D
dingledong
Should we ban people from infected countries even entering the country ? You could come here and have no ill effects for a week before you start showing symptoms so why are we checking people when they come here
But only one airport is screened and it seems they just ask you a couple of questions at the screening and that's it
What more could be needed? Who's going to lie about being asked some simple questions ......
Ebola? What ebola?
Ebola has killed for centuries and will continue to do so, as has malaria, flu, dysentery, polio, measles, pox etc...
We are at as much risk from a widespread ebola outbreak in the UK as we were when swine flu and bird flu were the topic of the week on the six o'clock fear outlets. Ebola is managed and screening is taking place when people are arriving from affected areas. There's nothing more to be said on the matter.
Next...
No, not centuries. It first emerged in The Sudan in 1976.
The issue isn't the number of deaths in absolute terms. In the context of the population of West Africa, it's tiny. So far.
It's the rate of increase that is of concern in the current outbreak. It has gone from several tens to several thousand in a few months at at an increasing rate.
Either nature will provide the reset button, perhaps ebola is it, or politicians will by giving us a good old fashioned war. Either way the herd will be culled sooner or later and there's not a great deal we can do about it.
Until then I'll just get on with things as quietly and efficiently as I can
Not a very well considered question, many of the people entering the UK from Ebola areas are UK citizens going back home. How are you going to stop them reentering the UK?Should we ban people from infected countries even entering the country ?.....
Not a very well considered question, many of the people entering the UK from Ebola areas are UK citizens going back home. How are you going to stop them reentering the UK?
Not a very well considered question, many of the people entering the UK from Ebola areas are UK citizens going back home. How are you going to stop them reentering the UK?
Better start building refugee camps on one of the Channel Islands then.
.... and some other nasty things in the past.
According to the last publicised figures there have been aproximately 4000 deaths since the current outbreak emerged. In the same period 30000 people have died from malaria and over 300,000 children have died from easily preventable diseases.
And here lies the problem.... Who to beleave....
In six months time the outbreak will have subsided, there'll be a decrease of a similar magnitude. It's what usually happens with ebola, when my brother worked in Gabon about 7 years ago there was an outbreak there. It arose out of nowhere, killed a few hundred people in a relatively small area then disappeared again. It wasn't reported anywhere in the western media.Heart disease and strokes between them result is about 14,000,000 deaths a year.
By way of contrast, Ebola a mere 4,000. In six months.
A trivial, almost insignificant, number by comparison it would appear.
But that's not really the whole story. As I posted earlier, it isn't just about absolute numbers. It's the rate of increase that is of concern.
In 12 years, world heart disease and stroke fatalities have risen by about 17%, roughly mirroring the population growth over that period.
By way of contrast, Ebola fatalities have risen by about 8,000% in around six months.
Some more numbers.
In six months Ebola has killed ten times as many people as bird flu did in ten years.
There is no comparison.
For the avoidance of doubt, I'm not scaremongering. Just trying to give some context.
It may well be that the current outbreak gets contained regionally but it just might not be as trivial as some here seem to be suggesting.
Had a very similar discussion just a moment ago with my wife.Tell you what I can't believe. The suggestions that our borders should be shut thus closing down access to this country from others. Suppose one of your children was displaying symptoms after being away on holiday, I bet you wouldn't be bloody bleating on about closing borders then. Idiots.
Yeah, let's all panic and run round like headless chickens, let's paralyse international trade because some of those bugs might be transmissible on produce that we buy from these countries. Let's shut down all international transport because you never know who some of those nasty. dirty foreigners might have been rubbing up against.
The same hysteria was put about by the media previously and they were left with egg on their faces when it turned to naught. The fact of the matter is that if it comes here it comes here and there's sweet bugger all anyone can do about it because unless we behave like the village of Ely during the great plague we have no means of dealing with it effectively.
Now can we please stop panicking and get on with things.
I hope you're right.In six months time the outbreak will have subsided, there'll be a decrease of a similar magnitude. It's what usually happens with ebola, when my brother worked in Gabon about 7 years ago there was an outbreak there. It arose out of nowhere, killed a few hundred people in a relatively small area then disappeared again. It wasn't reported anywhere in the western media.
It will disappear again, the world will return to a state of complacency and a force fed diet of celebrity gossip but we'll still have the other problems you mentioned mate.
The world could do with a reset button.. Then hopefully next time there will not be as many idiot..
All this ebola talk, IMO the OP has mad cow disease.
when i first of ebola i though it was manchester citys latest signing.
Perhaps that's what mooved him to make the post...........All this ebola talk, IMO the OP has mad cow disease.
Efficiently I can do mate.... Quiet I can't. I'm a noisy bugger and there are too many idiots that ask me questions then don't like it when I reply with the truth...