Is this installation considered acceptable today? (1-ring including oven and everything else) | Page 6 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Is this installation considered acceptable today? (1-ring including oven and everything else) in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Messages
69
Reaction score
22
Location
Edinburgh, UK
Looking for some advice on what I've discovered is the electrics situation in my rental property.

I'll note that before I moved in here I made the Letting agents (LA) more than aware I use an absolute -----ton of power. I told them I can and will be pulling 2,000-4,000 kWh a quarter (with gas hob and heating). No concerns raised.

When I moved in here it looked promising. CU had no spare slots, plenty of MCBs and RCD protection in place. Nice one I thought, 4x 32A MCBs, good chance we've got a couple of rings and kitchen will be on its own. As it turns out, nope.

I haven't removed the cover, so I have not been able to confirm what connections we have inside the CU but I can confirm my findings in terms of what the resulting circuits are.

1) 16A - Does nothing
2) 16A - Radial to water heater switch, on to a switch in the living room that's got a single GU10 lamp installed in a unit coming from it. (Water heater removed some time ago)
3) 6A - Smoke alarms [Issue: One not receiving mains power but clearly wired into the trunking containing this circuit so should be]
4) 6A - Lights (Kitchen, Bathroom, Master Bedroom)
5) 6A - Lights (Lounge, Hallway, Second bedroom)

So far so good, this looks great, other than the oddity of feeding the GU10 lamp from the previously installed radial, but makes sense as this terminates inside the bottom of the unit containing the GU10 so just laziness prevails.

6) 32A - Does nothing
7) 32A - Does nothing
8) 32A - ALL sockets (Lounge, hallway, kitchen, oven, boiler, master bedroom, second bedroom)
9) 32A - Shower
10) 40A - Does nothing

Not so good. We have a single 32A ring covering everything including the bloody oven, washing machine, tumble dryer and the rest of the gaff on top!

Why the hell install all of those 32A MCBs to do sweet F all?

I've confirmed this is definitely the case by killing off the circuits in almost every possible order and I can see that nothing else is getting a complete circuit to these circuits enabling power to flow.


Now for the big question.

I did some maths here and it looks like this is seriously overloaded pretty much any time we're using the kitchen pretty heavily (most nights...).

A typical evening in the house consists of washing and drying lasting 3-4 hours, concurrently (4.6kW total), whilst over the course of this the oven will be put on (7.8kW total) and often a hair dryer (8.8kW total) and kettle (11.8kW total) too. Admittedly the last two are far shorter use, but this is seriously over the rating for this circuit and I don't feel it's over the top usage of a house.

Let's add up purely the kitchen during a typical wash and prepare meal:
2,550W - 3,000W - Kettle
900W - Toaster
80W - Fridge
125W - Boiler
2,200W - Washing Machine
2,400W - Tumble dryer
3,200W - Oven

Not all of this will be on all the time but lets assume this is peak before taking into account any of the rest of the property.

11,455W or 11.45kW best case, 11.8kW worst case. Now my 32A circuit should not be over 7.2kWh and probably not over 5.76kW for extended periods.

Then we get to two HDR tellys on pretty much all the time, set top boxes, server, multiple PCs with multiple monitors connected, PoE Switches and networking gear, smart home gear and when I am using it I often have a lab set up with multiple PCs which is where we get to the 4kW/quarter.

Right now, I'm concerned that before we even cover the devices used throughout the house, the kitchen alone (well counting the hall cupboard with tumble dryer) is pulling 159% - 164% of the rated load on this circuit.


I know that the best practise for a single ring can be based upon property size, not certain of the specs here though.

I'm unsure of the sq footage of the entire property but I'd say it isn't particularly small. We're looking at 165 sq feet in the master bedroom alone.

Should I be raising this with the LA and pushing to get this sorted out so that at very least the oven is moved to its own radial circuit and preferably get the rest of the kitchen moved over to its own ring too?

Would you suggest it's worth myself looking at spurring off this 16A radial to get an extra couple of sockets, capable of at least 13A, running in the living room that won't be on this single ring?

The 32A to the shower is currently running into the hall cupboard where there is an isolator switch. The sockets in there are on the main ring and contain my comms cabinet and the tumble dryer. The comms cabinet won't use a huge amount, although does have quite a few devices and PoE switch providing power to WiFi, VoIP phones and some smart home devices. Is there anything I could do to take power off this? Either going with a fused spur or a Garage CU that then splits into the shower and extra sockets? (I know this will require notification and a competent installer doing it).


Any thoughts from the pros would be greatly appreciated here as I'm not sure if it would be considered enough of a problem to have a LA take action, however, way I see it I'm constantly stressing this system beyond what it was intended for with no idea how the wiring quality in the walls is, so it's a concern, whether or not the LA will do anything or not I'm not sure and I don't want to raise it without getting some professional opinions.
 
In your first post you stated you are studying for the 18th edition - so you should understand that circuit designs are simply that - a design based on a considered load of circuit(s) - specific items over 2Kw and not supplied with a 13A plug fitted should be on their own circuits, as should immersions ...

An EICR done on an empty flat can take no account of possible future uses - over potential overloads ................... so an EICR conducted now with you and all your IT may well decide that there is a distinct possibility of overload ................. no 2 occupants are the same, nor are there requirements

Hope this helps.

Thanks Murdoch.

This is helpful and yeah I get the general idea behind the circuits being put in to design, and when renting or buying an existing property I've not been any part of that design process, I just have very little experience working in the field so wanted to check if this was more common than I thought it would be - and yeah it seems it is.

My LA have been in touch and have a spark coming out tomorrow to look at it as their records state the EICR should be the latest and correct.

I'll be there to see what's gone on and can report back if anybody is interested.
 
i smell a ÂŁ50 EICR. think murdoch mentioned that also. lost track of the number of EICRs I've lost due to cheapskate LAs wanting "on the cheap".

I'm finding it hard to believe, but not impossible, that anybody remotely competent could have completed this EICR with things in their current state.

If somebody has put two rings on an EICR with different R1+R2 and Zs values and listed two separate MCBs whilst the two circuits are actually terminated into the same MCB, they should not be in the trade...

Tomorrow will tell, perhaps, although it's not like they'd fess up if the original EICR was the botch job.
 
I’ve got CCTV pointed right at the CU and it has the option to add a battery backup. Right now that’s on the camera pointing outside but I’ll move it over and should get some good pics.

If it was my place then no question I’d be happy just taking the cover off. Worst case i discover something terribly wrong and keep it powered off until I can see a professional. But given it’s a rental I’ll just keep a keen eye on the sparks there.
 
I meant just a sly peek over the shoulder as you pass him a cup of tea, not CCTV surveillance.
You'll have to tell him he's being recorded.

If you would be so kind as to tell us the answers to these questions after he's been:-
1. Does electrician take the cover off the board?
2. Does he use a test kit or multi-function tester at all?
3. Does he leave within an hour?
We'll be able to say how competent (or lazy) the electrician is

Problem is, the LL doesn't have to act on the EICR unless there's some serious (dangerous) problems, and if he does, it could take months for any changes
 
If there are two rings discovered inside the CU terminated into one MCB it may well be that DIY tampering has been at work since the EICR. BUT if only one is discovered the person who wrote up the EICR should be fired, I do wonder if there are a number of flats at the OPs location of the same size and layout and creative guesswork has been utilised rather than proper inspection and testing ?
If I tested a property with just a single ring final circuit and an electric oven was also on that circuit I'd definitely flag it up as a C3 - Improvement recommended.
 
I meant just a sly peek over the shoulder as you pass him a cup of tea, not CCTV surveillance.
You'll have to tell him he's being recorded.

If you would be so kind as to tell us the answers to these questions after he's been:-
1. Does electrician take the cover off the board?
2. Does he use a test kit or multi-function tester at all?
3. Does he leave within an hour?
We'll be able to say how competent (or lazy) the electrician is

Problem is, the LL doesn't have to act on the EICR unless there's some serious (dangerous) problems, and if he does, it could take months for any changes

I would add that I didn't put this in place for this occasion!

The CU is in the hallway to the left of the entrance door hence its covered so well by existing CCTV covering the entrance.

I will advise the guy that he may be recorded and kept for 48 hours. My only thought was this could be handy to show you guys what is found inside the CU, but absolutely no intent to show the poor spark who's probably never had anything to do with this property.

(Don't think that would be OK to do anyway and I am registered with the ICO as a data controller for the CCTV system so I take my responsibilities there seriously.)

If the guy doesn't take the cover off the board I can say I'll be moving out...

If there are two rings discovered inside the CU terminated into one MCB it may well be that DIY tampering has been at work since the EICR. BUT if only one is discovered the person who wrote up the EICR should be fired, I do wonder if there are a number of flats at the OPs location of the same size and layout and creative guesswork has been utilised rather than proper inspection and testing ?
If I tested a property with just a single ring final circuit and an electric oven was also on that circuit I'd definitely flag it up as a C3 - Improvement recommended.

It does have the name of the person signing off on the EICR on the report so I could follow up further if needed once this has taken place.

I've scanned a copy of this before anyone requests seeing it tomorrow so that I definitely have a copy.

The only C3s listed are:

1. Smoke alarms wired in 3core flex earth wire used as live [Christ?! Thankfully its not T&E!]
2. Circuit chart not marked
3. Only partial RCD protection [Doesn't cover the half with lighting circuits and 16A radial]
4. 4.9 Correct identification of circuit details and protective devices (514.8.1; 514.9.1) is recommended for improvement
5. 4.10 Presence of RCD quarterly test notice at or near consumer unit/distribution board (514.12.2) is recommended for improvement
6. 4.11 Presence of non-standard (mixed) cable colour warning notice at or near consumer unit/distribution board (514.14) is recommended for improvement.
7. 4.18 RCD(s) provided for fault protection - includes RCBOs (411.4.9; 411.5.2; 531.2) is recommended for improvement.
8. 4.19 RCD(s) provided for additional protection - includes RCBOs (411.3.3; 415.1) is recommended for improvement
9. 5.12.3 For cables connected in walls at a depth of less than 50mm (522.6.202; 522.6.203) is recommended for improvement.
10. 5.12.4 For cables concealed in walls/partitions containing metal parts regardless of depth (522.6.203) is recommended for improvement.
11. 8.1 Additional protection for all low voltage (LV) circuits by RCD not exceeding 30mA (701.411.3.3) is recommended for improvement.
 
Last edited:
ref #83,
point 1,- is just unbelievable. Have you checked your detectors work? and if more than one, are they interconnected? All sound when one tested? What is the "replace by" date on them?

point 2,- Could have been done when the EICR was carried out.

point 3,- pointless. Not all circuits have to be RCD protected.

point 4,- See point 2

point 5,- Pure laziness. You get a sticker with every RCD in the box.

point 6,- Only needed if there are mixed colours in the installation.
(ok, I guess there is if the detectors are wired in flex!)

points 7 to 11 are just spouting off regulations as far as I can see to cover earlier points
 
If there are two rings discovered inside the CU terminated into one MCB it may well be that DIY tampering has been at work since the EICR. BUT if only one is discovered the person who wrote up the EICR should be fired, I do wonder if there are a number of flats at the OPs location of the same size and layout and creative guesswork has been utilised rather than proper inspection and testing ?
If I tested a property with just a single ring final circuit and an electric oven was also on that circuit I'd definitely flag it up as a C3 - Improvement recommended.
Dave OCD, I half agree in so far as I would flag it as an observation only with no code.

In EICR's I use the codes C1, C2, C3, FI as per guidance, but I also put in observations as no code.

Aluminium cables that have good test reads I put under observation only no code.
Re wire able fuse boards observation only no code.

There are some things I find that I personally don't like ,but I have no right to go against regs and code them, so I make a comment with an explanation with no code observation only.
I make it clear to customer than no action is required on these points and I am only highlighting issues I would personally advise to upgrade.
 
You’ll know if they’re not a good electrician, they’ll walk out when you tell them they’re being recorded!

Do you need to tell them? Your not a business.
Hi - hopefully I am a thorough and competent person with the experience, training and skills to carry out a domestic report as required here. I would not proceed with work being recorded for forensic examination and judgement by persons unknown to me. Why would I?
 
So the electricians, two of, have been out this morning and arrived bang on 9am as arranged.

Arrived with a toolkit and a Fluke 1653.

Didn’t want any tea or coffee.

First thing I said on their coming into the door are there are two CCTV cameras pointing right at you here and here.

First thing they did was open up the CU with a screw driver and have a look at the cabling. No isolation and no dead test (obviously, it wasn’t dead).

They identified only one ring, 6mm2 on the next B32 to the shower and 10mm2 on the non-functional B40.

I said this went against the September 2017 EICR which I presented and they looked it over.

The guy who had opened the CU then commented this has not been done on this board.

There was talk about this being raised with the guy that did the testing.

They ran round with the Fluke doing some tests in a few sockets on the ring and then discussed my concerns that had brought this to light.

They advised me that my LA typically are happy with trainee sparks opening up the CU and running new lines in their experience, however, I asked for a quote for them to assist me running a radial to the PC setup and they quoted ÂŁ120 for labour and testing. I have all materials there.

I want to double check the trunking factors but I think what I have should be fine.

So Murdoch it looks like you were on the money. EICR completely fabricated and probably the only legitimate concerns are that the installation wasn’t tested.

P.S. smoke alarms aren’t wired as Earth for live, at least not now, the earth is just snipped in the 3core and they’re not earthed. Live is brown and neutral blue though.

Edit: total visit time was around 40 minutes.
 
Last edited:

Reply to Is this installation considered acceptable today? (1-ring including oven and everything else) in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
296
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
804
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
841

Similar threads

  • Question
Hello oscar21, When I wrote about cables heating up I meant that IF a cable heated up that heat could not dissipate correctly if the cable was...
2
Replies
16
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top