I read about 25 pages of various threads and about the only complaint seemed to be one with energy use so far off the scale that there must have been something seriously wrong with the installation.Check the Irish and ex pat Portugese Forums.
Loads and loads of issues, problems, lack of trust in product, lack of reliable data peoples electricity bills going up etc etc.
Too many to list .....
Flat plate solar collector v Thermodynamic solar collector - boards.ie
News: Thermodynamic solar/anytime panels - boards.ie
Beware of Thermodynamic Panels ? | Silver Spray
View attachment 22251
On the other hand there seem to be several well satisfied customers including a couple who've been posting real world electricity consumption figures, with over a years worth of data from Ireland at this link showing weekly electricity consumption varying from 17-23kWh over most of the year, peaking at 33kWh for a single week listed as being below zero for 5 nights. I think that data is for a house of 4 people, with the hot water temperature set to 55 degrees.
that'd be a EUR26 rise in electricity bill over a 9 week period = ~EUR2.90 a week, which seems a lot different to your £10 a week figure.I have two friends at work who have installed the thermodynamic system. One was installed about four weeks ago. The other was installed about nine weeks ago. He has got his bi monthly electricity bill. He says these are rough figures, i think it was an estimated bill aswell. His average bill is usually about 150 and this bill was 176. I know we cant judge anything by this. I am trying to encourage him to buy a watt meter.
and a few more quotes from the threads linked to
Attached is the latest data for the system.
As everyone knows the weather has been very cold all through March and April and now May isn't much better.
No complaints from any of the family so far and happy with the ESB bill.
Well, we have the panels installed a week now and so far we are delighted with them.
a COP of 2.7 for heating water to 55 degrees with ambient air temperature of 15degC is at least on par with decent quality ashp. Using data from panasonic ASHP tables, that should be improved by about 0.3 to a COP of 3.0 ish if the temperature of the tank was lowered to 50 degrees.The report quotes an “Energie” thermodynamic system consuming 4.1 kWh of electricity to heat 250 litres of water from 10°C to 55°C with 15°C ambient temp. The 2.7 COP is “no better, financially or environmentally, than a modern gas boiler).
I also like this bit at the end of the silver spray article
So if Thermodynamic panels can have a good chunk of their winter electricity from the PV panels, they could still be the best solution.
let's just do a quick comparison between an all electric heated situation with solar water heating vs a retrofit thremodynamic system...
60% solar water heating
40% electricity at COP of 1:!
= 40% of electrical input to annual heat generated, equivalent to an annual performance COP of 2.5 (excluding electricity used to power pumps etc)
100% thermodynamic would therefore need to have an average COP of 2.5 through the year to work out better than SWH + immersion - as an average across the year that looks about achievable just based on standard ASHP type COPs alone, add in the solar gain though and it should raise that average COP significantly.
Add in solar PV and the situation changes dramatically as the immersion would largely be drawing power when no sun was available, whereas the thermodynamic system would largely be drawing solar PV generated electricity that would otherwise be exported throughout the year.