Determined to fix it myself but need a little help... | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Determined to fix it myself but need a little help... in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

Yes,why is that?.....whats the thinking?

Sorry guys - missed the first post of this "Why's that then" - so for both :)

Just a pet peeve really - the propensity for danger is higher, the use of crappy choc block in a switch enclosure, the increase in fault possibilities, and the fact that switch enclosures (generally) aren't designed to terminate neutral conductors.

I just find it kinda sloppy when there are other, better ways of dealing with the neutral conductor in a lighting circuit.

As I say, really personal preference, just don't think it's good practice to have conductors other than those being switched (and CPC, obviously) in the enclosure.
 
i see your point , Bill, but how may times have we been to fit, say, a porch light, and found the only way to get a neutral is to access the hall light, entailing cutting holes in ceiling or weetabix floor, after moveng beds etc., lifting bedroom carpet, when it would be so much easier if there were a neutral in the hall light switch. just drill out and replace switch with 2 gang.
 
Last edited:
i see your point , Bill, but how may times have we been to fit, say, a porch light, and found the only way to get a neutral is to access the hall light, entailing cutting holes in ceiling or weetabix floor, after moveng beds etc., lifting bedroom carpet, when it would be so much easier if there were a neutral in the hall light switch. just drill out and replace switch with 2 gang.

Take your point totally - and yes, it is a case where a neutral in the switch enclosure would be handy.

I've nothing against the theory of neutrals in switch enclosures, I just wish that instead of some of the other pointless reg changes made, someone would stop and say "hang on - why don't we make all switches double pole, or why don't we ensure back boxes for plate switches, etc., have a proper termination for a neutral conductor.

I think the point was made all the more obvious to me given the mixed colours in that switch enclosure - old coloured 3&E and new coloured T&E at least, from memory - that put an unsheathed blue switched live in there, and blue neutrals...

Add to that someone, with respect, who doesn't know the difference, but does know we usually claim "colour to colour" as a standard replacement method, and we have trouble.

Thing is, we all know guys, including ourselves at the end of a long week, who would look at that in a situation where someone has helpfully put the switched live blue in with all the other blue neutrals and not see the fault.

In that particular case, it bothered me a bit - I'd have made sure there was a JB somewhere outside of that switch enclosure as it looks to me as though they effectively did the three plate in the switch, rather than a fitting.

I know that's getting away from the "neutrals in the switch" discussion, just observations while I was on that switch - in principle, I guess I'm just against connections that don't need to be there, especially when they're terminated in biscuit block. And, yes, I know Wagos weren't around then too :)

No easy answer - and yes, there are advantages to neutrals in switch enclosures, just wish the regs would catch up to the practice, and we either made it standard that there's a neutral present or not - and if there is, that manufacturers start providing a proper terminal either on the back box, or on the switch for them.

Maybe I'm just getting old, not getting enough, or feeling really picky this week lol!
 
Good points,we are all entitled to take whatever view we like.....Personally I feel there are huge advantages in looping feeds to switches,with a single cable out to the lights. One or at worst two cables at the light,no joint boxes...all connections accessible...simples.
 
Hi all,
Apparently there is a new switch from hager (lightswitch), that has a slot for the neutrals to fit in as well.
Not bad I say, as its should be easier for all those you feed the switch as oposed to the ceiling rose.
Check it out.
Best regards,
Sav
 
I'm more interested in finding out what the hell a 'Kigchen' is (see first picture). All this talk of neutrals and safety vs. convenience is all very well but there is simply no excuse for bad spellink on sticky labels. Reminds me of those Kewtech EIC's I've got that ask for the RCD "Residential" Current.



I'll get me coat...
 
I used to share exactly the same views as accordfire no no for neutrals at switches but with the birth of downlighters it is a lot easier to have just a pair of twins to connect at each downlight i just install deeper back boxes for the switches and fix the connector to the back box much easier than three plate
 
Sorry guys - missed the first post of this "Why's that then" - so for both :)

Just a pet peeve really - the propensity for danger is higher, the use of crappy choc block in a switch enclosure, the increase in fault possibilities, and the fact that switch enclosures (generally) aren't designed to terminate neutral conductors.

I just find it kinda sloppy when there are other, better ways of dealing with the neutral conductor in a lighting circuit.

As I say, really personal preference, just don't think it's good practice to have conductors other than those being switched (and CPC, obviously) in the enclosure.

Well, wago type connectors are fully insulated unlike chocbloc...and Hagar now do a switch with a spare terminal to terminate neutrals.
 
Well, wago type connectors are fully insulated unlike chocbloc...and Hagar now do a switch with a spare terminal to terminate neutrals.

Yup true. Sadly Wagos haven't been around too long - but they are a far better solution that choc block. Better still would be, like Hager, if all manufacturers put a neutral terminal in place.

It is a personal opinion, don't get me wrong - just one of those bug bear things we all have.
 
Good points,we are all entitled to take whatever view we like.....Personally I feel there are huge advantages in looping feeds to switches,with a single cable out to the lights. One or at worst two cables at the light,no joint boxes...all connections accessible...simples.

totally agree mate much easier than hanging off steps trying to wire jb`s
 
Sorry guys,
Not wanting to disrupt the chat but just wanted to throw in my request again - - Is there anyone living near London SW8 who would be willing to pop round and help with our problem?
jimbob
 

Reply to Determined to fix it myself but need a little help... in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
265
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
756
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
740

Similar threads

Thanks will give that a try in a little while Cheers Writing to say thank you very much for that advice, its worked! Really appreciate the help
Replies
6
Views
850
SOLVED Thanks for all the help. It was nothing to do with the smoke detector. In this new hole (where there will be a light fitting) three white...
    • Like
2
Replies
24
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top