elios 4 u and power diverter can be configured in 10W increments from 10W, which is useful when paired with battery systems as when configured at 10W the 2 conflict and draw from the battery in 10W increments until the full 3kW is being pulled from the battery. Set it up at 100W and that doesn't...
4.32 is utterly nuts, why would anyone attempt to defraud the FIT scheme by paying more to import the electricity than they'd get paid to export it?
I'm pretty much certain that there is no import tariff available that's set lower than the export rate, so this is complete nonsense.
you should also check for faulty varistors with earth faults, as it will show up as an earth fault if there is a faulty varistor. That should hopefully be a simple part to swap out, but I don't know the mastervolt inverters.
can you show the workings for how the figures would stack up for charging on economy 7 to offset standard electricity rates?
I've not seen anyone so far be able to actually make those figures work without excluding the actual usage costs of the battery (in terms of the lifecycles of the battery...
16 or 20A dual pole MCB is how we usually do it, though single pole will be fine if there's already an isolator for the circuit next to the consumer unit.
as I say, this could be something that MCS could do with issuing a technical briefing / statement on - they were the organisation that OFgem worked with to release guidelines for TIC definition, but until that point I'm going to go with the interpretation that if it doesn't actually result in...
Ultimately at this stage all that should matter is whether or not the change will have any significant impact on the overall annual generation figure. If the answer is no, then it shouldn't impact on the FIT side of things, nor need a new MCS cert as long as there's documentation to explain why...
The wording doesn't mention TIC, it mentions generating capacity, and on a string inverter adding the odd higher rated panel has bugger all impact on the generation capacity.
I suspect ofgem have worded that deliberately to avoid using the term TIC or DNC precisely to avoid this sort of situation.
This ought to fall into this category, unfortunately some FIT suppliers may not actually understand how solar PV works and may view adding a single higher capacity panel to a string to be an increase in capacity, ignoring the basic fact that the string will output at the capacity of the lowest...
It won't have any positive impact on generation though (assuming it's a string inverter), so I don't see that this applies.
It's effectively just a straight replacement of faulty kit, if the exact replacement isn't available then go with the closest match and give the customer a statement about...
some are, but if done in addition to a 16A solar inverter to take the total above 16amps means they'd need to be G59 certified, which most aren't.
I'd be inclined to argue that the actual plant is still designed not to export more than 16amps to the grid - ie the DNC of the plant is still...
I've been doing some investigation into this and am waiting for further clarification from Ofgem, and STA have queried it with DECC.
I think there's a workaround where the EPC for the new build could be produced prior to the PV being commissioned - ie if the PV is not connected up to the mains...
not true.
The DNO only needs to know if there is a new grid connected inverter, the inverter still can't output more than it previously did and would cut out in the event of grid failure (or working on the line) under the G83 protection settings, there is nothing for the DNO to be concerned...
does this return into the 2nd MPPT on the inverter?
If so then it's installed correctly.
Not sure why anyone is talking about DNO notification as nothing has changed, it's still only the SMA inverter connected to the grid, the growatt is connected through the inverter.
erm, it's winter, PV...
yes, I'd checked all of that out, a few weeks ago, as well as asking several FIT suppliers, pretty bad that it's taken until 3 weeks after the scheme restarted for this to come out. We're on the verge of installing 2-3 of these systems on the basis that they'd still get export payments.
I think it applies to any systems that would want to be paid the guaranteed export rate. Nothing to stop them negotiating to be paid separately, eg Good Energy do a different export payment arrangement for above 30kWp systems, but for smaller systems the metering costs would be prohibitive I think.
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc