I personally think every scenario is different.
Accessibility comes into it in my opinion.
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.
 
If there is blanks missing from a CU what code would this be.
Scenario 1 .. 6 blanks missing from a CU in a corridor cupboard
Scenario 2 8 blanks missing from a locked corridor cupboard

Looking at 3 diffrent reports they have same faults but have been coded differently.

If the report(s) contained any C1's, shouldn't they have had the necessary remedial action taken immediately?
 
I personally think every scenario is different.
Accessibility comes into it in my opinion.
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.
Risk assessment, method statement...…..and screw the cover back....? ;)
 
I personally think every scenario is different.
Accessibility comes into it in my opinion.
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.
I would have screwed it back on.
 
Risk assessment, method statement...…..and screw the cover back....? ;)
Enclosure had the threads missing from the plastic back box or I’d have just fixed it back.
Presumably it’s been like that from day 1 and nobody could be arsed to change the surface box so left it.
Building was built around 2004/5 as it’s brown/blue coloured wiring but the consumer units are split load 16th edition stranded
 
Risk assessment, method statement...…..and screw the cover back....? ;)
Enclosure had the threads missing from the plastic back box or I’d have just fixed it back.
Presumably it’s been like that from day 1 and nobody could be arsed to change the surface box so left it.
Building was built around 2004/5 as it’s brown/blue coloured wiring but the consumer units are split load 16th edition stranded so will have been like that since installed
 
I personally think every scenario is different.
Accessibility comes into it in my opinion.
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.
No light, hands groping round in the dark?? Ladder or not C1 all day long.

Your not there to do any favours, your there to cover YOUR arse not theirs.
 
Any live working requires Risk assesment and method statements. Not just restricted access. As I said you shouldnt be working live not cant work live.

All works require RAMS. Not just live working.


In order to test and fault find you will almost certainly have to work live.
 
No light, hands groping round in the dark?? Ladder or not C1 all day long.

Your not there to do any favours, your there to cover YOUR arse not theirs.
It’s nowhere near the loft hatch.
You need to crawl in and across the walk boards to access it.
I never said I didn’t code it (C2) incase you care.
It’s my discretion as the inspector and no body else’s.
 
No light, hands groping round in the dark?? Ladder or not C1 all day long.

Your not there to do any favours, your there to cover YOUR arse not theirs.

No you are there to give a concise report on the electrical installation as you find it and code appropriatly not code to ‘cover your arse’.
 
So all these Code 1s people dish out do you give notification of it on the day in writing.
 
It’s nowhere near the loft hatch.
You need to crawl in and across the walk boards to access it.
I never said I didn’t code it (C2) incase you care.
It’s my discretion as the inspector and no body else’s.
It’s nowhere near the loft hatch.
You need to crawl in and across the walk boards to access it.
I never said I didn’t code it (C2) incase you care.
It’s my discretion as the inspector and no body else’s.
Your arse too.

With this type of thing you have to reword your decision in the patronising tones of a prosecution barrister.

But as you rightly say it’s your call.
 
So all these Code 1s people dish out do you give notification of it on the day in writing.

Email the EICR to bill payer

For urgent attention in subject box if C1s.

Chat with site if it’s something horrendous, don’t lick that bit kind of chat, you know the one.
 
Your arse too.

With this type of thing you have to reword your decision in the patronising tones of a prosecution barrister.

But as you rightly say it’s your call.
Again there’s a potential of danger but I can’t see an immediate risk to life hence no c1
It is a loft which is locked at a height in a block of communal flats to which no one has access.
I’ll live with my judgement and will sleep at night.
The report has an unsatisfactory outcome amongst other contributing factors so I believe my arse is indeed covered.
 
No. That path leads to non payment.

C1 requires immediate attention as it's immediate danger. If I come across any C1's, I inform the client immediately and make safe. Never had a problem with not getting paid when highlighting and acting on a dangerous situation.Better that than some kiddy comes along and sticks their mitts into it. Recently carried out an EICR on a rental property and I came across a young lad playing with the fuse board in the cupboard under the stairs.
 
C1 requires immediate attention as it's immediate danger. If I come across any C1's, I inform the client immediately and make safe. Never had a problem with not getting paid when highlighting and acting on a dangerous situation.Better that than some kiddy comes along and sticks their mitts into it. Recently carried out an EICR on a rental property and I came across a young lad playing with the fuse board in the cupboard
me says this on post #30 ,but is down to the test engineer what he puts down .once you have put any defects on the test sheet .and covered your a77. it now down to the customer .
 
[Q
me says this on post #30 ,but is down to the test engineer what he puts down .once you have put any defects on the test sheet .and covered your a77. it now down to the customer .

Most of my clients are Landlords who really don't want to end up in court and would rather I fix there and then if possible to avoid further call outs and risk to tenants. It's their call at the end of the day but for a simple fix like a missing blank it's better safe than sorry.
 
The problem arises when asked what work was done .can lead to disputes. And as a larger company sometimes it's seen as an open checkbook.

Yes, that's a good point and Buzzlightyears too. I guess that as a one man band with a good working relationship with my clients it comes down to trust. Now then, where did I park my Buggatti Chiron?:D
 
A Code 1 (C1) observation means ‘Danger present, risk of injury, Immediate remedial action required.’ It is an immediate threat and should be rectified or made safe as soon as possible. An example of a C1 defect would be accessible live conductors due to damage, poorly modified enclosures or removed maintenance panels. Incorrect polarity would also attract a code C1 as it may allow conductive parts, not normally expected to be live, to become live.

The presence of a code C1 warrants immediate action to be taken which would be to inform the duty holder or responsible person for the installation immediately, both verbally and in writing, of the risk of injury that exists.

A Code 2 (C2) is a potentially dangerous defect, these might be things that don’t pose an immediate threat but are likely to become a danger in the future. A C2 is described as ‘Potentially dangerous – urgent remedial action required.’

The phrase “potentially dangerous”, in the C2 code is designed to point towards a risk of injury from contact with live parts after a sequence of events. A sequence of events could mean that an individual may gain access to live parts through a day to day task that would not be expected to give access to live parts.

An observation code FI is described as ‘Further investigation required without delay.’ This means that your electrical contractor has observed something whilst carrying out the testing for instance emergency lights seem very dim. This might not have been covered in the report so they have noted it separately as code FI.

Codes C1 and C2 attract unsatisfactory report findings and you’ll have to have these defects rectified in order to prove compliance. A report could also be classed as unsatisfactory if the only fault codes are FI. An example would be when there are lots of circuits that are not verified at the time of testing, this is because the inspector would not be able to categorically say that these circuits are safe or not.

Code 3 is described as ‘Improvement recommended.’ This means it does not comply with the regulations but isn’t actually dangerous. A code C3 should imply that the installation is not necessarily dangerous but it may not comply with the current version of the regulations or for example, may have damaged fittings that do not have exposed live parts. A code C3, in itself, should not warrant an overall unsatisfactory report.

You will need to address C1, C2 and FI faults on your report in order to achieve compliance. Once faults have been rectified and your electrician has issued you with the relevant paperwork, Electrical Installation Certificate (EIC) or Minor Works Certificate (MW) these should be kept together with the EICR to prove all faults have been rectified in accordance with BS7671.

Unusual for you buzz to put forward more that a few sentences. I nearly got a nose bleed :)
 
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.

Could you not just screw back the fused spur back, and save a few trees, or electrical emails.

Edit Oopps, hoisted by my own petard :oops:
 
Hit, nail and head spring to mind

C1 if at a low level and you can see the copper
C2 if at a high level and if you can see copper

BUT ifs it when doing an EICR, I would probably get one out of the van and fit it ............ unless the installation is a pile of poo!
I don't see why there would be a difference between high level and low level in this scenario?

It's like saying light switch missing, exposed live parts - C1. Ceiling rose missing, exposed live parts - C2.
 
Please can we remind members to reply to each other with respect and a polite manner, a post has been deleted for mocking another member, let's not slip into personal attacks, having a difference of opinion is inevitable given the industry and the ambiguity of the Regs, if you believe someone is wrong then make your case an if possible back it up while at the same time been respectful and polite.
 
I don't see why there would be a difference between high level and low level in this scenario?

It's like saying light switch missing, exposed live parts - C1. Ceiling rose missing, exposed live parts - C2.

Most ceiling roses can be easily reached from ground level.

How can an exposed conductive part at say 4 meters up be an immediate danger to life or property?
 
Please can we remind members to reply to each other with respect and a polite manner, a post has been deleted for mocking another member, let's not slip into personal attacks, having a difference of opinion is inevitable given the industry and the ambiguity of the Regs, if you believe someone is wrong then make your case an if possible back it up while at the same time been respectful and polite.

That looks like mine that was deleted. It was meant as tongue in cheek, hence the winky smiley face.

I did not have @Dillb down as a sensitive soul.

@Dillb I apologise if I hurt your feelings.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Glasgow
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Other
If other, please explain
uni student currently doing a MSc in Advanced construction tech and BIM

Thread Information

Title
Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
164

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
MG201,
Last reply from
westward10,
Replies
164
Views
15,522

Advert

Back
Top