S
sivoodoo
Which method would you think uses the least amont of cable, looping in at the ceiling rose or at the switch?
Regards
Si.
Regards
Si.
Well thats what SHOULD be done isn`t it....safe isolation?.....in an ideal world that is but many DIYers are simply ignorant of this............why not just turn the mcb of at the CU/DB, that way even if it is wired into the rose u wont get a zap
3 plating the downlighters everyone wants is a PITA. There was a heated thread on here a while back about neutrals at switches that the IET has now given the definitive answer to. As have hager with their new loop on switch terminals. What possible difference is there between neutrals in a terminal in a ceiling rose and neutrals in a terminal behind a switch. I mean what difference is there REALLY, other than blind ignorance, preference and age old habit? I thought we were able to be free thinking educated designers able to apply logic and reason. Why apply this only to fault finding and not design.
Maybe because one actually requires a neutral connection, while the other one doesn't!! Except maybe in the case of supplying an outside light, or a connection to supply a fire alarm/security panel.
Nothing to do with blind ignorance, an or old habits, but everything to do with logic and reason, with a good smattering of commonsense too...
Maybe because one actually requires a neutral connection, while the other one doesn't!! Except maybe in the case of supplying an outside light, or a connection to supply a fire alarm/security panel.
Nothing to do with blind ignorance, an or old habits, but everything to do with logic and reason, with a good smattering of commonsense too...
Reply to the thread, titled "Loop in at ceiling rose or switch?" which is posted in Australia on Electricians Forums.