Insualtuion Resistance - individual circuits V bank of MCBs & RCD readings | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Insualtuion Resistance - individual circuits V bank of MCBs & RCD readings in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

I think this may be one of those 'you have to be there' kind of faults!

All

Thanks for the replies and interpreting my waffle. its given me some fresh thoughts and stuff to eliminate on retesting. Thankfully not live yet, and not even DNO connected for another month.

bit of a nightmare and another lesson learned for me to do my testing with a clear head and not at the end of a 14hr day, with a 50 mile drive to go on top!

cheers

Engineer54> I did remove these conductors and taped the ends before the IR (500v) test, on all PIR fittings. Certain nothing other than the Ext fan was connected and this was switched off at the 3pole isolator
 
I've got a bit lost on this one BUT if there is a very low IR as you suggest the only thing to do is closely inspect the specific circuit in question.

It sounds like a new build so as you installed it then fault finding should be a breeze!
 
If you're sure there's no obvious short (from inspection) ... sounds like may be a tranny/dimmer/relay or lamp still in circuit somewhere, something's obv current hungry somewhere.

Time to start successive dividing of the circuit to close in on the fault; if reinspecting reveals nothing. Start by disc at CU end, then move to approx middle of circuit and try both legs there and repeat.
 
Tested each of 9 new circuits in usual way of L.O.C. and IR, all in theory ok ... CCU is a Hagar split-load dual RCD. 1-4 on RCD1 / 5 - 9 on RCD2

Aware that no requirement for "collective" IR on EIC, just individual circuits.

No idea what you mean by "L.O.C.", but insulation resistance should be tested with all circuits in parallel (and with the means of Earthing connected) rather than each circuit. If you test circuits individually then you would need to calculate the parallel resistance to see if it complied with the minimum acceptable for BS 7671.
 
No idea what you mean by "L.O.C.", but insulation resistance should be tested with all circuits in parallel (and with the means of Earthing connected) rather than each circuit. If you test circuits individually then you would need to calculate the parallel resistance to see if it complied with the minimum acceptable for BS 7671.

Unless i'm misreading this, Pass that by me Again please!!! lol!!
 
No probs. I was just saying that the minimum insulation resistance quoted in BS 7671 is for the installation/dis board, and as such if individual readings were taken for different circuits then the effect of the parallel resistances on the overall insulation resistance would need to be considered.
 
No probs. I was just saying that the minimum insulation resistance quoted in BS 7671 is for the installation/dis board, and as such if individual readings were taken for different circuits then the effect of the parallel resistances on the overall insulation resistance would need to be considered.
That is incorrect. The insulation resistance values quoted are for individual circuits and that is why you record it as such. If you carry out a global IR then all the circuit resistances are in parallel so will be lower than any individual circuit. If global IR gives you an acceptable level then you need do no more and record all as that value.
 
No probs. I was just saying that the minimum insulation resistance quoted in BS 7671 is for the installation/dis board, and as such if individual readings were taken for different circuits then the effect of the parallel resistances on the overall insulation resistance would need to be considered.

Think you've hot the wrong end of the stick there!

Insulation resistance is tested for each circuit, if you tried doing one global test on a large installation it will come out with a seriously low value.
 
That is incorrect. The insulation resistance values quoted are for individual circuits and that is why you record it as such. If you carry out a global IR then all the circuit resistances are in parallel so will be lower than any individual circuit. If global IR gives you an acceptable level then you need do no more and record all as that value.

Global IR's are fine for initial checking, but are totally meaningless as far as official recording of circuit IR values in say EICR etc.... If anyone accepts a global IR value of an installation on any official recording medium, something somewhere is very Wrong!!
 
Global IR's are fine for initial checking, but are totally meaningless as far as official recording of circuit IR values in say EICR etc....

Agreed, but it seems to be the cheap and cheerful way of doing it for your ÂŁ50 drive-by landlords special. Worst still is they only do a L/N to E test so they don't need to disconnect anything!. Guess if you put down what you're doing in the limitations box ..........
 
Yes that's that new approved test......Licking Of Conductors

Brilliant :clap::clap:

Low Ohm Continuity

All circuits, bar circuit 9, individually, came out as >999 M ohm across L-N, L-CPC, and N-CPC. it was only when I connected them all up to the RCDs, and doing a collective test, that the L-N came out as 0.06 M ohm on RCD 2 / Circuits 5-9.

With circuit 9 disconnected, circuits 5-8 all read >999 m ohm, and Circuit 9 caused the drop. testing circuit 9 individually across its respective conductors gave the following:

L-N = 600 M ohm
L - CPC = >999 M ohm
N - CPC = >999 M ohm

I got in a spin when connecting it up and got that 0.06 reading across L-N as a "collective".

Additionally I can't connect the CCU to the main earth as the supply cable hasn't been installed by the DNO yet.

I did leave an extractor fan connected on circuit 9, although off at the 3-pole isolator. As its a load, I should have really pulled the wires out. It had been a long day and I was panicking a bit when I started this topic ...

Cheers for all the replys, you have all given me fresh hope!
 

Reply to Insualtuion Resistance - individual circuits V bank of MCBs & RCD readings in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
410
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Continuity of the suspect cable appears fine all cores, from this I could work out the length of it and it really doesn’t appear looking at the...
Replies
2
Views
357
  • Question
There can be a few reasons for low L+N -> E readings: Connected equipment is leaking. By design, or just old/damp SPD are connected (but there...
Replies
9
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top