Max Zs readings where circuits are protected by 30ma RCD's | Page 6 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Max Zs readings where circuits are protected by 30ma RCD's in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Sorry Malcolm, but i've read that report every which way and backwards, it's full of holes and it's test data is based on far too few examples to come out with the statements it makes to have any meaningful or justifiable conclusions. On my last project alone, we had more RCD device failures than the whole of the examples mentioned in this report...

To get an idea of the true failure rate, you only have to look in this, and other on-line Forums. they are an everyday occurrence!! The truth is, that today's RCD devices are not as fail safe as the manufacturers would have you believe. That's not to say that they are not improving all the time, it's just that there not quite there just yet!!! lol!!

You don't need forums or word of mouth or statistics.
You can go by your own experiances with the blooming things, and I have seen plenty not working or lazy RCD's in my working life.
 
Of course there are failures, no product is perfect, but you can't use forum posts as an example, who joins a forum and posts about the longevity and reliability of their RCD/RCBO?

There are vastly more RCD/RCBO devices being installed now than at any other time due to the requirements of BS7671:2008 yet failure reports (even on forums) don't appear to have risen in proportion!

When was the last failed RCD/RCBO post here?

And more importantly, where is there a documented case of accident or injury attributed to a failed RCD/RCBO?

We've had this conversation before, me thinks!! lol!! Now are you saying that there aren't many RCD failures reported on this and other electrical forums?? I must reading phantom posts on these forums...lol!!

Yes your right, there is an ever increasing number of RCD devices being installed these days, along with an ever increasing failure rate to match those numbers. Don't get me wrong here, i most certainly fully support the use of these RCD devices, but that doesn't mean i would totally rely on them. Seen far too many RCDs having to be returned to the manufacturer for replacement, to have the blind faith that you seem to have in them.... I have seen a marked increase in RCD device failures over the last 10 to 15 years, mainly because of the increase in the numbers being used on my projects. These are not the budget type units either, these are all from the best names in the industry....

The old chestnut of you not knowing of any accident or injury caused by any such failures of RCD devices is neither here nor there. You could easily of said the same for lack of bathroom supplementary bonding, before the advent of any requirement of RCD devices.
 
At the end of the day,electricity is a potential danger and whatever preventative action is taken,the risk remains
We can minimise the risk by following all the good working practices and using correct protective devices,but the risk never goes away

Any electro/mechanical device can fail,if the failure rate was so bad,electrical work would be taken as seriously has gas installation

It isn't,therefore the whole TT/ rcd discussion is unlikely ever to become an issue
 
ok i,ve read this thread and i,m confused. are you saying tt systems on an rcd are unsafe?. Because theirs no way to get a complient zs on one of these and if an rcd solves this problem then why should it be any different on a tn system.
 
I am saying, that a car with an anti lock braking system is a nice safety extra. But you still have and need good brakes.
Where TT is concerned If an RCD is an ABS system, I don't think much of your brakes.
 
I am saying, that a car with an anti lock braking system is a nice safety extra. But you still have and need good brakes.
Where TT is concerned If an RCD is an ABS system, I don't think much of your brakes.

I might campaign for a recall on this car but I can't find any accident statistics, Watchdog are not taking this one! ;)
 
why would u leave an installation with 68.4 ohms as a Zs, 1667 ohms or not that is clearly something u would investigate. makes u wonder wat goes thru some folks head !!!!
 

Reply to Max Zs readings where circuits are protected by 30ma RCD's in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
299
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
807
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
852

Similar threads

Duh!!! Just re-read Op's original post, it was converted to a RFC!
Replies
12
Views
685
In my opinion replacing the consumer unit and waiting to see which RCBO trips is not a good fault finding technique. If the lighting circuit...
Replies
8
Views
682
davesparks
D

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top