mattg4321

-
Arms

Not sure if this has been posted before but it just goes to show that eventually someone does get hurt. We’ve all seen loads of jobs where we wonder how it didn’t kill someone.

The terminology in the article is bad, but reading between the lines it sounds like no rcd protection and no cpc at class 1 outside lights. Probably poorly fitted too no doubt. By an ‘electrician’ with 50 years experience! He should really be facing jail time imo.

It doesn’t surprise me that it was a pub. Most of them are death traps from what I’ve seen.
 
We don't know the exact details of course, but it was my understanding that he did a first fix for the lights, but didn't return for final connections - this being done by someone else (landlord?) Hence he couldn't actually be directly responsible in the death, but could be in the general dereliction of duty of care.
It will be useful to know the practical details - but I think i read that he was pressed on not doing "live tests", which suggests that he didn't just do a first fix?

It would appear the issue was with lack of earthing somewhere and the poor kid touching a fence while sitting on a light? - but there are several details that won't be covered by 'mainstream' reporting - did anything trip but not before a fatal shock - was it on a suitable OPCD etc....

Bet CED won't appreciate the picture of "their" consumer unit appearing everywhere (though make appears to have had no part to play)
 
From what I can make out having read a few of the news reports: it seems the lights weren't actually switched on when the boy was electrocuted. There was no earth to the CU supplying the lighting circuit, and the fault that caused the light's casing to go live may have been elsewhere on the installation. Hard to know for sure, the reports being written by laypeople for laypeople.

We don't know the exact details of course, but it was my understanding that he did a first fix for the lights, but didn't return for final connections - this being done by someone else (landlord?) Hence he couldn't actually be directly responsible in the death, but could be in the general dereliction of duty of care.
Very worrying if this is the case. You could find yourself doing time for something you had left disconnected.
 
Very worrying if this is the case. You could find yourself doing time for something you had left disconnected.
I think that's really the point why he wasn't found guilty - his defence was as he had not actually finished the work, and the final connection was done by others, that's the time when he would have found any issues if there were any.

He wasn't found guilty in direct relation to this work, so being able to prove he left it disconnected saved him really.

The guilty conviction was in relation to other aspects.
 
Very worrying if this is the case. You could find yourself doing time for something you had left disconnected.
I think this case is about far more than the light that was the trigger for the tragic death.

From what Julie said it is likely that the manslaughter charge was unsuccessful on the technical point that he did not complete the work that lead to the death, but the HSE violation would be from the knowledge he had (or should have had, given his purported skills and the norms of the industry to check such matters) that the electrics were is a dangerous state but that he did nothing.

I think the analogy would be uncovering a C1 during an EICR and simply ignoring it.
 
Apart from the tragic situation, loss and bodgery of all of this, I think the largest lesson that I'm taking away from it is absolutely the need for all of us to ensure that paperwork - so often that thing we like least - is bang on and able to cover your arse should the need, sadly, arise.
 
Apart from the tragic situation, loss and bodgery of all of this, I think the largest lesson that I'm taking away from it is absolutely the need for all of us to ensure that paperwork - so often that thing we like least - is bang on and able to cover your arse should the need, sadly, arise.

It's often said, but frequently missed, "it's not whether you have done it or not, it's whether you can prove it or not!"
 
I always worked on the adage that if something is not in writing it was not said, that way you don't get into the "he said, they said" it is so easy for someone to say "I don't remember that conversation", having it in writing dispels that immediately, used to take copious notes at meetings and always disputed the minutes taken by the project manager (Architect normally) if at odds with my notes, it always seemed they issued minutes in accordance with what they wished they'd said, not what was said, I used to fill an A4 note book about once every two months, all telephone conversations where always noted down on the information card for that company.
 
I always worked on the adage that if something is not in writing it was not said, that way you don't get into the "he said, they said" it is so easy for someone to say "I don't remember that conversation", having it in writing dispels that immediately, used to take copious notes at meetings and always disputed the minutes taken by the project manager (Architect normally) if at odds with my notes, it always seemed they issued minutes in accordance with what they wished they'd said, not what was said, I used to fill an A4 note book about once every two months, all telephone conversations where always noted down on the information card for that company.

When dealing with contractors and consultants "If they said good morning, I would want it in writing before I confirmed it in return..."

... best line I ever heard spoken (that was a long time ago, before I was a contractor, now I are one!!!)
 
My guys used to always have a duplicate book with them, any consultant that gave instructions to then had to sign the book to that effect and was given a copy, equally they would give instructions to any sub-contractor in writing, saved or supported any claims made by either party.
 
My guys used to always have a duplicate book with them, any consultant that gave instructions to then had to sign the book to that effect and was given a copy, equally they would give instructions to any sub-contractor in writing, saved or supported any claims made by either party.
Sensible system... I might start using that routine with the wife... would avoid a lot of arguments.
 
Avoid arguments, but not necessarily black eye's.

I should not have said your bum looks big in everything.
Yeah. My other half is a 6' red-haired Australian, I've learned to duck quickly. Very, quickly.
 

Not sure if this has been posted before but it just goes to show that eventually someone does get hurt. We’ve all seen loads of jobs where we wonder how it didn’t kill someone.

The terminology in the article is bad, but reading between the lines it sounds like no rcd protection and no cpc at class 1 outside lights. Probably poorly fitted too no doubt. By an ‘electrician’ with 50 years experience! He should really be facing jail time imo.

It doesn’t surprise me that it was a pub. Most of them are death traps from what I’ve seen.
Bottom line: 12 months sentence for killing a child. AND he asked for a reduction in sentence (which was denied). I'd say that sums up the laws view and the man's character in one.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Back
Top