Shed submain SWA RCD protection | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Shed submain SWA RCD protection in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
44
Reaction score
7
Location
Manchester
Hi all,

Went to a house on friday due to sub-main to shed not energising. This was simply due to the MCB playing up. I flicked it on and off a few times and it works fine now.

However im not happy with the way the submain has been installed poorly.

The sub-main is in the form of a 3 core SWA. It isnt buried properly as i can see it in some places and the armour isnt earthed. Only the end at the shed D.B is made off using a gland and the supply end in the house is just coming through the wall in to a 4x4 box and in to the C.U on top.
The SWA is rcd protected in the house but the small 2 way D.B in the shed is not.
The shed has a few sockets and lights and i believe the customer intends to plug in a jacuzzi which will be inside the shed.

1. Does the SWA that runs outside have to be RCD protected?

2. Is it ok to have the RCD in the house, protecting both the sub-main and the circuits in the shed?

I advised the customer that the submain was potentially dangerous due to installation methods.
I also advised to fit IP sockets in the shed due to being in close proximity to the jacuzzi
 
That all sounds so wrong. The SWA made off at the garage end, wrong, should be the other end, assuming a TT arrangement at the garage. S type RCD for supply and RCD in the garage with TT arrangement. As for sockets anywhere close to a Jacuzzi, I don't think so. Seems like a recipe for a bad accident waiting to happen. You did not say what the supply is i.e. TNS or???
 
How do you know that the mcb is fine now? How do you know that it is not damaged internally?

SWA need only be earthed at on end if not used as the cpc.

What's wrong with being able to see the SWA?

How can you say the DB in the shed is not RCD protected if the submain is RCD protected?

Without the necessary information I cannot say whether the SWA needs RCD protection or not, it may require it for fault protection is the efli is too high.

I don't think you are justified in telling the customer that this circuit is dangerous and though it appears to be through lack of knowledge it could be viewed as the bullying tactic of a cowboy.
 
By flicking the mcb on and off you may of blown the fault clear and potentially left it in a dangerous situation. The only time the Distribution circuit may need to be on an RCD is if the earthing arrangement is TT or if TN and can't meet disconnection times due to poor design. If the distribution circuit is on an RCD then there would be little point in putting the final circuits at the far end on another RCD as you are not going to achieve discrimination/selectivity. With regards to the earthing of the armour of the SWA it's ideal to do it at the front end but if it's earthed at the far end then it's not really an issue. With regards to the buried depth of the cable is it likely to be damaged?
 
The supply to the house is TNCS. The SWA is fed from the C.U in the house, to the shed(no gland at this end).
It goes in to the shed after being lightly covered by soil on it journey across, and goes in to a proper gland but no banjo! So the armour braiding is not earthed.
 
The supply to the house is TNCS. The SWA is fed from the C.U in the house, to the shed(no gland at this end).
It goes in to the shed after being lightly covered by soil on it journey across, and goes in to a proper gland but no banjo! So the armour braiding is not earthed.

A banjo is not the only possible means of connecting to an SWA gland.

If it has braiding then it is not regular SWA.
 
How do you know that the mcb is fine now? How do you know that it is not damaged internally?

SWA need only be earthed at on end if not used as the cpc.

What's wrong with being able to see the SWA?

How can you say the DB in the shed is not RCD protected if the submain is RCD protected?

Without the necessary information I cannot say whether the SWA needs RCD protection or not, it may require it for fault protection is the efli is too high.

I don't think you are justified in telling the customer that this circuit is dangerous and though it appears to be through lack of knowledge it could be viewed as the bullying tactic of a cowboy.

I havent "blown the fault clear". I know this as i removed the MCB before flicking it a few times.
 
A banjo is not the only possible means of connecting to an SWA gland.

If it has braiding then it is not regular SWA.
How else would you propose to earth the armouring if at both ends the D.B/4x4 box are plastic???

I also performed insulation resistance tests on both circuits withing the shed and the SWA sub-main which came up clear. Sufficient Zs reading from all circuits also.
 
I note you have given advise on the sockets 'in close proximity' to the Jacuzzi.
Are you aware of the actual requirements for the siting of sockets in such a situation? Does the siting of the sockets meet the requirements?
 
How else would you propose to earth the armouring if at both ends the D.B/4x4 box are plastic???

I also performed insulation resistance tests on both circuits withing the shed and the SWA sub-main which came up clear. Sufficient Zs reading from all circuits also.
piranha nut.
 
How else would you propose to earth the armouring if at both ends the D.B/4x4 box are plastic???

I also performed insulation resistance tests on both circuits withing the shed and the SWA sub-main which came up clear. Sufficient Zs reading from all circuits also.
Wiska supply a twin earthing plate for their boxes....much easier than effing about with a banjo.
 

Reply to Shed submain SWA RCD protection in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
271
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
767
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
774

Similar threads

Haha yes, it is. Must be a northern expression. Have a Google 😂
Replies
3
Views
315
You would treat it as a TT installation.
2
Replies
29
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top