Wireless Programmer Advice | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Wireless Programmer Advice in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net

So looking at manual I believe I need to take the Ls to the common of the receiver, and the Lr comes from the NO of the receiver to the Lr on the boiler. Would this be right?
Yes, that's right. It's 230V on those so you could use a 230V from a link in programmer. Either way. ( Double check it is 230v, I'm sure it is but not looked at a Worcester for a few week ).
 
Just trying to get my head around CH in general, so with this being 230v does that mean I don't need to take the feed from the boiler's Ls and Ns terminals, and can take it from a suitable feed, and then just provide it with a Lr at 230v?

I know this probably won't be practical, just trying to get my head around the theory.
 
Just trying to get my head around CH in general, so with this being 230v does that mean I don't need to take the feed from the boiler's Ls and Ns terminals, and can take it from a suitable feed, and then just provide it with a Lr at 230v?

I know this probably won't be practical, just trying to get my head around the theory.

Yes. Sometimes is easier depending on how many cores in flex/cable etc.
It's no prob if it's 230V .
 
So, I think by volt free that doesn't mean there's no voltage on the contacts, just that the voltage is separate from the mains voltage. So, a solenoid that is switched open and shut by the 230v mains, but the contacts on switch are separate and therefore can be any voltage you need? Am I thinking about this correctly?

Therefore, if the boiler takes 230v on the switch you can just link the 230v of the supply to the solenoid to the common, and that way it will send 230v up it when it is closed? However, if the device to be switched need a lower voltage, you instead apply that to the common terminal so that the correct voltage is returned when it is closed?

I think I'm slowly getting my head around this, it's the naming of "volt free" that threw me off.

Why would a boiler not want 230v on the switch, I mean, why would a boiler need a 24v return to switch it? Can you give me an example of a boiler that uses this so I can download the manual and take a look?
 
So, I think by volt free that doesn't mean there's no voltage on the contacts, just that the voltage is separate from the mains voltage. So, a solenoid that is switched open and shut by the 230v mains, but the contacts on switch are separate and therefore can be any voltage you need? Am I thinking about this correctly?

Therefore, if the boiler takes 230v on the switch you can just link the 230v of the supply to the solenoid to the common, and that way it will send 230v up it when it is closed? However, if the device to be switched need a lower voltage, you instead apply that to the common terminal so that the correct voltage is returned when it is closed?

I think I'm slowly getting my head around this, it's the naming of "volt free" that threw me off.

Why would a boiler not want 230v on the switch, I mean, why would a boiler need a 24v return to switch it? Can you give me an example of a boiler that uses this so I can download the manual and take a look?

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&r...47.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEEZPLuEg435Gdc-mejUBX16zKfbg

Have a look at Vaillant. All three ideas/methods are available with those.

There's 230V, 24V and ebus. ebus is specific to Vaillant.

As far as volt free goes, that is a funny thing to get your head around. I always think of it as a circuit that doesn't actually run anything by itself, directly.

In my case a volt free circuit normally includes a PCB. So the switching is done via components on that board like transistors, relays etc. Things like volt free switching on a room stat would just close a circuit for the board to recognise.

Some say that volt free is Free, as in Free like non specific.
 
Well I read one article that said volt free just means the relay contacts are separate (free) from the supply voltage. Then I read another article saying volt free means exactly that, there isn't a voltage sitting present but some circuit board wizardry is watching the cable for continuity - and when the switch is closed it picks up on the continuity and acts on it.
 
The controls should really be fed from the LS terminal within the boiler so they are protected by the internal fuse. This way its connected in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.
 
The controls should really be fed from the LS terminal within the boiler so they are protected by the internal fuse. This way its connected in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.

Not all MF's say that and the only thing that should be supplied via that particular circuit is the switching of it.
So in the case of a Programmer, you wouldn't run the L N supply to a programmer from the boiler and definitely not from that source, so you wouldn't be protecting the control itself with the internal fuse anyway !
The switch circuit ( in this case Lr Ls ) is to tell the board to fire the boiler. The boilers internal functions and components e.g. Pump, fan etc are powered via the permanent live supply.
 
Not all MF's say that and the only thing that should be supplied via that particular circuit is the switching of it.
So in the case of a Programmer, you wouldn't run the L N supply to a programmer from the boiler and definitely not from that source, so you wouldn't be protecting the control itself with the internal fuse anyway !
The switch circuit ( in this case Lr Ls ) is to tell the board to fire the boiler. The boilers internal functions and components e.g. Pump, fan etc are powered via the permanent live supply.
Hightower says its a worcster bosch 25si so yes the programmer should be fed from the LS/230V out terminal if you follow the manufacturers instructions/diagrams.
 
Last edited:
Hightower says its a worcster bosch 25si so yes the programmer should be fed from the LS/230V out terminal if you follow the manufacturers instructions/diagrams.

It does say that, you would however be running the Programmer via the board which I personally don't like the idea of for numerous reasons.
I prefer the programmer to take it's supply from the system wiring. If you ring Worcester tech, they'll tell you its a suggested way of doing it, not a must. It is a provision they make. There is more than one way to skin a cat. There is no harm in feeding a switched live to the boiler Lr.
 

Reply to Wireless Programmer Advice in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
311
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
834
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
940

Similar threads

H
  • Article
Boiler Programmer I have a wall mounted thermostat which is connected to a 26 volt supply from my Glowworm 24ci boiler. I would like to replace...
Replies
0
Views
101
homebrewer55
H
S
  • Article
Electrician Boiler Fault Boiler Fault I’m hoping someone can help with this boiler problem. Couple have just moved into a house that has a Grant...
Replies
0
Views
239
S

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top