You may be right... the approach taken by Sweden may be right... but the problem is that the media run the country ! And the generally left wing media have dictated that ANY deaths that are attributed to Covid-19 are the responsibility of the government for not doing something to stop it.Lockdown is an abject failure of policy and based on highly questionable "science". There is no doubt in my mind that these types of response will lead to more deaths than COVID-19. (There is also little evidence that they will reduce the COVID-19 deaths either.) And judging deaths with COVID-19 as deaths by COVID-19 is inherently dishonest.
I notice that the BBC even ran a programme tonight to blame the government... I didn't watch the programme, I hasten to add, but why have a programme about it anyway ???
The simple fact is... that the NHS (generally, not all those nurses !), PHE and all the other associated quangos are totally unfit for purpose ! The lockdown is all about not overloading them... if we had a sensibly run health system and a sensible media... we could probably have avoided any lockdown...
[automerge]1588026944[/automerge]
I assume you take your other income as dividends which you take as owners. The furlough scheme is for employees... so it seems perfectly sensible to me that you only get furlough payments on your PAYE portion.We both paid around £500 less tax last year than a sole trader would have, yet we can only furlough for the PAYE portion of our income.
I'm a shareholder in some businesses but I wouldn't expect in a million years to get government money for loss of dividends !
[automerge]1588027368[/automerge]
Matt... the problem is that it is VERY VERY difficult to come up with a scheme that benefits only those that should get some benefit. And even if that was easily possible, it needs to be done in a few days !! All government functions work very very slowly... it'll take months to implement any agreed scheme.Government needs to come up with a grant for businesses without premises IMO.
There was a story today about how a grant scheme for Cornish businesses had given large amounts of money to second home owners... because they were running properties as FHL (furnished holiday lets) so were a legitimate business. Of course, this was not at all the intention of the scheme, but how do you remove some businesses but include others ???
Last edited: