Folks. Can we turn the wick down on this please??.
IIRC I typed my response to the OP on my iPhone. If you've tried it, one cannot be as expansive as we would like when composing something. My thumbs don't appreciate typing 2000 words to express everything that one should consider when undergoing an electrical task.
I've been sparking a loooong time so I am well aware of the various options that there may be when looking at any sort of wiring. I attempted to simplify my (I thought) helpful response by describing what he would most likely find when he looked at the back of the socket (more than likely a ring final). Knowing there was also the potential of the socket(s) being a spur with a spur from it, or a radial I qualified my reply by saying that "If there are two cables, then it is
likely that the original socket is on a ring final circuit. But you would need to
test if this is the case."
I had hoped that this would be sufficient to head off the expert pedants, who inhabit forums like this, who seem to spend more time picking holes in any response, rather than being helpful.
@Pete999 . My sniping post was not aimed at you. But I do know exactly who lit the flame! I await my opportunity to respond in kind.
Often I will put a little something in a post to tweak a bit of a response from the OP.
Something like the OP says "can you tell me how to test if the socket is on a ring final".
To which we respond "What sort of test equipment do you have"
OP says "I've got a neon screwdriver"
We reply "Get yourself a multimeter".
etc......
I guess, at the end of this 4 page tirade, the end result is that the OP is having an electrician to advise him.
Time to move on?
Love and kisses to most of you
TTC