9.5 kw shower on 6mm ? | Page 13 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss 9.5 kw shower on 6mm ? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
bristol
just been to a job , saw that the shower 9.5 kw is on 6mm t&e the cable goes in the wall and under floor boards ,No insulation, to the board (A cable run of no more than 10 m) . I said downgrade the shower to 8.5 max. Is it really necessary ? never quite sure , its borderline to me .
 
If you design your circuits correctly you must be aware that.
As a 9.5KW shower draws 41.3A you are unable to use a 40A MCB You need to use the next size up. This would be a 45A
it is correct that the tabulated current carrying capacity of a 6mm T&E cable is 46A this is the value prior to any correction factors being taken to account. I would suggest that the there are multiple cables exiting the DB at the same place so the grouping factor will reduce the cable rating below 41.3A without taking into account any other factors.
It is not acceptable to assume that no harm will be caused to the cable as the shower will only be on for a short while or the loading is only 1A over the 40A MCB rating.
When the electrical installation certificate is issued you are sating that the installation complys with BS 7671 and is a legal document in the event of future problems.
I would suggest if this size shower is to be installed a 10mm cable minimum cable should be used. Pay now or pay later.

Youre correct of course but your example is out of context to the original post.
The issue that was debated at the start is regarding utilizing an existing cable so as to reduce cost / inconvienience to the customer in having a bigger cable installed.
Its a judgement call that each person will assess differently , but in my experience a 9.5kw shower will run off 6mm with absolutley no problems for years , regardless of any calcs you want to throw at it.
 
Youre correct of course but your example is out of context to the original post.
The issue that was debated at the start is regarding utilizing an existing cable so as to reduce cost / inconvienience to the customer in having a bigger cable installed.
Its a judgement call that each person will assess differently , but in my experience a 9.5kw shower will run off 6mm with absolutley no problems for years , regardless of any calcs you want to throw at it.

His example is not out of context. He's just shown the calculation showing that 6mm is not big enough! The MCB is not even big enough to take the load of the shower regardless what a clamp meter shows.

Don't take this the wrong way but "in my experience" will not stand up in court. Also how would u fill out the test sheet - "comments on installation- 'I know the calculations state a 40amp mcb is not suitable for a 9.5kw shower along with using 6mm t+e but in my experience it SHOULD be fine'

That's rediculas THERE IS NO GREY AREA

40A mcb + 6mm cable is unsuitable for 9.5kw shower according to the 17th edition IEE wiring regulations regardless of personal opinion, that is fact, law, gospel.

You have two options down size the shower to suit the circuit or upgrade the circuit to suit the shower.
 
Just done new CU installations on a property with three showers - two 9.5 one 8.5. They're all on 4mm on 32A breakers. Asked owner about trips but never appears to have happened. Feed water temperature to the shower is a key factor in power drawn - which is why clamping a shower in summer doesn't tell you anything. I think in the case of this property the cold feeds to all three showers travel through a lot of internal plumbing, so water never really that cold.
 
One of the biggest problems is what happens after youve installed your shower you do all the calculations select the correct cable then along comes the home improvement energy saving bods and sticks 300mm of insulation right over the top of it , when you look at the de rating factors of cable then for showers we should be installing them in 16mm just in case they are covered in insulation in the future
 
Quite right when replacing a shower the electrician should make a judgment on the existing installation. If the cable is not big enough to feed the new load the customer should be informed, what is required to comply with BS7671. It is not a case of it will do or I have never had a problem before I have known these showers run on a 4mm cable with no problems. It is your responsibility to comply with the green book.
It is not acceptable to pass the responsibility to the customer by asking them to sign a piece of paper to cover you. The buck stops with you. As they are hiring you as a skilled and informed person.
The loading of a shower is not dependent upon the water temperature. The only effect this will have if any is the is the amount of time the element is heating this will have a negligible effect.
 
One of the biggest problems is what happens after youve installed your shower you do all the calculations select the correct cable then along comes the home improvement energy saving bods and sticks 300mm of insulation right over the top of it , when you look at the de rating factors of cable then for showers we should be installing them in 16mm just in case they are covered in insulation in the future

That makes sense, Nick, but where do you draw the line? If you have to future-proof your installation you'd need to make worse case scenarios assumptions for all your circuit derating calcs - not just for showers.
 
His example is not out of context. He's just shown the calculation showing that 6mm is not big enough! The MCB is not even big enough to take the load of the shower regardless what a clamp meter shows.

The mcb is to protect the cable not the load , which it does.

Don't take this the wrong way but "in my experience" will not stand up in court. Also how would u fill out the test sheet - "comments on installation- 'I know the calculations state a 40amp mcb is not suitable for a 9.5kw shower along with using 6mm t+e but in my experience it SHOULD be fine'

Court ? Who's going to court ? Has anyone ever ended up in court from connecting a 9.5kw shower to a 6mm cable ?
Stop being a drama queen.


That's rediculas THERE IS NO GREY AREA

Ridiculous even ?

40A mcb + 6mm cable is unsuitable for 9.5kw shower according to the 17th edition IEE wiring regulations regardless of personal opinion, that is fact, law, gospel.

Bs7671 isnt law , that is fact.

You have two options down size the shower to suit the circuit or upgrade the circuit to suit the shower.

I was trying to keep the debate polite and reasonable before all the pedantic know-alls all jumped in.
Get your facts straight next time.
 
Correct BS7671 is not law. However the Electricity at work regulations are and it refures to BS7671 as a standard so in a court anybody being prosecuted will have to prove compliance. This applies to any electrical work undertaken not just showers. The MCB is to protect the cable just as the rating factors are used to down rate the current carrying capacitys of the cable. I fail to see how good electrical theory can be classed as pedantic.
 
Oooo brilliant i've just sat down for my lunch i definitely think ill be staying to watch this little firework display unfold. How exciting, yet ANOTHER feeble display of bickery.

I would have thought it was a fairly straight forward answer however? Stick with what the regs recommend - and you can do no wrong. Is that not the basis on which we as electricians design and guide our circuits around to adhere to safe and proper practice? Or have i missed something where personal opinion counts for more than the governing body by which we all follow. But i don't know.... that's just my opinion. Am i allowed to say that or do i have to note that as a departure :stuart:
 
I am still amazed at how many people think that British electric showers are a variable load. 8.5kw is 8.5kw, regardless of anything (except variations in supply voltage ofc). If you select the "economy mode", which tbh nobody ever does, then it will be a lower fixed load, but still fixed....
 
The cable size must be suitable for the load, no matter what overcurrent protection is provided. No reference method has been mentioned, but if it is "A" then 6mm is rated at 32A, method 100 rated at 34A, and 101 would be only 27A.
A 9.5 kW shower would draw 41.3A.
I have seen a few cases where the shower isolator is starting to disintegrate due to the high load and a situation where the contact resistance continues to increase. This, along with the inadequate cable current capacity is a fire risk. The conclusion must be that the shower in the quoted case must be rewired or the shower replaced with the correct rating.
The overcurrent protection should match the load but not exceed the cable current rating.
 
Just to add my tuppence worth,
I have seen many, many 8kw and above showers wired in 2.5mm flex from the isolator to the actual shower unit in my time testing, none of which showed any signs of damage, poor terminals and terminations cause many more,
I think in an ideal world there should be a 'domestic shower diversity' added to the regs, it irritates be to give a code 6mm supplying showers in houses, in fact I often give it a code 3 rather then 2 if there is no heat damage.

I hope you are not condoning 8kw showers being fed with 2.5mm cable. :)
 
i cant be bothered to read through them 10 pages but has anyone thought what the manufacturer wants to keep the warranty in place normally correct fuse rating to the bs7671 and an rcd in place "just my 2penny worth"
 

Reply to 9.5 kw shower on 6mm ? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Sticky
  • Article
Wicked I've just actually looked through it and it's very smart. Some good stuff in it. There's a tile association company that do a magazine...
Replies
2
Views
351
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
313
  • Article
Hi everyone, Another weekend, another sale! Get ready for colder days with Haverland Radiators, combining efficiency with modern design. Keep...
Replies
0
Views
367

Similar threads

  • Question
BS3871 type 3's have a similar shaped operating curve to BS60898 type C's. Any fault that will meet the disconnection time of 5s (for 63A...
Replies
5
Views
2K
I own a top floor tenement flat that I used to live in and then rented out after I married. It is currently empty whilst some work is being done...
Replies
0
Views
550

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top