OP
pennywise
I can't wait for what's going to come
Discuss **Show Us Your Installs!!!** in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net
It's designed into the spec of an installation, "Just in case" some numpty who thinks he knows it all and more than the Regs comes along and replaces a section of steel conduit with plastic because it's easier or gets around the problem of threading a section that may be installed through a floor etc..
I agree with the above. Conduit, trunking, chassis of switchgear ect are all suitable for use as CPC, and I don't see a problem with continuing that. I do however see a problem with bad workmanship, but the same goes for systems where a CPC has been pulled in, any numpty could break the continuity with a bad termination. Testing should weed this out, but we cant guarantee we have seen everything.I really can't believe what i'm reading here, the what if this, what if that, scenario's is totally irrelevant, you install any system installation as to the project drawings, what happens after, is not your problem or responsibility!! Your making up these scenarios to suit your argument, but frankly in the real world there is no argument to provide pointless CPC provisions where none is required or needed, ...end of!!
Fly leads are fly leads, of course they are required at accessories and fittings. Even if flexible conduits were completely plastic, what would be the trouble using the threaded earth connection of a BESA or any other box/enclosure for your CPC connection to equipment via short lengths of flexible conduit?? Been used successfully for this purpose, for connecting say motors and other required equipment for bloody years, so what's suddenly changed now then??
If sections are removed and replaced with PVC containment, then it is the responsibility of the electrician making those changes, to provide CPC provision. Same goes for any other alteration to an existing metal containment system. None warrant running in separate CPC's to the system in the first instance...
Were running in miles of metal containment systems, and when i say miles i mean miles!! Do you really think it makes any economic sense to run separate CPC's?? Bloody hell, the size of the conduits would need upgrading to the next size in most cases, just to keep within the fill restrictions. Needless to say, there will be no separate CPC's in our metal containment systems (trunking and conduits). You and others, that are foolish enough to do so, can get on and do whatever you like, ...all i can say, something has gone very wrong somewhere along the line on metal containment systems in the UK!! You've all gone stark raving Mad!! lol!!
...all i can say, something has gone very wrong somewhere along the line on metal containment systems in the UK!! You've all gone stark raving Mad!! lol!!
I personally feel that this "dumbing down" is to the detriment of every professional within this industry, but it's happening, and I can't see it stopping.
So do we accept this dumbing down or try to make common sense prevail?
If the collages held up high standards and not just focus on the quick buck we may get somewhere. The collages will churn out as many ill-informed installers as they can.
To lower the price you have to lower the standard. A basic fact of economics. You want a good containment system it costs, DI Joe will bodge it together and probably add to the cost.
You looking for this place?
You looking for this place?
You looking for this place?
I really can't believe what i'm reading here, the what if this, what if that, scenario's is totally irrelevant, you install any system installation as to the project drawings, what happens after, is not your problem or responsibility!! Your making up these scenarios to suit your argument, but frankly in the real world there is no argument to provide pointless CPC provisions where none is required or needed, ...end of!!
Fly leads are fly leads, of course they are required at accessories and fittings. Even if flexible conduits were completely plastic, what would be the trouble using the threaded earth connection of a BESA or any other box/enclosure for your CPC connection to equipment via short lengths of flexible conduit?? Been used successfully for this purpose, for connecting say motors and other required equipment for bloody years, so what's suddenly changed now then??
If sections are removed and replaced with PVC containment, then it is the responsibility of the electrician making those changes, to provide CPC provision. Same goes for any other alteration to an existing metal containment system. None warrant running in separate CPC's to the system in the first instance...
Were running in miles of metal containment systems, and when i say miles i mean miles!! Do you really think it makes any economic sense to run separate CPC's?? Bloody hell, the size of the conduits would need upgrading to the next size in most cases, just to keep within the fill restrictions. Needless to say, there will be no separate CPC's in our metal containment systems (trunking and conduits). You and others, that are foolish enough to do so, can get on and do whatever you like, ...all i can say, something has gone very wrong somewhere along the line on metal containment systems in the UK!! You've all gone stark raving Mad!! lol!!
The only thing i've failed to understand, is what sort of morons are writing/producing these spec's, that call for CPC's in metal containment systems!!
My comments above, were towards your leaning on the side of CPC's now being required in a metallic containment system.
I was not leaning either way, I simply reproduced two of the relevant Regs for people to read and decide for themselves and state why sparks install them, because they are in the specs of an install and so they install them as required.
You can read it any way you want.
A couple of things.......
If you were to leave a little more length in the CU then you would be able to get the cables a little neater.
The fly leads in the accessories shouldn't be coiled
You do not really need the fly leads as you have cpc's run in and the conduit is earthed at the CU, and the back boxes are fixed lug. The only time you really need fly leads is if you have no cpc's and you are using the conduit as your means of earthing.
These are just pointers and are not criticisms!!, overall it's a nice install and a bloody good job compared to a lot of college work I see!
Couple of observations;
- The layout of the conduit should have been considered so that they did not need to cross
- Conductor length needs attention, if you look at one of the browns in the spur you can see where it has been rubbed when the faceplate screwed back.
I appreciate a lot comes with experience, but it's things like the scuffed cable that can cause you problems both in college and the real world, I would be none to impressed when testing a new install to find that.
And I coiled them because... I just wanted to do so (it looked more "cool" when it was not stretched) . I cannot understand why not to do that.. To avoid inductance from being produced or something?
The very reason I would make you take any coiled earth bond out!
And further to the debate that has gone on, please let's not confuse the subject for the op! We all know that E54 is correct in that a continuous metatarsal containment system does not require a seperate cpc.......... However!, in the words of E54 ("if it was one of my projects it would be done..............")
As everyone is quick to point out, if its in the spec or if the engineer demands it then it must be done that way. Well on this occasion the spec set by the college and C&G calls for seperate cpc's so seperate cpc's is what the op has installed.
I suspect the reason they do it this way is so that they can teach 6 wire Rfc's and metal containment at the same time.
Tsakitsan;769822[B said:][/B]And for the general arguement about installing a separate cpc inside the already earthed CU, I just wanted to say that is an ACOP .. NOT compulsory as everyone knows but it can be used against you in the court of law "JUST IN CASE" something did actually go wrong.
E54, I am curious, your tag states your in China, and I appreciate that may or may not be the case, but have you actually seen the quality of sparks being turned out in the UK these days, have you see the so called quality of their tube work and trunking...seriously I have seen conduit work so bad i would be tempted to ask them to a put an earth tag across each and every flipping joint to be sure. I appreciate we cannot tar all with the same brush but JTL and the 5WWW providers have a lot to answer for and perhaps this helps to explain why some designers/engineers are spec'ing cpc's in metal containment systems.
It seems the electrical industry has been fragmented and de-skilled to a level/point that it'll never recover from. I don't particularly want to see, or be any part of that, i prefer to remember our industry as it once was, ...a highly respected and proud industry!!
Well big boys, Tony and E54 etc, if you're that passionate about it, why don't you start hassling the people who are perpetrating all this rubbish.
Whinging away on an Internet forum will get you now where.
I don't know the answer,but I'm sure there is one.
Tony, you're retired now, start lobbying or something (I don't know!), with Wifi you can do it from the pub.
Well big boys, Tony and E54 etc, if you're that passionate about it, why don't you start hassling the people who are perpetrating all this rubbish.
Whinging away on an Internet forum will get you now where.
I don't know the answer,but I'm sure there is one.
Tony, you're retired now, start lobbying or something (I don't know!), with Wifi you can do it from the pub.
Absolute Rubbish!!
You'll have far more chance of the Separate CPC's failing, than the metal containment system. Along with more chance of failing compliance on conduit fill ratio's. ....lol!!
Next you'll be telling us to run T&E cables in metal containment systems...
Well big boys, Tony and E54 etc, if you're that passionate about it, why don't you start hassling the people who are perpetrating all this rubbish.
Whinging away on an Internet forum will get you now where.
I don't know the answer,but I'm sure there is one.
Tony, you're retired now, start lobbying or something (I don't know!), with Wifi you can do it from the pub.
Search around there are plenty of threads on it, or that have become it
Domestic board swap done this afternoon not a great photo done by phone. Well that's my excuse anyway. View attachment 19120
Absolute Rubbish!!
You'll have far more chance of the Separate CPC's failing, than the metal containment system. Along with more chance of failing compliance on conduit fill ratio's. ....lol!!
Next you'll be telling us to run T&E cables in metal containment systems...
That is a work of art, can't see any spare ways, but regardless a work of artDomestic board swap done this afternoon not a great photo done by phone. Well that's my excuse anyway. View attachment 19120
Clearly a case of ' I bought this roll of tape, and by God i'm gonna use it' syndromeSomeone seems to have gone over the top with the asbestos labels at work...
Just 1 on the main switch. Would of been 2 spare but had to split the ring into 2 radials. The price for it is crap on this contract but I try to still keep it half decent despite the price. Price work breeds **** work and apprentices who are taught on price are a recipe for disaster but that's for another time .That is a work of art, can't see any spare ways, but regardless a work of art
I actually got out of the office and went to site with my tools last week. I was there and working for a full day installing a panel I had previously put together in the workshop....a full day.... I even impressed myself. I was going to post a few pictures but the camera's in the car, it's raining and I only have socks on so it will have to wait for anther night.
Hidden them, or just tidied up?
Reply to **Show Us Your Installs!!!** in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net