Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios | Page 5 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

No. That path leads to non payment.

C1 requires immediate attention as it's immediate danger. If I come across any C1's, I inform the client immediately and make safe. Never had a problem with not getting paid when highlighting and acting on a dangerous situation.Better that than some kiddy comes along and sticks their mitts into it. Recently carried out an EICR on a rental property and I came across a young lad playing with the fuse board in the cupboard under the stairs.
 
C1 requires immediate attention as it's immediate danger. If I come across any C1's, I inform the client immediately and make safe. Never had a problem with not getting paid when highlighting and acting on a dangerous situation.Better that than some kiddy comes along and sticks their mitts into it. Recently carried out an EICR on a rental property and I came across a young lad playing with the fuse board in the cupboard
me says this on post #30 ,but is down to the test engineer what he puts down .once you have put any defects on the test sheet .and covered your a77. it now down to the customer .
 
[Q
me says this on post #30 ,but is down to the test engineer what he puts down .once you have put any defects on the test sheet .and covered your a77. it now down to the customer .

Most of my clients are Landlords who really don't want to end up in court and would rather I fix there and then if possible to avoid further call outs and risk to tenants. It's their call at the end of the day but for a simple fix like a missing blank it's better safe than sorry.
 
The problem arises when asked what work was done .can lead to disputes. And as a larger company sometimes it's seen as an open checkbook.

Yes, that's a good point and Buzzlightyears too. I guess that as a one man band with a good working relationship with my clients it comes down to trust. Now then, where did I park my Buggatti Chiron?:D
 
A Code 1 (C1) observation means ‘Danger present, risk of injury, Immediate remedial action required.’ It is an immediate threat and should be rectified or made safe as soon as possible. An example of a C1 defect would be accessible live conductors due to damage, poorly modified enclosures or removed maintenance panels. Incorrect polarity would also attract a code C1 as it may allow conductive parts, not normally expected to be live, to become live.

The presence of a code C1 warrants immediate action to be taken which would be to inform the duty holder or responsible person for the installation immediately, both verbally and in writing, of the risk of injury that exists.

A Code 2 (C2) is a potentially dangerous defect, these might be things that don’t pose an immediate threat but are likely to become a danger in the future. A C2 is described as ‘Potentially dangerous – urgent remedial action required.’

The phrase “potentially dangerous”, in the C2 code is designed to point towards a risk of injury from contact with live parts after a sequence of events. A sequence of events could mean that an individual may gain access to live parts through a day to day task that would not be expected to give access to live parts.

An observation code FI is described as ‘Further investigation required without delay.’ This means that your electrical contractor has observed something whilst carrying out the testing for instance emergency lights seem very dim. This might not have been covered in the report so they have noted it separately as code FI.

Codes C1 and C2 attract unsatisfactory report findings and you’ll have to have these defects rectified in order to prove compliance. A report could also be classed as unsatisfactory if the only fault codes are FI. An example would be when there are lots of circuits that are not verified at the time of testing, this is because the inspector would not be able to categorically say that these circuits are safe or not.

Code 3 is described as ‘Improvement recommended.’ This means it does not comply with the regulations but isn’t actually dangerous. A code C3 should imply that the installation is not necessarily dangerous but it may not comply with the current version of the regulations or for example, may have damaged fittings that do not have exposed live parts. A code C3, in itself, should not warrant an overall unsatisfactory report.

You will need to address C1, C2 and FI faults on your report in order to achieve compliance. Once faults have been rectified and your electrician has issued you with the relevant paperwork, Electrical Installation Certificate (EIC) or Minor Works Certificate (MW) these should be kept together with the EICR to prove all faults have been rectified in accordance with BS7671.

Unusual for you buzz to put forward more that a few sentences. I nearly got a nose bleed :)
 
For instance today I had a fused spur in the loft area supplying the tv amplifier for a small block of flats , cover not screwed back so exposed live parts.
Normally I would c1 this however the loft area is only accessible by step ladders ( non fitted internally) and the loft cover can only be opened by a hex key.
I did not c1 this in this scenario.

Could you not just screw back the fused spur back, and save a few trees, or electrical emails.

Edit Oopps, hoisted by my own petard :oops:
 
Hit, nail and head spring to mind

C1 if at a low level and you can see the copper
C2 if at a high level and if you can see copper

BUT ifs it when doing an EICR, I would probably get one out of the van and fit it ............ unless the installation is a pile of poo!
I don't see why there would be a difference between high level and low level in this scenario?

It's like saying light switch missing, exposed live parts - C1. Ceiling rose missing, exposed live parts - C2.
 
Please can we remind members to reply to each other with respect and a polite manner, a post has been deleted for mocking another member, let's not slip into personal attacks, having a difference of opinion is inevitable given the industry and the ambiguity of the Regs, if you believe someone is wrong then make your case an if possible back it up while at the same time been respectful and polite.
 

Reply to Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
438
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
There is no homework, and I'll never see these photo again.
Replies
3
Views
623
As the cable itself has had the cpc cut off at both ends I would enter a C3 as it doesn't offer any protection within the cable if accidentally...
Replies
3
Views
348

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top