R1 + R2 expected readings | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss R1 + R2 expected readings in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Nov 4, 2022
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
Location
Uk
Has anyone got a table of expected R1 + R2 readings that give a guide to what readings we should be getting when testing
 
It's possible but rather hard work from the blue book (see page 409)

Volt drop per meter is given in miliVolt / Amp / metre
Volts = Current X Resistance.
Resistance = Volts / Current.

So that volt drop number is also resistance / meter. But it's for Line and Neutral and you want Line and Earth. It's also not temperature corrects.

So for 2.5mm twin and earth....

Take the 2.5 number (18), divide by 2 as you only want one core's worth of resistance.
Then take the 1.5 number (29) and also divide by 2.

Add that all together. Then divide by 1.2 (temperature correction). That then gives you the number in the OSG

The MUCH easier way is to invest in buying the ProCerts app. Seriously recommended to the degree that I barely use the OSG.


It's early and I'm not caffeinated but that is not making too much sense. The common factor to both tests is the resistance of the cable, with or without faults. Maybe I'm missing you're point.
i use easy certs and the old version I had at my old company has to highlight high readings in red but this current version doesn’t do it
And in regards to testing I am only doing dead tests basically so would have liked a table to just check results
 
[ElectriciansForums.net] R1 + R2 expected readings

Could I use this table
 
No don't use that table, it;s ok for reference but you need to use the resistance tables, google them. The whole point being is to work out for yourself the expected measurements as a reference point. When I put in a RFC I know how much cable I have used so say it was 63 m I calculate off of that. Those charts are sort of end user you need to get into the mechanics of how they made those charts.
 
I've already explained (or tried to) how to work this out for yourself. If you don't understand, then feel free ask more questions.

Again, I'd highly recommend getting an app.
The one (and several other people on here) use has simple tables that are accurate, and also the max Zs values, among many other helpful things.
One off payment of ÂŁ18.


 
say we have R1+R2 = 2.35 ( hypothetical figure )

R2 = 1.67 x R1 ( 2.5/1.5mm )

so R1 + ( 1.67xR1 ) = 2.35

( 2.67xR1 ) = 2.35

R1 = 2.35/2.67 = 0.88

R2 = 2.35 - 0.88 = 1.47

( or R2 = 1.67 x 0.88 =1.47)
Buzz - congratulations my friend! That's the clearest and most coherent post you have ever made on this forum ;-)
 
No don't use that table, it;s ok for reference but you need to use the resistance tables, google them. The whole point being is to work out for yourself the expected measurements as a reference point. When I put in a RFC I know how much cable I have used so say it was 63 m I calculate off of that. Those charts are sort of end user you need to get into the mechanics of how they made those charts.
I am doing eicr tests so it will be just a rough guess to how much cable has been used for calculations
 
How much would yous let the reading be over before you were to investigate it further as obviously a number of things could effect readings but for like a radial socket in a house on 16amp carrying 6 sockets say the reading was just over 1ohm (just a random figure) would yous want to investigate that further for been high reading
 
How much would yous let the reading be over before you were to investigate it further as obviously a number of things could effect readings but for like a radial socket in a house on 16amp carrying 6 sockets say the reading was just over 1ohm (just a random figure) would yous want to investigate that further for been high reading
If you had a Ze of 0.75 ohms and an R1+R2 of 1 ohms for a circuit protected by a B16 breaker, would the supply disconnect in under 0.4 seconds under fault conditions?

And thats all the op needs, is a reference point. If you pay for the procerts app, they use the same resistance values in their tables to use as a quick calculation onsite.
In this case I respectfully disagree, as the OP is not just 1st fixing and dead testing, he is carrying out EICR inspections. A good understanding of electrical theory is very important to determine what is safe and what isn't.
 
What are you measuring and getting the figure 1 ohm From the circuit you descibe I would expect something around .3-.6 ohm max. I would expect age and installation technique would vary that figure if it was 1 ohm fine (ish) but would get my spider sense running looking for poor termination at sockets for instance. The critical figure at each socket would be the Zs and its compliance for ADS and if the 1ohm figure was still there for say R1 it is unlikely I would work through all the sockets to re-terminate not enough money or time for that.
 
In this case I respectfully disagree, as the OP is not just 1st fixing and dead testing, he is carrying out EICR inspections. A good understanding of electrical theory is very important to determine what is safe and what isn't.
Okay, if i had a radial circuit wired in 6mm/6mm swa and the measured R1/R2 was 0.16ohms. What table or resistance value would you personally use to calculate the length of that circuit as a reference point, and what length would you calculate?

Since you disagree with using the onsite tables and the procert one, im curious what you would use?

Im assuming the op is an approved electrician if he's doing eicrs, so should have a sound knowledge of electrical theory
 

Reply to R1 + R2 expected readings in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
356
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
909
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
Also,if you had a duel box with a lighting cct on one side you would get a false reading.
Replies
2
Views
497
Megger 15 series in my opinion are the best. Had a few 17 series that have put out err 23 codes. This is s an internal clock component issue...
Replies
2
Views
330
Darren dazz
D

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top