Very disappointed that the NIC do not appear to be a proper trade body.
They tell the public they cannot get involved in any dispute. They state that everyone who is registered is competent and uses their trademark. However they then display a list of those who are displaying their trademark illegally but appear to be unable to understand that it is an offence to use someone else's trademark without permission and deal with these people legally.
What is the point of paying out a substantial sum to an organisation that cannot even police the misuse of its own branding ???
The other issue is that you cannot be registered until you produce work for them to inspect but you cannot do the work without being registered...... WTF is all that about ???
They tell the public they cannot get involved in any dispute. They state that everyone who is registered is competent and uses their trademark. However they then display a list of those who are displaying their trademark illegally but appear to be unable to understand that it is an offence to use someone else's trademark without permission and deal with these people legally.
What is the point of paying out a substantial sum to an organisation that cannot even police the misuse of its own branding ???
The other issue is that you cannot be registered until you produce work for them to inspect but you cannot do the work without being registered...... WTF is all that about ???