D
Deleted member 26818
You don’t need any qualifications to carry out EICRs.Why not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Discuss EICR rectifications completed by another electrician, what now? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
You don’t need any qualifications to carry out EICRs.Why not?
You don’t need any qualifications to carry out EICRs.
I don’t know what you mean by being signed off for x amount of years?
If it’s unsatisfactory, there’s no x number of years.
If I conduct an EICR, that’s it all done.
Someone wants another EICR, they pay for it.
I’m not about to amend my report, just because someone says they’ve rectified the faults I’ve found.
Not sure what the official line is here but as others have said the EICR is just a report detailing the condition of the installation. If a different company comes in to carry out remedial work then perhaps they could issue a cover letter with the certs, confirming that all defects noted in the report have been rectified.
So do your reports that list code C1 and code C2 observations, say Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory?I don’t know what kind of reports you issue but the ones we issue clearly state a next inspection due date that is dependant on all C1 and C2 remedials being repaired urgently.
An unsatisfactory EICR is still signed off generally for 5/10 years. Subject to remedial works being completed.
So do your reports that list code C1 and code C2 observations, say Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory?
So how does it become Satisfactory?
Does the client erase ‘Un”?
Do you issue a new report?
Is it by magic?
Why not?
Because you can carry out an EICR without doing it, and it doesn’t prove that you have the required level of experience and competence.
What I’m trying to do, is work out what it is you are saying.It is really very very simple. The installation becomes satisfactory following an unsatisfactory report issued on the day of the inspection and a paper trail evidencing that the remedials have been carried out in good time.
You are either trolling (which is not even good trolling) or you are desperatly trying to justify your business model of carrying out unnecessary EICRs.
What I’m trying to do, is work out what it is you are saying.
Because you’re about as clear as mud.
Now I have already posted that where an EICR is Unsatisfactory, appending certificates for the remedial work required, should be all that is required.
Now if you wish to disagree with that, or you consider it to be trolling, then please explain why.
However appending certification does not magically make the EICR Satisfactory. The EICR is still Unsatisfactory.
My business model is such, that if a client now requires me to alter the EICR from Unsatisfactory, to Satisfactory, I will refuse.
I would be willing to re-inspect the Installation and issue a new EICR, which may or may not be Satisfactory.
From personal experience, I have seen remedial work carried out which resulted in the upstairs and downstairs RFCs being terminated into each other’s MCBs.
Now some may consider incorrect labelling as a code C3.
However as the Consumer Unit is intended to be used by ordinary persons (i.e. non-competent, non-trained, non-skilled, etc.) I consider a code C2 to be applicable.
In any event whichever code applies, it will not have been recorded on the unsatisfactory EICR.
If you find it reprehensible that I am not prepared to state an installation will be Satisfactory for x amount of years, if the listed C1 and C2 observations are rectified by others, without first inspecting the work, you are nuts.
I also think, that you’re nuts for being willing to effectively guarantee other’s work for x amount of years, without first inspecting that work.
Of course, if you are not saying such, then explain just what it is you are saying.
Try to be clear and effective in your explanation.
What I am saying is very clear.
You issue an undatisfactory EICR and recommend a date of next inspection. That date must assume all works that are required to be done, are done. This is written in black amd white and is not open to interpretation.
When given an unsatisfatory EICR for say the incorrect OCPD installed how long would you put for the next inspection due? Goving what you have said above it would appear that you would not put any date in as you would not sign it off unless you have seen the remedial works??
Reply to EICR rectifications completed by another electrician, what now? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net