever done, would fail on 1st contact!
 
I have been told (by a spark that in general opinion is highly rated) that with the new seward tester he has that he is averaging 600 a day, working 8-4 in offices etc. Bluetooth printer clipped to belt, and he says the tester will test an appliance in 10 seconds max.

food for thought

Yeah, and the Moon is made of Cheese!! Just another Rhinestone ''PASSING'' Cowboy!! lol!!:cheesy:

Does that 10 seconds include the load test as well?? lol!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can well imagine myself doing pat testing for a living

Test items 1+2+3 in the first half hour then out for a smoke break
Test items 4+5+6, then the boredom means yet another smoke break
By then with a bit of luck, it should be time for the scheduled smoke break

The problem I see with pat testing and getting the quantities out is this draconian no smoking ban
 
haha my boss would have a field day with you guys posting 'PAT testing' hes an old grump and would bring you up on you calling it 'portable appliance testing testing' haha!
 
I have been told (by a spark that in general opinion is highly rated) that with the new seward tester he has that he is averaging 600 a day, working 8-4 in offices etc. Bluetooth printer clipped to belt, and he says the tester will test an appliance in 10 seconds max.

food for thought

When I see claims like this I do wonder about the quality of the end product and if the results could be relied on if something happened resulting in a visit to court then people would see how highly rated he is by the judge

By all account the tester has most items pre programmed in, press ac on the keypad and it come up with ac adaptor and remembers your last used location, for example office.

if.... and it is an if... what he says is true then 8 hours less lunch and breaks is 7 hours = 420 minutes. 600 tests at 10 seconds a test = 100 minutes leaving 320 minutes to unplug and plug back in appliances and check fuses.

This equates to approx 30 seconds to unplug, check fuse, plug back in again and attach pre printed sticker.

Now looking at this it could be possible however in a 7 hour working day it would be too much i think. he is probably under estimating how much he does or how long he works.

600 x 70p = 420 a day
600 x 80p = 480 a day
600 x ÂŁ1 = ÂŁ600 a day

and so on. personally i would work a 10 hour day for ÂŁ600 thank you please.

No matter how it's dressed up it's still only 40ish seconds per appliance. No allowance made for moving between rooms or crawling under desks and there is no way you can input the info into the tester and do the test in 10 seconds even if you skip some of the tests
 
I have been told (by a spark that in general opinion is highly rated) that with the new seward tester he has that he is averaging 600 a day, working 8-4 in offices etc. Bluetooth printer clipped to belt, and he says the tester will test an appliance in 10 seconds max.

food for thought

The description sounds very much like the Seaward Primetest 300 that I use for the local schools. Auto increment number, auto spell description, blutooth printer etc etc. 10 seconds is utter rubbish. It takes nearly 5 seconds to send the label info from the tester to the printer, 10 seconds if you want a bar code. A good visual inspection should take longer than the electrical testing anyway.

My absolute all time best was 320 appliances in one 8.5 hour day, no breaks, 10 mins for lunch and shattered by the end. It was a whole line of IT suites with 80 appliances in each though. Lucrative week that.
 
I'll bet all cheap portable appliance testing companies never give a thought to the fixed appliances they are supposed to test at the same time............. let alone microwave leakage testing.
 
All i was doing was passing on the info that somebody gave to me regards what "he" does in a day. personally we charge ÂŁ1.90 per test minimum and our PAT bloke will do 100 a day.
 
Thought I'd ressurect this thread as I'm back in the same school (repairing lights) and the PAS (portable appliance stickering) boys are in again. I have covered the company name in the pics for legal reasons but suffice to say they are a National Testing Service.
This appliance was 'tested' yesterday.....the guys are on site 6hrs a day and are stickering 300 per man per day.
I also noted that this particular pile of power supplies also had plugs with unsleeved pins on several units,which are used by the pupils.

[ElectriciansForums.net] The great pat testing scam

[ElectriciansForums.net] The great pat testing scam
 
Unfortunately until we can get the client out of the mentality that cheapest is best value for money this will always be a problem. Like with EICR's, they just want the piece of paper to shift risk to whoever has done it .....
 
What powers to be? PAT testing doesnot have a scam who regulates it unlike the scams for Part P.

By 'the powers that be' I meant the school, usually head of maintenance who would of given them the contract in the first place. The schools I work at are very hot on electrical safety and would jump on the company if they had charged for non existant testing.
 

Reply to The great pat testing scam in the Electrical Testing & PAT Testing Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
373
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
939
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Hi all, We have a limited in house PAT testing requirement and were advised that the TIS700 fitted our needs. The unit works fine for 110V and...
Replies
0
Views
1K
I used to do a lot of this. My go - to was testing at the load side of isolators etc where possible. Although of course you'll find plenty of...
Replies
5
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top